Pharmacognostic Evaluation of the Leaves of Coccinia barteri Hook F (Cucurbitaceae)

Onugwu Obinna, Obi Patrick Ebele, Onugwu Adaeze Linda
{"title":"Pharmacognostic Evaluation of the Leaves of Coccinia barteri Hook F (Cucurbitaceae)","authors":"Onugwu Obinna, Obi Patrick Ebele, Onugwu Adaeze Linda","doi":"10.9734/jamps/2023/v25i6625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In general, Coccinia barteri is offered and sold in its raw form. This natural form could be adulterated, substituted, or contaminated. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to use pharmacognostic analyses to verify the authenticity of the leaves of the Coccinia barteri plant. \nMethods: The organoleptic studies were carried out through sensory organs. Histological analyses were conducted by microscopic examination of the specimen mounted on hand slides. Phytochemical screening and chemomicroscopic evaluation were also carried out using various standard methods. \nResults: The leaves of Coccinia barteri come in a range of forms and sizes. They are lustrous, bright, and dark green. They are also tiny and feature opposite imparipinnate compound leaves. The organoleptic evaluation showed a leafy odour and an astringent taste. Microscopic evaluation showed glandular trichomes, wavy epidermal cells, and anomocytic stomata. The leaf had anomocytic stomata and hypostomatic. with an average stomatal number, index, density, length, width and size of 13.75 ± 0.40%, 15.44 ± 0.42 mm-2, 80.88±2.82 mm-2, 29.26µm, 26.17 ± 0.4 µm and 766.38± 39.49 µm, respectively. \nThe phytochemical screening revealed the presence of phenols, terpenoids, saponins, alkaloids, proteins, glycosides, and flavonoids, while tannins and fixed oils were not detected. Chemotaxonomic studies showed the presence of starch grains, lignified tissues, calcium oxalates, gum, and the absence of protein and oil globules. \nAnalytical evaluation of the leaves of Coccinia barteri produced 7.00% total ash, 0.93% acid insoluble ash, 2.96% water soluble ash, 8.40% moisture content, 29.67% alcohol extractive value, 40.17% water extractive value, and 21.00% ethyl acetate extractive value. \nConclusion: This study provides information on the morphology, microscopic, and phytochemical profile of the leaves of Coccinia barteri.","PeriodicalId":14903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jamps/2023/v25i6625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In general, Coccinia barteri is offered and sold in its raw form. This natural form could be adulterated, substituted, or contaminated. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to use pharmacognostic analyses to verify the authenticity of the leaves of the Coccinia barteri plant. Methods: The organoleptic studies were carried out through sensory organs. Histological analyses were conducted by microscopic examination of the specimen mounted on hand slides. Phytochemical screening and chemomicroscopic evaluation were also carried out using various standard methods. Results: The leaves of Coccinia barteri come in a range of forms and sizes. They are lustrous, bright, and dark green. They are also tiny and feature opposite imparipinnate compound leaves. The organoleptic evaluation showed a leafy odour and an astringent taste. Microscopic evaluation showed glandular trichomes, wavy epidermal cells, and anomocytic stomata. The leaf had anomocytic stomata and hypostomatic. with an average stomatal number, index, density, length, width and size of 13.75 ± 0.40%, 15.44 ± 0.42 mm-2, 80.88±2.82 mm-2, 29.26µm, 26.17 ± 0.4 µm and 766.38± 39.49 µm, respectively. The phytochemical screening revealed the presence of phenols, terpenoids, saponins, alkaloids, proteins, glycosides, and flavonoids, while tannins and fixed oils were not detected. Chemotaxonomic studies showed the presence of starch grains, lignified tissues, calcium oxalates, gum, and the absence of protein and oil globules. Analytical evaluation of the leaves of Coccinia barteri produced 7.00% total ash, 0.93% acid insoluble ash, 2.96% water soluble ash, 8.40% moisture content, 29.67% alcohol extractive value, 40.17% water extractive value, and 21.00% ethyl acetate extractive value. Conclusion: This study provides information on the morphology, microscopic, and phytochemical profile of the leaves of Coccinia barteri.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葫芦科巴氏球虫叶片的生药学评价
背景:一般情况下,易氏球菌以其原始形式提供和销售。这种天然形式可能被掺假、取代或污染。因此,本研究的目的是利用生药学分析来验证巴氏球虫植物叶片的真实性。方法:通过感觉器官进行感官研究。组织学分析是通过显微镜检查的标本安装在手载玻片。采用各种标准方法进行植物化学筛选和化学显微评价。结果:巴氏球虫的叶片有多种形态和大小。它们是有光泽的,明亮的,深绿色的。它们也很小,具有相对的不完全复叶。感官评价显示叶子气味和涩味。镜下观察可见腺状毛状体、波状表皮细胞和不规则气孔。叶片有不规则气孔和低气孔。平均气孔数、指数、密度、长度、宽度和大小分别为13.75±0.40%、15.44±0.42 mm-2、80.88±2.82 mm-2、29.26µm、26.17±0.4µm和766.38±39.49µm。经植物化学筛选,未检出单宁和固定油,但未检出酚类、萜类、皂苷类、生物碱类、蛋白质类、糖苷类和黄酮类。化学分类研究表明存在淀粉颗粒、木质化组织、草酸钙、树胶,而不存在蛋白质和油球。分析评价,巴氏球虫叶片总灰分为7.00%,酸不溶灰分为0.93%,水溶性灰分为2.96%,水分含量为8.40%,醇提取值为29.67%,水提取值为40.17%,乙酸乙酯提取值为21.00%。结论:本研究提供了巴氏球虫叶片的形态、显微和植物化学特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Compliance and Performance of 0.5 mL AD Syringes: A Global Standards Review Acute Toxicity, Antioxidant and Vasodilatory Properties of Sclerocarya birrea (A. rich.) Hochst (Anacardiaceae) Trunk Bark’s Aqueous Decoction Towards Effective Healthcare Delivery: An Assessment of Public Perception of Pharmacist’s Role in Nigeria Multiple Drug Resistance in Burn Patients In-Process Quality Checks and Post-Market Surveillance of Artemether-Lumefantrine Fixed-dose Combination Tablets and Suspensions: Current Procedures, Successes, Advances, and Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1