Prognostic role of primary tumor, nodal neck, and retropharyngeal GTVs for unresectable sinonasal cancers treated with IMRT and chemotherapy

L. Ferella, A. Cavallo, R. Miceli, N. Iacovelli, T. Giandini, E. Pignoli, G. Calareso, P. Bossi, C. Resteghini, G. Gravina, P. Nicolai, P. Castelnuovo, C. Piazza, L. Licitra, C. Fallai, E. Orlandi
{"title":"Prognostic role of primary tumor, nodal neck, and retropharyngeal GTVs for unresectable sinonasal cancers treated with IMRT and chemotherapy","authors":"L. Ferella, A. Cavallo, R. Miceli, N. Iacovelli, T. Giandini, E. Pignoli, G. Calareso, P. Bossi, C. Resteghini, G. Gravina, P. Nicolai, P. Castelnuovo, C. Piazza, L. Licitra, C. Fallai, E. Orlandi","doi":"10.1177/0300891619868006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We evaluated the prognostic role of gross tumor volumes (GTVs) of primary tumor and positive lymph nodes on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in locally advanced unresectable sinonasal cancer (SNC) treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with or without chemotherapy. Methods: Primary tumor GTV (GTV-T), pathologic neck nodes GTV (GTV-N), and positive retropharyngeal nodes GTV (GTV-RPN) of 34 patients with epithelial nonglandular SNC receiving IMRT with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively measured. The GTV variables were analyzed in relation with OS and PFS. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. We also estimated the crude cumulative incidence of locoregional relapses only. The optimal volume cutoff value was determined using an outcome-oriented method among the observed values. Results: GTV-T was significantly associated with decreased OS (P=0.003) and PFS (P=0.003). Moreover, patients with disease total volumes (GTV) smaller than 149.44 cm³ had better OS and PFS than patients with higher volumes (P<0.0001 for both). Neck nodal metastasis impacted on OS and PFS (P=0.030 and P=0.033, respectively), but GTV-N did not (P=0.961; P=0.958). Retropharyngeal nodes metastasis was not associated with prognosis (OS: P=0.400; PFS: P=0.104). When GTV-RPN was added to GTV-N (GTV-TN), a relation with PFS (P=0.041) and a trend toward significance for OS (P=0.075) were found. Conclusions: Our results show that tumor volume is a powerful predictor of outcome in SNC. This could be useful to identify patients with worse prognosis deserving different treatment strategies.","PeriodicalId":23450,"journal":{"name":"Tumori Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"39 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0300891619868006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the prognostic role of gross tumor volumes (GTVs) of primary tumor and positive lymph nodes on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in locally advanced unresectable sinonasal cancer (SNC) treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with or without chemotherapy. Methods: Primary tumor GTV (GTV-T), pathologic neck nodes GTV (GTV-N), and positive retropharyngeal nodes GTV (GTV-RPN) of 34 patients with epithelial nonglandular SNC receiving IMRT with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively measured. The GTV variables were analyzed in relation with OS and PFS. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. We also estimated the crude cumulative incidence of locoregional relapses only. The optimal volume cutoff value was determined using an outcome-oriented method among the observed values. Results: GTV-T was significantly associated with decreased OS (P=0.003) and PFS (P=0.003). Moreover, patients with disease total volumes (GTV) smaller than 149.44 cm³ had better OS and PFS than patients with higher volumes (P<0.0001 for both). Neck nodal metastasis impacted on OS and PFS (P=0.030 and P=0.033, respectively), but GTV-N did not (P=0.961; P=0.958). Retropharyngeal nodes metastasis was not associated with prognosis (OS: P=0.400; PFS: P=0.104). When GTV-RPN was added to GTV-N (GTV-TN), a relation with PFS (P=0.041) and a trend toward significance for OS (P=0.075) were found. Conclusions: Our results show that tumor volume is a powerful predictor of outcome in SNC. This could be useful to identify patients with worse prognosis deserving different treatment strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发肿瘤、结颈和咽后gtv对接受IMRT和化疗的不可切除鼻窦癌的预后影响
背景:我们评估了原发性肿瘤和阳性淋巴结的总肿瘤体积(GTVs)对局部晚期不可切除鼻窦癌(SNC)的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的预后作用,这些鼻窦癌(SNC)接受了明确的调强放疗(IMRT),伴或不伴化疗。方法:回顾性测定34例上皮性非血管性SNC伴或不伴化疗行IMRT的原发肿瘤GTV (GTV- t)、病理性颈部淋巴结GTV (GTV- n)和阳性咽后淋巴结GTV (GTV- rpn)。分析GTV变量与OS和PFS的关系。使用Kaplan-Meier法估计生存曲线,并与log-rank检验进行比较。我们也只估计了局部复发的粗累积发生率。在观测值中采用结果导向法确定最佳体积临界值。结果:GTV-T与OS (P=0.003)和PFS (P=0.003)降低显著相关。疾病总积(GTV)小于149.44 cm³的患者OS和PFS均优于体积较大的患者(P<0.0001)。颈部淋巴结转移对OS和PFS有影响(P=0.030和P=0.033),而GTV-N无影响(P=0.961;P = 0.958)。咽后淋巴结转移与预后无关(OS: P=0.400;PFS: P = 0.104)。将GTV-RPN与GTV-N (GTV-TN)相加,与PFS呈显著相关(P=0.041),与OS呈显著相关(P=0.075)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,肿瘤体积是SNC预后的一个强有力的预测因素。这可能有助于确定预后较差的患者需要不同的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PROACT 2.0: A new open-source tool to improve patient-doctor communication in clinical trials Response to lorlatinib rechallenge in a case of ALK-rearranged metastatic NSCLC with a resistance mutation to second generation TKIs The digital revolution in pathology: Towards a smarter approach to research and treatment The power of art and the powers of adolescents with cancer: Age-specific projects at Italian pediatric oncology centers bgicc 2024 abstracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1