A comparison of IgM anti-P1 immunoblotting and a polymerase chain reaction assay for the diagnosis of acute Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory infection in children

N. Cimolai , C. Trombley , D.G. Mah
{"title":"A comparison of IgM anti-P1 immunoblotting and a polymerase chain reaction assay for the diagnosis of acute Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory infection in children","authors":"N. Cimolai ,&nbsp;C. Trombley ,&nbsp;D.G. Mah","doi":"10.1016/0888-0786(96)87293-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A rapid IgM immunoblotting serological test was compared to a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay of respiratory specimens for the diagnosis of acute <em>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</em> infection. Among 112 paired specimens, the frequency of a positive diagnosis by any method was 7.1%. Both IgM serology and PCR were positive for only two out of eight infected patients. PCR positive, IgM negative patients (4) were ill for an insufficient period to allow the IgM response to be demonstrable (⩽7 days). PCR negative, IgM positive patients (2) were likely to have had negative amplification assays because of the nature of the respiratory specimens. Nasopharyngeal washings uncommonly inhibited PCR amplification. Both rapid serological and genetic amplification assays have a role, together or alone, in the diagnosis of <em>M. pneumoniae</em> infection and paradigms for cost-effective utilization will be required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101161,"journal":{"name":"Serodiagnosis and Immunotherapy in Infectious Disease","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 153-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0888-0786(96)87293-3","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serodiagnosis and Immunotherapy in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0888078696872933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A rapid IgM immunoblotting serological test was compared to a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay of respiratory specimens for the diagnosis of acute Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Among 112 paired specimens, the frequency of a positive diagnosis by any method was 7.1%. Both IgM serology and PCR were positive for only two out of eight infected patients. PCR positive, IgM negative patients (4) were ill for an insufficient period to allow the IgM response to be demonstrable (⩽7 days). PCR negative, IgM positive patients (2) were likely to have had negative amplification assays because of the nature of the respiratory specimens. Nasopharyngeal washings uncommonly inhibited PCR amplification. Both rapid serological and genetic amplification assays have a role, together or alone, in the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection and paradigms for cost-effective utilization will be required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IgM抗p1免疫印迹法与聚合酶链反应法诊断儿童急性肺炎支原体呼吸道感染的比较
将快速IgM免疫印迹血清学试验与呼吸道标本的聚合酶链反应(PCR)试验进行比较,以诊断急性肺炎支原体感染。在112例配对标本中,任一方法的阳性诊断率为7.1%。8名感染者中只有2名IgM血清学和PCR阳性。PCR阳性,IgM阴性的患者(4例)发病时间不足,不足以证明IgM反应(≥7天)。由于呼吸道标本的性质,PCR阴性,IgM阳性的患者(2)可能进行了阴性扩增试验。鼻咽冲洗很少抑制PCR扩增。快速血清学检测和基因扩增检测在诊断肺炎支原体感染中都有作用,无论是一起还是单独,都需要具有成本效益的应用范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subject index Volume contents Author index The value of ELISA vs. negative Coombs findings in the serodiagnosis of human brucellosis Detection of toxoplasma-specific antibody in human saliva using conventional assays
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1