Illustrating Productive and Unproductive Cognitive Interactions in an Online Intermediate Algebra Course

Q3 Mathematics PRIMUS Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1080/10511970.2023.2214897
Jennifer L. Nimtz
{"title":"Illustrating Productive and Unproductive Cognitive Interactions in an Online Intermediate Algebra Course","authors":"Jennifer L. Nimtz","doi":"10.1080/10511970.2023.2214897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Universities have drawn on an assortment of strategies to address the learning challenges and high attrition rates of developmental mathematics students. One of those strategies has been utilizing computer adaptive instruction (CAI) mathematics software. Reports about the efficacy of CAI vary from glowing to unfavorable. This article presents an instrumental case study, meaning that the purpose is to examine and describe a single case in depth to explain observed phenomena and illustrate a theory [Baxter and Jack 2008. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and Implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report. 14(4): 544–559]. The phenomena described in this article is productive and unproductive student interactions with a CAI environment. The vignettes in this article illustrate how students, even the same student, can have both productive and unproductive interactions with a CAI system. The vignettes are followed by recommendations for curriculum, instruction, assessment, and further research. Although these recommendations are gathered from observations of student interactions with CAI software in an asynchronous online Intermediate Algebra course, the observations have implications for different modes of instruction (e.g., synchronous online, flipped, hybrid, or face-to-face) that utilize online homework systems.","PeriodicalId":39375,"journal":{"name":"PRIMUS","volume":"706 1","pages":"997 - 1021"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRIMUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2023.2214897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Universities have drawn on an assortment of strategies to address the learning challenges and high attrition rates of developmental mathematics students. One of those strategies has been utilizing computer adaptive instruction (CAI) mathematics software. Reports about the efficacy of CAI vary from glowing to unfavorable. This article presents an instrumental case study, meaning that the purpose is to examine and describe a single case in depth to explain observed phenomena and illustrate a theory [Baxter and Jack 2008. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and Implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report. 14(4): 544–559]. The phenomena described in this article is productive and unproductive student interactions with a CAI environment. The vignettes in this article illustrate how students, even the same student, can have both productive and unproductive interactions with a CAI system. The vignettes are followed by recommendations for curriculum, instruction, assessment, and further research. Although these recommendations are gathered from observations of student interactions with CAI software in an asynchronous online Intermediate Algebra course, the observations have implications for different modes of instruction (e.g., synchronous online, flipped, hybrid, or face-to-face) that utilize online homework systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
说明在线中级代数课程中有效与非有效的认知互动
大学已经采取了各种各样的策略来解决发展数学学生的学习挑战和高流失率。其中一种策略就是利用计算机自适应教学(CAI)数学软件。关于CAI疗效的报道从发光到不利不一而足。本文提出了一个工具性案例研究,这意味着目的是深入研究和描述一个案例,以解释观察到的现象并说明一个理论[Baxter和Jack 2008]。定性案例研究方法论:研究设计与实施,新手研究者。质量报告,14(4):544-559。本文中描述的现象是学生与CAI环境的有效和非有效的交互。本文中的小插曲说明了学生,甚至是同一个学生,如何与CAI系统进行生产性和非生产性的交互。小品之后是对课程、教学、评估和进一步研究的建议。虽然这些建议是从对异步在线中级代数课程中学生与CAI软件互动的观察中收集的,但这些观察对利用在线作业系统的不同教学模式(例如,同步在线、翻转、混合或面对面)具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PRIMUS
PRIMUS Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Our Journey from Collaborative Coordination to a Specifications-Based Grading Approach in Calculus 1 A Blended Teaching Sequence for Introducing Eigentheory in a Large University Class Inquiry-Based Linear Algebra Teaching and Learning in a Flipped Classroom Framework: A Case Study Sustaining Active Learning in Undergraduate Precalculus: Results and Challenges of a Course Redesign An Application Approach to Teaching Linear Algebra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1