Forced migrations of Georgia and Ukraine: reasons for the emergence, process features, implications for countries

{"title":"Forced migrations of Georgia and Ukraine: reasons for the emergence, process features, implications for countries","authors":"","doi":"10.26565/2410-7360-2020-52-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to analyze the causes, current realities and consequences of forced migrations of Georgia and Ukraine in order to identify key strategies for resolving the socio-economic problems of internally displaced persons and transforming them from a “problem vulnerable group” into an indicator of socio-economic development of the countries. Methodology. The study was conducted using a set of multidisciplinary approaches and methods. The paper was used philosophical, general scientific and concrete scientific research methods. Among them: methods of analysis and synthesis, comparative geographical method, mathematical and statistical, graphical method, problem method and some others. Results. Forced migration in Georgia and Ukraine is associated with armed conflicts, which were supported by the separatist sentiments of the part of the population. The center of the military confrontation in Georgia in 1989-1992 was the Tskhinvali region (South Ossetia), and in 1992-1993 – Abkhazia. In 2008, an armed conflict arose between Georgia, Russia and the separatist groups of South Ossetia, referred to as the Russian-Georgian war. In 2014, the Donbass (Donetsk and Luhansk regions) became a center of hostilities in Ukraine. Because of such military conflicts, millions of people have become internally displaced persons – a socially vulnerable category of the population. Analysis of the structural features of the IDPs of Georgia and Ukraine shows the unevenness of their territorial distribution: IDPs are settled in large cities close to their previous homes and almost completely ignore the countryside. Such resettlement speaks about possible intentions to return to their previous places of residence. As a result of the displacement of IDPs, a large burden on the social and economic spheres is observed in parts of Donetsk and Luhansk, as well as Kharkiv regions, the city of Kiev. A similar picture is observed in Georgia: IDPs are settled closer to the occupied regions of Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali region, in large cities and districts of Tbilisi, Samegrelo-Zemo, Svaneti and Imereti. IDPs have become a real challenge for both countries, with which the government could not finally cope. Unresolved in both countries are the housing problems of IDPs. In Ukraine, in addition to the housing problem, IDPs face acute problems with determining their status, social benefits, and employment. Ignoring the solution of these problems leads to increased tension in society, conflicts at the local level between the migrants and the local population, and, as a consequence, to repeated internal displacement. Resolving the problems of forced migrants should be the first line of policy with IDPs. Scientific novelty. a comprehensive comparative analysis of forced migration of Georgia and Ukraine related to military conflicts in the paper was carried out for the first time. The methodology of human-geographical research of migration processes, in particular forced migration, has been improved. The application of the joint experience of Georgia and Ukraine in solving the problems of IDPs was further developed. Practical significance. Studying the joint experience of countries in solving the socio-economic problems of IDPs, the features of their integration and adaptation will contribute to a deeper analysis of these processes at all levels of territorial organization, ensuring the erasing of borders between such a category as \"migrants\" and \"ordinary population\". This paper is only a part of the comprehensive study of the problems of IDPs, so the next step will be a study of the features of IDP integration in the host communities of Georgia and the implementation of this experience for Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":52802,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogouniversitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Radiofizika ta elektronika","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogouniversitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Radiofizika ta elektronika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2020-52-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the causes, current realities and consequences of forced migrations of Georgia and Ukraine in order to identify key strategies for resolving the socio-economic problems of internally displaced persons and transforming them from a “problem vulnerable group” into an indicator of socio-economic development of the countries. Methodology. The study was conducted using a set of multidisciplinary approaches and methods. The paper was