A systematic review of the cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2019-10-04 DOI:10.1177/1758998319876953
Rochelle Furtado, G. Nazari, J. Macdermid
{"title":"A systematic review of the cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index","authors":"Rochelle Furtado, G. Nazari, J. Macdermid","doi":"10.1177/1758998319876953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The shoulder is the leading site of musculoskeletal pain. Patient-reported outcomes, such as the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), allow us to assess shoulder pain in a clinical setting. Since the SPADI was developed in English, many cultures have cross-culturally adapted the SPADI for clinical use. The purpose of this review was to assess the translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedures and measurement properties of the adapted SPADI. Methods A systematic review was performed on cultural adaptations of the SPADI accessible through MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and/or Google Scholar. Included were prospective cohort studies that used an adapted version of the SPADI. All studies were evaluated according to the guidelines for cross-cultural adaptations and the guidelines for measurement properties. Results The search retrieved 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria. According to the recommended guidelines for cross-cultural adaptations, 16 studies performed 100% of the steps and 1 study performed 80% of the steps. When evaluating the studies’ psychometric properties based on the quality criteria, none of the studies reported all recommended measurement properties. The measurement property of reliability was reported fully by 74% of studies. Internal consistency was fully reported by 74% of studies. None of the studies were able to fully report responsiveness, agreement and/or construct validity. Conclusions Whilst the majority of studies followed proper translation procedures, testing of the measurement properties were inadequate. Therefore, it is recommended that the current adapted versions of the SPADI undergo further evaluation before use in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":"1 1","pages":"107 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1758998319876953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Introduction The shoulder is the leading site of musculoskeletal pain. Patient-reported outcomes, such as the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), allow us to assess shoulder pain in a clinical setting. Since the SPADI was developed in English, many cultures have cross-culturally adapted the SPADI for clinical use. The purpose of this review was to assess the translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedures and measurement properties of the adapted SPADI. Methods A systematic review was performed on cultural adaptations of the SPADI accessible through MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and/or Google Scholar. Included were prospective cohort studies that used an adapted version of the SPADI. All studies were evaluated according to the guidelines for cross-cultural adaptations and the guidelines for measurement properties. Results The search retrieved 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria. According to the recommended guidelines for cross-cultural adaptations, 16 studies performed 100% of the steps and 1 study performed 80% of the steps. When evaluating the studies’ psychometric properties based on the quality criteria, none of the studies reported all recommended measurement properties. The measurement property of reliability was reported fully by 74% of studies. Internal consistency was fully reported by 74% of studies. None of the studies were able to fully report responsiveness, agreement and/or construct validity. Conclusions Whilst the majority of studies followed proper translation procedures, testing of the measurement properties were inadequate. Therefore, it is recommended that the current adapted versions of the SPADI undergo further evaluation before use in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩部疼痛和残疾指数的跨文化适应和测量特性的系统综述
肩部是肌肉骨骼疼痛的主要部位。患者报告的结果,如肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI),使我们能够在临床环境中评估肩痛。由于SPADI是在英语中开发的,许多文化已经跨文化地适应了SPADI的临床应用。本综述的目的是评估SPADI的翻译和跨文化适应过程和测量特性。方法通过MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE和/或Google Scholar对SPADI的文化适应性进行系统评价。纳入了使用SPADI改编版的前瞻性队列研究。所有研究均根据跨文化适应指南和测量特性指南进行评估。结果检索到19项符合纳入标准的研究。根据推荐的跨文化适应指南,16项研究完成了100%的步骤,1项研究完成了80%的步骤。当根据质量标准评估研究的心理测量特性时,没有一项研究报告了所有推荐的测量特性。74%的研究充分报告了可靠性的测量特性。74%的研究报告了内部一致性。没有一项研究能够完全报告反应性、一致性和/或结构效度。虽然大多数研究遵循适当的翻译程序,但测量特性的测试是不充分的。因此,建议目前的SPADI改编版本在临床应用前进行进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
A survey of practice on the use of condition-specific patient reported outcome measures with patients who have distal radius fractures. The effect of preoperative interventions on postoperative outcomes following elective hand surgery: A systematic review. Exploring patient perception of decision-making in carpal tunnel release surgery: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Rehabilitation of stage-one scapholunate instability (ReSOS): An online survey of UK practice. Production time and practicability of 3D-Printed wrist orthoses versus low temperature thermoplastic wrist orthoses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1