How Does Disclosure of Component Auditor Use Affect Nonprofessional Investors' Perceptions and Behavior?

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory Pub Date : 2020-07-29 DOI:10.2308/ajpt-18-116
C. Hux
{"title":"How Does Disclosure of Component Auditor Use Affect Nonprofessional Investors' Perceptions and Behavior?","authors":"C. Hux","doi":"10.2308/ajpt-18-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Drawing on prior research and source credibility theory, this study examines nonprofessional investors' acquisition and evaluation of component auditor use as disclosed in Form AP, and whether and how this evaluation influences their investment decisions. I find that very few investors voluntarily access component auditor information. When asked to review the Form AP, investors perceive the audit team as more trustworthy when a component auditor is not used, leading them to perceive the audited financial statements as more reliable. However, the perceived competence of the audit team and investment behavior are not affected by component auditor use. Regulators express concerns regarding component auditor use, but results suggest that while investors share some concerns about the audit, their concerns are not significant enough to influence investment behavior, which complements archival research. Results also suggest that component auditor use could have an unintended consequence for the lead auditor's responsibility for the audit.\n JEL Classifications: M42; M4.","PeriodicalId":48142,"journal":{"name":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-18-116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Drawing on prior research and source credibility theory, this study examines nonprofessional investors' acquisition and evaluation of component auditor use as disclosed in Form AP, and whether and how this evaluation influences their investment decisions. I find that very few investors voluntarily access component auditor information. When asked to review the Form AP, investors perceive the audit team as more trustworthy when a component auditor is not used, leading them to perceive the audited financial statements as more reliable. However, the perceived competence of the audit team and investment behavior are not affected by component auditor use. Regulators express concerns regarding component auditor use, but results suggest that while investors share some concerns about the audit, their concerns are not significant enough to influence investment behavior, which complements archival research. Results also suggest that component auditor use could have an unintended consequence for the lead auditor's responsibility for the audit. JEL Classifications: M42; M4.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组成部分审计师使用情况的披露如何影响非专业投资者的认知和行为?
利用先前的研究和来源可信度理论,本研究考察了非专业投资者对AP表中披露的成分审计师使用的获取和评估,以及这种评估是否以及如何影响他们的投资决策。我发现很少有投资者自愿访问组件审计信息。当被要求审查AP表时,当不使用组件审计员时,投资者认为审计团队更值得信赖,导致他们认为经审计的财务报表更可靠。然而,审计团队的感知能力和投资行为不受组成部分审计师使用的影响。监管机构对成分审计师的使用表示担忧,但结果表明,尽管投资者对审计有一些担忧,但他们的担忧不足以影响投资行为,这是对档案研究的补充。结果还表明,成分审计师的使用可能对首席审计师的审计责任产生意想不到的后果。JEL分类:M42;M4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: AUDITING contains technical articles as well as news and reports on current activities of the association.
期刊最新文献
Attracting the Next Generation of Accountants: The Joint Impact of Sustainability Emphasis and Social Value Orientation on Accounting Career Perceptions Cataloging the Marketplace of Assurance Services Informativeness of Key Audit Matters: Evidence from China The Value of Auditor Verification Amid Economic Uncertainty: International Evidence from Small Businesses Covers and Front Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1