{"title":"On Lumby’s samuel-613","authors":"Gil Toffell","doi":"10.13110/jewifilmnewmedi.4.2.0196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"samuel-613. Directed by Billy Lumby. 2015. UK: Commissioned by Dazed and Confused Magazine. Available online at www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT1BLg9FtNw. 16 minutes.By chance, my first viewing of samuel-6 13 occurred at the end of May 2015-the same week the \"Hasidic driving ban\" story broke as headline news in the UK media. Apparently provoked by the minatory notion of the itinerant independent woman, leaders of the Belz sect issued a letter requesting that mothers desist from driving their children to communal schools in the Haredi heartlands of Stamford Hill in North London, stating that women drivers were in danger of breaching \"traditional rules of modesty.\"1 With the request widely reported as analogous to the state-imposed Wahhabism of Saudi Arabia, and declared to be in contravention of equal rights legislation by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, the Belzer authorities were forced to publicly back down, in a move that leftthe sect appearing decidedly vulnerable to the encroachments of modernity. That the temptations of twenty-first-century metropolitan London might infiltrate Haredi citadels of isolation is the central conceit behind samuel-613. Significantly, the depiction of the havoc such an event might wreak seems symptomatic of trends in thinking about cultural identity in the current moment.With a running time just under sixteen minutes, samuel-613 quickly gets to the point: Shmilu has a problem-he is horny. For most twenty-something Londoners, developing a strategy to tackle such a situation is relatively straightforward; Shmilu, however, is a Haredi Jew living in Stamford Hill. As such his contact with women outside the family is restricted to porn magazines smuggled into his bedroom and anonymously flirting online. Angry and frustrated, he constantly challenges his father's authority, a struggle that culminates in his scandalous wrecking of a Shabbos dinner. Shorn of beard and payot, he strikes out on his own, moving into a high-rise flat where he goes about the work of remaking himself-gorging on bacon and beer. However, following a disastrous date with \"Jezebel\"-his online crush-Shmilu realizes that entry into the goyishe world demands more than purchasing a baseball cap. Cut adrift, he returns to Jewish ritual and dreams about bridging an impossible cultural gap by fantasizing a strictly Orthodox marriage between himself and Jezebel. As Shmuli becomes strung out on pharmaceuticals and descends into derangement, the film ends with the arrival of a hallucinatory flock of parrots, a perverse echo of a joke told by his grandfather at the fateful Shabbos supper a few weeks earlier.While Haredi life has received only minimal attention in mainstream cinema, of those films that have appeared, the narrative of the individual who has strayed \"offthe derech\" is something of a common theme. The derech-Hebrew for path-is the life of devotion to the 613 mitzvot: biblical commandments that range from dietary laws to the injunction that men not shave the hair at the sides of their heads. Adam Vardy's Mendy: A Question of Faith (USA, 2003) and Tony Krawitz's Jewboy (Australia, 2005) are relatively recent examples of this trend; less obscure are Jeremy Kagan's The Chosen (USA, 1981), based on Chaim Potok's