From highly receptive to highly skeptical: Engaging all teachers through responsive PD facilitation

Christine Taylor, Jean S. Lee
{"title":"From highly receptive to highly skeptical: Engaging all teachers through responsive PD facilitation","authors":"Christine Taylor, Jean S. Lee","doi":"10.51272/PMENA.42.2020-332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professional developments (PD) play a central role in efforts to improve teachers’ mathematical content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and beliefs about what it means to ‘do mathematics’ (Ball, 1990; Hill, 2007). Creating Algebra Teaching Communities for Hoosiers was the result of a Math-Science Partnership grant from Indiana’s Department of Education in 2015. The study involved 15 middle and high school urban teachers, with a focus on enriching teachers’ knowledge and skills for teaching algebra. This study examines: How do teacher portraits help facilitate the activities in the PD experience? This study focuses on exploring how PD facilitators used facilitation techniques to support participants based on character portraits (Sztajn, Borko, & Smith (2017), and contributes to an area of research needed on skillful facilitation techniques (e.g., Bobis, 2011; van es, 2014) to prepare and support PD facilitators. Findings culminated in five teacher portraits. Highly Skeptical Teacher (HST) is an experienced teacher but is uncomfortable being observed by colleagues. HST doubts students can be successful with the PD tasks. Others followed the skepticism because of HST’s experience in the classroom. Facilitators probed questions to interrupt preconceived perceptions of students. Cautiously Receptive Teacher (CRT) is eager to apply the theories into practice but struggles to bring ideas into reality in the classroom. CRT is hesitant to try new things, but gradually over time buys into the vision of the PD. Trying out activities with students was the best technique to convince CRT of novel teaching practices. Highly Receptive Teacher (HRT) is highly reflective and collaborative. HRT sees the potential of all students to be mathematical learners and makes connections between teaching, the PD, and everyday life experiences. PD facilitators would ask HRT to point out students’ mathematical thinking. BoxChecker Teacher (BCT) is extremely organized, thrives on explicit directions and timeline, and most comfortable with direct instruction. BCT’s intense focus on clear tasks and schedules, and high anxiety made the group dynamics tense. PD facilitators solicited input from BCT on the clarity of expectations. Lopsided Engager Teacher (LET) has great relationships with all students, even the most disruptive, and is deeply troubled when other teachers do not believe that all students can learn mathematics. LET displays turns of both low engagement and intense engagement. PD facilitators stoked this passion to engage in rich discussions, and showed empathy to situations where relationships take priority over learning. This study begins a conversation about mathematics teaching facilitation and how best to support and facilitate with a wide range of participants.","PeriodicalId":68089,"journal":{"name":"数学教学通讯","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"数学教学通讯","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51272/PMENA.42.2020-332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professional developments (PD) play a central role in efforts to improve teachers’ mathematical content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and beliefs about what it means to ‘do mathematics’ (Ball, 1990; Hill, 2007). Creating Algebra Teaching Communities for Hoosiers was the result of a Math-Science Partnership grant from Indiana’s Department of Education in 2015. The study involved 15 middle and high school urban teachers, with a focus on enriching teachers’ knowledge and skills for teaching algebra. This study examines: How do teacher portraits help facilitate the activities in the PD experience? This study focuses on exploring how PD facilitators used facilitation techniques to support participants based on character portraits (Sztajn, Borko, & Smith (2017), and contributes to an area of research needed on skillful facilitation techniques (e.g., Bobis, 2011; van es, 2014) to prepare and support PD facilitators. Findings culminated in five teacher portraits. Highly Skeptical Teacher (HST) is an experienced teacher but is uncomfortable being observed by colleagues. HST doubts students can be successful with the PD tasks. Others followed the skepticism because of HST’s experience in the classroom. Facilitators probed questions to interrupt preconceived perceptions of students. Cautiously Receptive Teacher (CRT) is eager to apply the theories into practice but struggles to bring ideas into reality in the classroom. CRT is hesitant to try new things, but gradually over time buys into the vision of the PD. Trying out activities with students was the best technique to convince CRT of novel teaching practices. Highly Receptive Teacher (HRT) is highly reflective and collaborative. HRT sees the potential of all students to be mathematical learners and makes connections between teaching, the PD, and everyday life experiences. PD facilitators would ask HRT to point out students’ mathematical thinking. BoxChecker Teacher (BCT) is extremely organized, thrives on explicit directions and timeline, and most comfortable with direct instruction. BCT’s intense focus on clear tasks and schedules, and high anxiety made the group dynamics tense. PD facilitators solicited input from BCT on the clarity of expectations. Lopsided Engager Teacher (LET) has great relationships with all students, even the most disruptive, and is deeply troubled when other teachers do not believe that all students can learn mathematics. LET displays turns of both low engagement and intense engagement. PD facilitators stoked this passion to engage in rich discussions, and showed empathy to situations where relationships take priority over learning. This study begins a conversation about mathematics teaching facilitation and how best to support and facilitate with a wide range of participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从高度接受到高度怀疑:通过响应性PD促进所有教师参与
专业发展(PD)在努力提高教师的数学内容知识、教学内容知识和对“做数学”意味着什么的信念方面发挥着核心作用(Ball, 1990;希尔,2007)。为印第安纳人创建代数教学社区是2015年印第安纳州教育部数学-科学伙伴关系拨款的结果。本研究涉及15名城市初中和高中教师,重点是丰富教师的代数教学知识和技能。本研究探讨:教师画像如何帮助促进PD体验中的活动?本研究的重点是探索PD促进者如何根据人物肖像使用促进技术来支持参与者(Sztajn, Borko, & Smith(2017)),并为熟练的促进技术所需的研究领域做出贡献(例如,Bobis, 2011;van es, 2014)准备和支持PD促进者。调查结果最终形成了五幅教师肖像。高度怀疑型教师(Highly Skeptical Teacher, HST)是一位经验丰富的教师,但不喜欢被同事观察。HST怀疑学生能否成功完成PD任务。由于HST在课堂上的经验,其他人也持怀疑态度。辅导员探究问题,以打断学生先入为主的看法。谨慎接受型教师(CRT)渴望将理论应用到实践中,但却难以在课堂上将思想变为现实。CRT对尝试新事物犹豫不决,但随着时间的推移,它逐渐接受了PD的愿景。与学生一起尝试活动是说服CRT采用新颖教学方法的最佳方法。高接受性教师(HRT)是高度反思和合作的教师。HRT看到了所有学生成为数学学习者的潜力,并将教学、PD和日常生活经验联系起来。PD促进者会要求HRT指出学生的数学思维。BoxChecker老师(BCT)非常有条理,在明确的方向和时间表上茁壮成长,最适合直接指导。BCT对明确的任务和时间表的强烈关注,以及高度焦虑使小组动态紧张。PD促进者就期望的明确性征求了BCT的意见。不平衡参与型教师(LET)与所有学生都有很好的关系,即使是最具破坏性的,当其他老师不相信所有学生都能学习数学时,他会深感困扰。LET表现出低参与度和高参与度的交替。PD促进者激发了这种参与丰富讨论的热情,并对关系优先于学习的情况表现出同情。本研究开始了关于数学教学便利化的对话,以及如何最好地支持和促进广泛的参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22282
期刊最新文献
What makes a mathematics lesson interesting to students? Elementary teachers’ discourse about mathematical reasoning Two prospective middle school teachers reinvent combinatorial formulas: permutations and arrangements Report of a classroom experience for the development of distribution models / Experiencia en el aula para el desarrollo de modelos para el reparto Self-efficacy and the kernel of content knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1