The Idea of “Upright Writing (zhíbǐ, 直筆)” in Joseon Historiography

IF 0.3 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Asia-Pacific Review Pub Date : 2022-04-30 DOI:10.24987/snuacar.2022.4.12.1.367
Jihye Song
{"title":"The Idea of “Upright Writing (zhíbǐ, 直筆)” in Joseon Historiography","authors":"Jihye Song","doi":"10.24987/snuacar.2022.4.12.1.367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“ Upright Writing (zhíb ǐ 直筆 or zhísh ū 直書 ) ” has been referred to as a normative principle for writing history in East Asia. Above all, “ upright writing ” has guided the compilation of the Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty ( 朝鮮王祖實錄 ) . This paper attempts to understand the principle of “ upright writing ” as perceived by the Joseon people. In Joseon, there were two different understandings of “ upright writing. ” One was to write down the most right judgment of the reality without any concealment, which resembled the classical Chinese understanding. The other was to write down the facts not allowing any jurisdiction of a historian, which resembled the understanding of Zhuxi ( 朱熹 ) . These two understandings have competed and collaborated in the political context of Joseon. In the process, they served the political interests of diverse agents and provided a political mechanism for deciding right and wrong. Taking such a historical approach to the principle of “ upright writing ” will allow us to fully savor some critical layers of meaning of the Veritable Records , which has not yet been investigated due to an anachronistic understanding of “ upright writing. ” Abstract","PeriodicalId":43120,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Review","volume":"221 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24987/snuacar.2022.4.12.1.367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“ Upright Writing (zhíb ǐ 直筆 or zhísh ū 直書 ) ” has been referred to as a normative principle for writing history in East Asia. Above all, “ upright writing ” has guided the compilation of the Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty ( 朝鮮王祖實錄 ) . This paper attempts to understand the principle of “ upright writing ” as perceived by the Joseon people. In Joseon, there were two different understandings of “ upright writing. ” One was to write down the most right judgment of the reality without any concealment, which resembled the classical Chinese understanding. The other was to write down the facts not allowing any jurisdiction of a historian, which resembled the understanding of Zhuxi ( 朱熹 ) . These two understandings have competed and collaborated in the political context of Joseon. In the process, they served the political interests of diverse agents and provided a political mechanism for deciding right and wrong. Taking such a historical approach to the principle of “ upright writing ” will allow us to fully savor some critical layers of meaning of the Veritable Records , which has not yet been investigated due to an anachronistic understanding of “ upright writing. ” Abstract
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
朝鲜史学中的“正文”思想(zhíbǐ, g . g .
“正字(zhíb′′舅舅舅舅或zhísh′′舅舅舅舅)”在东亚被称为书写历史的规范原则。最重要的是,“正字”指导了《朝鲜实录》的编纂。本文试图理解朝鲜人民所理解的“正字”原则。在朝鲜,对“正字”有两种不同的理解。一是不加掩饰地写下对现实最正确的判断,类似于中国古典的理解。另一种是记录事实,不允许任何历史学家的管辖,这类似于朱熹的理解。这两种理解在朝鲜的政治环境中既竞争又合作。在这个过程中,它们服务于不同主体的政治利益,并提供了一种决定对错的政治机制。对“正文”原则采取这样的历史方法,将使我们充分体会到由于对“正文”的时代错误理解而尚未进行调查的《实录》的一些关键意义。摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Review
Asia-Pacific Review INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
G20 Summit Places Priority on Avoiding Division G7 Hiroshima Summit 2023: Objectives, Achievements, and Prospects Republic of Korea’s “Anchored Flexibility” Diplomacy The European Union and an “Indo-Pacific” Alignment The Transnistria Problem and the Crisis in Ukraine: Analysis from the Perspective of the Security Dilemma Argument
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1