bestseller and starring Maximilian Schell and Rod Steiger, and-from the dawn of talking pictures-Al Jolson's desertion of Orthodoxy in The Jazz Singer (Alan Crosland, USA, 1927). Additionally, the trope of juxtaposed Jewish-non-Jewish worlds goes back both to the Yiddish theater and to the \"ghetto movies\" of 1920s Hollywood. In Edward Sloman's 1925 His People (USA), for instance, a pious Lower East Side bookseller despairs over a son's boxing career and love affair with a local Irish girl. For filmmakers interested in exploring a leakage between the boundaries of the socially central and the peripheral, Jews have long proved an appealing device.Given this lineage it would not seem excessive to criticize samuel-613 as being somewhat hackneyed. …","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"95 1","pages":"196 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13110/jewifilmnewmedi.4.2.0196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
samuel-613. Directed by Billy Lumby. 2015. UK: Commissioned by Dazed and Confused Magazine. Available online at www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT1BLg9FtNw. 16 minutes.By chance, my first viewing of samuel-6 13 occurred at the end of May 2015-the same week the "Hasidic driving ban" story broke as headline news in the UK media. Apparently provoked by the minatory notion of the itinerant independent woman, leaders of the Belz sect issued a letter requesting that mothers desist from driving their children to communal schools in the Haredi heartlands of Stamford Hill in North London, stating that women drivers were in danger of breaching "traditional rules of modesty."1 With the request widely reported as analogous to the state-imposed Wahhabism of Saudi Arabia, and declared to be in contravention of equal rights legislation by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, the Belzer authorities were forced to publicly back down, in a move that leftthe sect appearing decidedly vulnerable to the encroachments of modernity. That the temptations of twenty-first-century metropolitan London might infiltrate Haredi citadels of isolation is the central conceit behind samuel-613. Significantly, the depiction of the havoc such an event might wreak seems symptomatic of trends in thinking about cultural identity in the current moment.With a running time just under sixteen minutes, samuel-613 quickly gets to the point: Shmilu has a problem-he is horny. For most twenty-something Londoners, developing a strategy to tackle such a situation is relatively straightforward; Shmilu, however, is a Haredi Jew living in Stamford Hill. As such his contact with women outside the family is restricted to porn magazines smuggled into his bedroom and anonymously flirting online. Angry and frustrated, he constantly challenges his father's authority, a struggle that culminates in his scandalous wrecking of a Shabbos dinner. Shorn of beard and payot, he strikes out on his own, moving into a high-rise flat where he goes about the work of remaking himself-gorging on bacon and beer. However, following a disastrous date with "Jezebel"-his online crush-Shmilu realizes that entry into the goyishe world demands more than purchasing a baseball cap. Cut adrift, he returns to Jewish ritual and dreams about bridging an impossible cultural gap by fantasizing a strictly Orthodox marriage between himself and Jezebel. As Shmuli becomes strung out on pharmaceuticals and descends into