used philosophical, general scientific and concrete scientific research methods. Among them: methods of analysis and synthesis, comparative geographical method, mathematical and statistical, graphical method, problem method and some others. Results. Forced migration in Georgia and Ukraine is associated with armed conflicts, which were supported by the separatist sentiments of the part of the population. The center of the military confrontation in Georgia in 1989-1992 was the Tskhinvali region (South Ossetia), and in 1992-1993 – Abkhazia. In 2008, an armed conflict arose between Georgia, Russia and the separatist groups of South Ossetia, referred to as the Russian-Georgian war. In 2014, the Donbass (Donetsk and Luhansk regions) became a center of hostilities in Ukraine. Because of such military conflicts, millions of people have become internally displaced persons – a socially vulnerable category of the population. Analysis of the structural features of the IDPs of Georgia and Ukraine shows the unevenness of their territorial distribution: IDPs are settled in large cities close to their previous homes and almost completely ignore the countryside. Such resettlement speaks about possible intentions to return to their previous places of residence. As a result of the displacement of IDPs, a large burden on the social and economic spheres is observed in parts of Donetsk and Luhansk, as well as Kharkiv regions, the city of Kiev. A similar picture is observed in Georgia: IDPs are settled closer to the occupied regions of Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali region, in large cities and districts of Tbilisi, Samegrelo-Zemo, Svaneti and Imereti. IDPs have become a real challenge for both countries, with which the government could not finally cope. Unresolved in both countries are the housing problems of IDPs. In Ukraine, in addition to the housing problem, IDPs face acute problems with determining their status, social benefits, and employment. Ignoring the solution of these problems leads to increased tension in society, conflicts at the local level between the migrants and the local population, and, as a consequence, to repeated internal displacement. Resolving the problems of forced migrants should be the first line of policy with IDPs. Scientific novelty. a comprehensive comparative analysis of forced migration of Georgia and Ukraine related to military conflicts in the paper was carried out for the first time. The methodology of human-geographical research of migration processes, in particular forced migration, has been improved. The application of the joint experience of Georgia and Ukraine in solving the problems of IDPs was further developed. Practical significance. Studying the joint experience of countries in solving the socio-economic problems of IDPs, the features of their integration and adaptation will contribute to a deeper analysis of these processes at all levels of territorial organization, ensuring the erasing of borders between such a category as "migrants" and "ordinary population". This paper is only a part of the comprehensive study of the problems of IDPs, so the next step will be a study of the features of IDP integration in the host communities of Georgia and the implementation of this experience for Ukraine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
格鲁吉亚和乌克兰的被迫移徙:出现的原因、过程特点、对各国的影响
本文的目的是分析格鲁吉亚和乌克兰被迫移徙的原因、现状和后果,以确定解决国内流离失所者的社会经济问题的关键战略,并将他们从“问题弱势群体”转变为国家社会经济发展的指标。该研究采用了一套多学科的方法和方法。本文采用了哲学、一般科学和具体科学的研究方法。其中有:分析综合方法、比较地理方法、数理统计方法、图解法、问题法等。格鲁吉亚和乌克兰境内的被迫移徙与武装冲突有关,而武装冲突得到了部分人口的分离主义情绪的支持。1989-1992年格鲁吉亚军事冲突的中心是茨欣瓦利地区(南奥塞梯),1992-1993年是阿布哈兹。2008年,格鲁吉亚、俄罗斯和南奥塞梯分离组织之间爆发了武装冲突,被称为俄罗斯-格鲁吉亚战争。2014年,顿巴斯(顿涅茨克和卢甘斯克地区)成为乌克兰敌对行动的中心。由于这种军事冲突,数以百万计的人成为国内流离失所者,这是人口中社会脆弱的一类。对格鲁吉亚和乌克兰境内流离失所者结构特征的分析表明,他们的领土分布不均衡:境内流离失所者定居在靠近他们以前家园的大城市,几乎完全忽视农村。这种重新安置表明他们可能打算返回以前的居住地。由于国内流离失所者的流离失所,顿涅茨克和卢甘斯克部分地区以及哈尔科夫地区和基辅市的社会和经济领域出现了巨大的负担。格鲁吉亚也出现了类似的情况:国内流离失所者在靠近阿布哈兹和茨欣瓦利被占领地区、第比利斯、萨梅格雷罗-泽莫、斯瓦涅季和伊梅列季等大城市和地区定居。国内流离失所者已经成为两国面临的真正挑战,政府最终无法应对。这两个国家都没有解决国内流离失所者的住房问题。在乌克兰,除了住房问题外,国内流离失所者还面临着确定其地位、社会福利和就业的严峻问题。忽视这些问题的解决导致社会紧张局势加剧,导致移徙者和当地居民之间在地方一级发生冲突,并因此导致国内一再流离失所。解决被迫移徙者的问题应该是处理国内流离失所者的首要政策。科学的新奇。本文首次对与军事冲突有关的格鲁吉亚和乌克兰被迫移徙问题进行了全面的比较分析。关于移徙过程,特别是被迫移徙的人类-地理研究方法已得到改进。格鲁吉亚和乌克兰在解决国内流离失所者问题方面的共同经验得到进一步发展。现实意义。研究各国在解决国内流离失所者的社会经济问题方面的共同经验及其融合和适应的特点将有助于更深入地分析领土组织各级的这些过程,确保消除诸如“移徙者”和“普通人口”一类之间的界限。本文只是国内流离失所者问题综合研究的一部分,因此下一步将是研究格鲁吉亚收容社区国内流离失所者融入的特点以及在乌克兰实施这一经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Geochemical features of the accumulation and migration of heavy metals in the peats of the Lviv region Height differentiation of valley-river landscapes of the right-bank Ukraine Problems of spatially distributed quantitative evaluation of soil erosion losses Improving of ecological and economic management of land resources by with zonal aspect New frameworks and experiences in local planning: Luhansk region and the state of main instruments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1