Effect of six month storage on microtensile bond strength of new elective etching adhesive system on dentin in self-etching or etch-and-rinse approach

Leonardo Colombo Zeidan , André Figueiredo Reis , Alessandra Cassoni , José Augusto Rodrigues
{"title":"Effect of six month storage on microtensile bond strength of new elective etching adhesive system on dentin in self-etching or etch-and-rinse approach","authors":"Leonardo Colombo Zeidan ,&nbsp;André Figueiredo Reis ,&nbsp;Alessandra Cassoni ,&nbsp;José Augusto Rodrigues","doi":"10.1016/j.sjdr.2016.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin of an elective etching adhesive system applied in etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etching (SE) mode after 6-months of storage in water. Thirty-six caries-free, human third molars were collected and stored in a 0.1% thymol solution. Dentin surfaces were exposed by 600-grit silicon carbide paper and teeth were divided into six groups (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->6), according to the adhesive systems: a 2-step SE system, Clearfil SE Bond (CSE); a 1-step SE adhesive Adper Prompt L-Pop (LPOP); Scotchbond Universal applied as a 1-step SE adhesive (SBU-SE) and applied as a 2-step ER adhesive (SBU-ER); and two 2-step ER adhesives: Adper Single Bond Plus (SBP) and Optibond Solo Plus (OSP). Composite build-ups were constructed with TPH3 and cured in three increments of 2<!--> <!-->mm each. Specimens were sectioned with a slow-speed diamond saw under water in <em>X</em> and <em>Y</em> directions to obtain bonded beams that were tested to failure in tension at a crosshead speed of 1.0<!--> <!-->mm/min after one week or 6 months of storage in water. Statistical analyses were computed using Repeated-Measures ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD Tests (<em>α</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.05). There were no significant differences between 1-week and 6-months. SBU-ER and SBUSE showed the highest μTBS values and statistically differed from LPOP (Fisher’s LSD). The SBP, OSP, and CSE groups showed intermediary μTBS and did not differ statistically from SBU-ER, SBUSE or LPOP, which presented the lowest μTBS values. The use of elective etching adhesive system in dentin with the etch-and-rinse or self-etching approach did not compromise the bond strength and showed stable bonds after six months of storage in water.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101249,"journal":{"name":"The Saudi Journal for Dental Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"Pages 5-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.sjdr.2016.06.006","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Saudi Journal for Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352003516300272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin of an elective etching adhesive system applied in etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etching (SE) mode after 6-months of storage in water. Thirty-six caries-free, human third molars were collected and stored in a 0.1% thymol solution. Dentin surfaces were exposed by 600-grit silicon carbide paper and teeth were divided into six groups (n = 6), according to the adhesive systems: a 2-step SE system, Clearfil SE Bond (CSE); a 1-step SE adhesive Adper Prompt L-Pop (LPOP); Scotchbond Universal applied as a 1-step SE adhesive (SBU-SE) and applied as a 2-step ER adhesive (SBU-ER); and two 2-step ER adhesives: Adper Single Bond Plus (SBP) and Optibond Solo Plus (OSP). Composite build-ups were constructed with TPH3 and cured in three increments of 2 mm each. Specimens were sectioned with a slow-speed diamond saw under water in X and Y directions to obtain bonded beams that were tested to failure in tension at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min after one week or 6 months of storage in water. Statistical analyses were computed using Repeated-Measures ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD Tests (α = 0.05). There were no significant differences between 1-week and 6-months. SBU-ER and SBUSE showed the highest μTBS values and statistically differed from LPOP (Fisher’s LSD). The SBP, OSP, and CSE groups showed intermediary μTBS and did not differ statistically from SBU-ER, SBUSE or LPOP, which presented the lowest μTBS values. The use of elective etching adhesive system in dentin with the etch-and-rinse or self-etching approach did not compromise the bond strength and showed stable bonds after six months of storage in water.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型选择性蚀刻胶体系在自蚀刻或蚀刻-冲洗方法下对牙本质微拉伸结合强度的影响
本研究的目的是评价选择性蚀刻胶体系在蚀刻-冲洗(ER)或自蚀刻(SE)模式下在水中保存6个月后与牙本质的微拉伸结合强度(μTBS)。收集36颗无龋的人第三磨牙,保存在0.1%百里酚溶液中。牙本质表面用600粒碳化硅纸暴露,根据粘接系统分为6组(n = 6):两步SE系统,Clearfil SE Bond (CSE);1步SE胶粘剂Adper Prompt L-Pop (LPOP);Scotchbond Universal作为1步SE粘合剂(SBU-SE)和作为2步ER粘合剂(SBU-ER)应用;以及两种双步ER胶粘剂:Adper Single Bond Plus (SBP)和Optibond Solo Plus (OSP)。用TPH3构建复合材料,并以每次2 mm的三次增量进行固化。用慢速金刚石锯在水下对试件进行X、Y方向的切割,得到粘结梁,在水中保存1周或6个月后,以1.0 mm/min的十字速度进行拉伸破坏试验。统计学分析采用重复测量方差分析(Repeated-Measures ANOVA)和Fisher’s LSD检验(α = 0.05)。1周与6个月无显著差异。SBU-ER和sbu - use的μTBS值最高,与LPOP (Fisher’s LSD)有统计学差异。SBP、OSP和CSE组表现为中间μTBS,与SBU-ER、sbu - use和LPOP组的μTBS值最低,差异无统计学意义。在牙本质中使用选择性蚀刻胶粘剂系统与蚀刻-冲洗或自蚀刻方法不影响粘结强度,并且在水中储存六个月后显示出稳定的粘结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Association between human herpes virus and aggressive periodontitis: A systematic review Compliance of dental laboratory technicians with dentists’ instructions for fabrication of a PFM crown The effect of plasma treatment and bioglass paste on enamel white spot lesions Comparison of root canal apical transportation associated with Wave One, ProTaper Next, TF, and OneShape nickel–titanium instruments in curved canals of extracted teeth: A radiographic evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1