derangement, the film ends with the arrival of a hallucinatory flock of parrots, a perverse echo of a joke told by his grandfather at the fateful Shabbos supper a few weeks earlier.While Haredi life has received only minimal attention in mainstream cinema, of those films that have appeared, the narrative of the individual who has strayed "offthe derech" is something of a common theme. The derech-Hebrew for path-is the life of devotion to the 613 mitzvot: biblical commandments that range from dietary laws to the injunction that men not shave the hair at the sides of their heads. Adam Vardy's Mendy: A Question of Faith (USA, 2003) and Tony Krawitz's Jewboy (Australia, 2005) are relatively recent examples of this trend; less obscure are Jeremy Kagan's The Chosen (USA, 1981), based on Chaim Potok's bestseller and starring Maximilian Schell and Rod Steiger, and-from the dawn of talking pictures-Al Jolson's desertion of Orthodoxy in The Jazz Singer (Alan Crosland, USA, 1927). Additionally, the trope of juxtaposed Jewish-non-Jewish worlds goes back both to the Yiddish theater and to the "ghetto movies" of 1920s Hollywood. In Edward Sloman's 1925 His People (USA), for instance, a pious Lower East Side bookseller despairs over a son's boxing career and love affair with a local Irish girl. For filmmakers interested in exploring a leakage between the boundaries of the socially central and the peripheral, Jews have long proved an appealing device.Given this lineage it would not seem excessive to criticize samuel-613 as being somewhat hackneyed. …
塞缪尔- 613。比利·伦比导演,2015年。英国:受Dazed and Confused杂志委托。可在www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT1BLg9FtNw上获得。16分钟。巧合的是,我第一次看《撒母耳-6 - 13》是在2015年5月底,就在同一周,“哈西德派禁止驾驶”的故事成为英国媒体的头条新闻。贝尔兹教派的领袖们显然是被流动的独立女性的威胁性观念激怒了,他们发表了一封信,要求母亲们不要再开车送孩子去位于伦敦北部斯坦福德山的哈瑞迪中心地带的公共学校,称女司机有违反“传统端庄规则”的危险。由于这一要求被广泛报道为类似于沙特阿拉伯国家强加的瓦哈比主义,并被宣布违反了平等与人权委员会(Equality and Human rights Commission)制定的平等权利立法,贝尔泽当局被迫公开让步,此举使该教派在现代性的侵蚀下显得明显脆弱。21世纪伦敦大都市的诱惑可能会渗透到哈雷迪教派与世隔绝的堡垒中,这是《撒母耳613》背后的核心自负。值得注意的是,对此类事件可能造成的破坏的描述似乎是当前思考文化身份的趋势的征兆。在不到16分钟的时间里,塞缪尔-613很快就到了重点:什米卢有一个问题——他很好色。对于大多数20多岁的伦敦人来说,制定应对这种情况的策略相对简单;然而,Shmilu是一个住在斯坦福德山的正统派犹太人。因此,他与家庭以外的女性的接触仅限于偷运到他卧室的色情杂志和匿名在网上调情。愤怒和沮丧的他不断挑战父亲的权威,这场斗争在他破坏安息日晚宴的丑闻中达到高潮。他剃掉了胡子和payot,开始了自己的生活,搬进了一栋高层公寓,在那里他狼吞虎咽地吃着培根和啤酒,开始重塑自己。然而,在与“耶洗别”——他在网上喜欢的人——进行了一次灾难性的约会之后,什米卢意识到,进入非犹太世界需要的不仅仅是买一顶棒球帽。他被切断了联系,回到了犹太仪式,梦想着通过幻想自己和耶洗别之间严格的正统婚姻来弥合不可能的文化鸿沟。随着什穆里逐渐沉迷于药物并陷入精神错乱,影片以一群出现幻觉的鹦鹉结束,这是他祖父在几周前宿命的安息日晚餐上讲的一个笑话的反常呼应。虽然正统派的生活在主流电影中只受到很少的关注,但在那些已经出现的电影中,对“偏离极端”的个人的叙述是一个共同的主题。derech——希伯来语中“道路”的意思——是献身于613条诫命(mitzvot)的生活:从饮食律法到男人不能剃掉头两侧头发的禁令,圣经戒律的范围很广。亚当·瓦尔迪的《门迪:信仰问题》(美国,2003年)和托尼·克拉维茨的《犹太男孩》(澳大利亚,2005年)是这一趋势相对较新的例子;还有杰里米·卡根的《天选之子》(美国,1981年),改编自查伊姆·波托克的畅销书,由马克西米兰·舍尔和罗德·斯泰格主演。还有,在有声电影出现之初,艾尔·乔尔森在《爵士歌手》中抛弃了正统信仰(艾伦·克罗斯兰,美国,1927年)。此外,犹太人和非犹太人世界并列的比喻可以追溯到意第绪语戏剧和20世纪20年代好莱坞的“贫民窟电影”。例如,在爱德华·斯洛曼1925年的《他的人民》(美国)中,一位虔诚的下东区书商对儿子的拳击事业和与当地爱尔兰女孩的恋情感到绝望。对于有兴趣探索社会中心和边缘边界之间的泄漏的电影制作人来说,犹太人长期以来一直是一个有吸引力的工具。考虑到这一血统,批评《撒母耳记》613章有些陈腐似乎并不过分。...
期刊介绍:
Jewish Film & New Media provides an outlet for research into any aspect of Jewish film, television, and new media and is unique in its interdisciplinary nature, exploring the rich and diverse cultural heritage across the globe. The journal is distinctive in bringing together a range of cinemas, televisions, films, programs, and other digital material in one volume and in its positioning of the discussions within a range of contexts—the cultural, historical, textual, and many others.