Negatively-Worded Multiple Choice Questions: An Avoidable Threat to Validity.

Q2 Social Sciences Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation Pub Date : 2017-05-01 DOI:10.7275/5VVY-8613
N. Chiavaroli
{"title":"Negatively-Worded Multiple Choice Questions: An Avoidable Threat to Validity.","authors":"N. Chiavaroli","doi":"10.7275/5VVY-8613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the majority of MCQ writing guides discouraging the use of negatively-worded multiple choice questions (NWQs), they continue to be regularly used both in locally produced examinations and commercially available questions. There are several reasons why the use of NWQs may prove resistant to sound pedagogical advice. Nevertheless, systematic inspection of item-level analysis often reveals anomalous behavior of NWQs on high-stakes examinations, due to otherwise highperforming students selecting the incorrect option for those questions. Highlighting the negative term as commonly recommended does not prevent this, since both anecdotal and empirical evidence suggests that many students answer the question as if it were positively phrased. The continued use of NWQs in high-stakes examinations poses a significant threat to the validity of interpretation based on these assessments. This is a form of ‘construct-irrelevant variance’ within the control of the item writer, and is therefore completely avoidable.","PeriodicalId":20361,"journal":{"name":"Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7275/5VVY-8613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Despite the majority of MCQ writing guides discouraging the use of negatively-worded multiple choice questions (NWQs), they continue to be regularly used both in locally produced examinations and commercially available questions. There are several reasons why the use of NWQs may prove resistant to sound pedagogical advice. Nevertheless, systematic inspection of item-level analysis often reveals anomalous behavior of NWQs on high-stakes examinations, due to otherwise highperforming students selecting the incorrect option for those questions. Highlighting the negative term as commonly recommended does not prevent this, since both anecdotal and empirical evidence suggests that many students answer the question as if it were positively phrased. The continued use of NWQs in high-stakes examinations poses a significant threat to the validity of interpretation based on these assessments. This is a form of ‘construct-irrelevant variance’ within the control of the item writer, and is therefore completely avoidable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消极措辞选择题:对效度的可避免威胁。
尽管大多数MCQ写作指南不鼓励使用否定词的多项选择题(NWQs),但它们继续在本地考试和商业试题中经常使用。nwq的使用可能会对合理的教学建议产生抵触,原因有几个。然而,对项目层面分析的系统检查经常揭示出nwq在高风险考试中的异常行为,这是由于表现优异的学生在这些问题中选择了错误的选项。强调通常推荐的负面术语并不能阻止这种情况,因为轶事和经验证据都表明,许多学生回答这个问题时,好像它是积极的措辞。在高风险考试中继续使用nwq对基于这些评估的解释的有效性构成了重大威胁。这是一种在项目编写者控制范围内的“与结构无关的差异”,因此是完全可以避免的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Feedback is a gift: Do Video-enhanced rubrics result in providing better peer feedback than textual rubrics? Do Loss Aversion and the Ownership Effect Bias Content Validation Procedures Flipping the Feedback: Formative Assessment in a Flipped Freshman Circuits Class Eight issues to consider when developing animated videos for the assessment of complex constructs Variability In The Accuracy Of Self-Assessments Among Low, Moderate, And High Performing Students In University Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1