Optimum insulation thickness of external walls by integrating indoor moisture buffering effect: a case study in the hot-summer-cold-winter zone of China

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1631/2023.A2200158
Yan Feng, Zitao Yu, Jiang Lu, Xu Xu
{"title":"Optimum insulation thickness of external walls by integrating indoor moisture buffering effect: a case study in the hot-summer-cold-winter zone of China","authors":"Yan Feng, Zitao Yu, Jiang Lu, Xu Xu","doi":"10.1631/2023.A2200158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the high-humidity, hot-summer-cold-winter (HSCW) zone of China, the moisture buffering effect in the envelope is found to be significant in optimum insulation thickness. However, few studies have considered the effects of indoor moisture buffering on the optimum insulation thickness and energy consumption. In this study, we considered the energy load of an exterior wall under moisture transfer from the outdoor to the indoor environment. An optimum insulation thickness was obtained by integrating the P1−P2 model. A residential building was selected for the case study to verify the proposed method. Finally, a comparison was made with two other widely used methods, namely the transient heat transfer model (TH) and the coupled heat and moisture transfer model (CHM). The results indicated that the indoor moisture buffering effect on the optimum insulation thickness is 2.54 times greater than the moisture buffering effect in the envelope, and the two moisture buffering effects make opposing contributions to the optimum insulation thickness. Therefore, when TH or CHM was used without considering the indoor moisture buffering effect, the optimum insulation thickness of the southern wall under one air change per hour (1 ACH) and 100% normal heat source may be overestimated by 2.13% to 3. 59%, and the annual energy load on a single wall may be underestimated by 10.10% to 11.44%. The decrease of airtightness and the increase of indoor heat sources may result in a slight reduction of optimum insulation thickness. This study will enable professionals to consider the effects of moisture buffering on the design of insulation thickness.","PeriodicalId":17508,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A","volume":"104 1","pages":"998 - 1012"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1631/2023.A2200158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the high-humidity, hot-summer-cold-winter (HSCW) zone of China, the moisture buffering effect in the envelope is found to be significant in optimum insulation thickness. However, few studies have considered the effects of indoor moisture buffering on the optimum insulation thickness and energy consumption. In this study, we considered the energy load of an exterior wall under moisture transfer from the outdoor to the indoor environment. An optimum insulation thickness was obtained by integrating the P1−P2 model. A residential building was selected for the case study to verify the proposed method. Finally, a comparison was made with two other widely used methods, namely the transient heat transfer model (TH) and the coupled heat and moisture transfer model (CHM). The results indicated that the indoor moisture buffering effect on the optimum insulation thickness is 2.54 times greater than the moisture buffering effect in the envelope, and the two moisture buffering effects make opposing contributions to the optimum insulation thickness. Therefore, when TH or CHM was used without considering the indoor moisture buffering effect, the optimum insulation thickness of the southern wall under one air change per hour (1 ACH) and 100% normal heat source may be overestimated by 2.13% to 3. 59%, and the annual energy load on a single wall may be underestimated by 10.10% to 11.44%. The decrease of airtightness and the increase of indoor heat sources may result in a slight reduction of optimum insulation thickness. This study will enable professionals to consider the effects of moisture buffering on the design of insulation thickness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合室内湿缓冲效果的外墙最佳保温厚度——以中国夏热冬冷地区为例
在中国高湿、夏热冬冷地区,最佳保温厚度对围护结构的湿缓冲作用显著。然而,很少有研究考虑室内湿缓冲对最佳保温厚度和能耗的影响。在本研究中,我们考虑了湿气从室外转移到室内环境下外墙的能量负荷。通过对P1−P2模型进行积分,得到了最佳保温厚度。选择一个住宅楼作为案例研究来验证所提出的方法。最后,与另外两种广泛使用的方法,即瞬态传热模型(TH)和热湿耦合传递模型(CHM)进行了比较。结果表明,室内湿缓冲作用对最佳保温厚度的影响是围护结构湿缓冲作用的2.54倍,两种湿缓冲作用对最佳保温厚度的贡献相反。因此,在不考虑室内湿缓冲作用的情况下,采用TH或CHM时,每小时换气一次(1 ACH)、100%正常热源条件下的南墙最佳保温厚度可能高估2.13% ~ 3。59%,单墙年能量负荷可能被低估10.10% ~ 11.44%。气密性的降低和室内热源的增加可能导致最佳保温厚度的轻微降低。本研究将使专业人员能够考虑湿缓冲对保温厚度设计的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
2964
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A covers research in Applied Physics, Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Environmental Science and Energy, Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, etc.
期刊最新文献
A novel approach for the optimal arrangement of tube bundles in a 1000-MW condenser Influence of overhanging tool length and vibrator material on electromechanical impedance and amplitude prediction in ultrasonic spindle vibrator Dynamics of buoyancy-driven microflow in a narrow annular space Key technologies and development trends of the soft abrasive flow finishing method Solid-liquid flow characteristics and sticking-force analysis of valve-core fitting clearance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1