Influence of Medical Representatives on Prescribing Practices in Tripoli

Ahmed Atia, Malath Gismallah, Esra Almogadmi
{"title":"Influence of Medical Representatives on Prescribing Practices in Tripoli","authors":"Ahmed Atia, Malath Gismallah, Esra Almogadmi","doi":"10.21608/aprh.2021.95357.1140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives. Medical representatives (MRs) have an impact in the medical community in terms of their promotion of medical products. The pattern of choosing to prescribe drugs by doctors may be affected according to the extent to which the representative is convinced the doctor which eventually influence physicians’ prescribing decisions and choice of drugs. The current study aimed to assess the influence of medical representatives on prescribing practice of physicians in health facilities in Tripoli, Libya. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted over a period from Jan to April 2021, targeting different physicians in a number of public hospitals and private clinics in Tripoli. Data were collected using a pre-validated questionnaire and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results. Out of 135 distributed questionnaires, 122 were filled completely giving a response rate of 90.3%. About 36.3% of the respondents were males and 67.2% of them were within the age group of 30–40. The majority of physicians reported that the most common category of drug information was from the internet 78.7%, followed by medical representatives 60.6%, and medical journals 32.8%. The most effective reminder was a product sample (52.5%), leaflet (47.5%), a frequent visit (29.5%), a gift with a corporate logo (27.3%), medical representatives' acceptance of trustworthiness (16.4%), brochures (14.8%), and other approaches (23%). Furthermore, about 73.8 % of physicians were prescribing medications for their patients based on drug company. Conclusion. The outcomes of this study gave insight into prospective target areas for Libyan drug policymakers and regulatory agencies, and to develop a comprehensive guideline for MR interaction with health care professionals, as well as enforcement measures.","PeriodicalId":15017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aprh.2021.95357.1140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and objectives. Medical representatives (MRs) have an impact in the medical community in terms of their promotion of medical products. The pattern of choosing to prescribe drugs by doctors may be affected according to the extent to which the representative is convinced the doctor which eventually influence physicians’ prescribing decisions and choice of drugs. The current study aimed to assess the influence of medical representatives on prescribing practice of physicians in health facilities in Tripoli, Libya. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted over a period from Jan to April 2021, targeting different physicians in a number of public hospitals and private clinics in Tripoli. Data were collected using a pre-validated questionnaire and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results. Out of 135 distributed questionnaires, 122 were filled completely giving a response rate of 90.3%. About 36.3% of the respondents were males and 67.2% of them were within the age group of 30–40. The majority of physicians reported that the most common category of drug information was from the internet 78.7%, followed by medical representatives 60.6%, and medical journals 32.8%. The most effective reminder was a product sample (52.5%), leaflet (47.5%), a frequent visit (29.5%), a gift with a corporate logo (27.3%), medical representatives' acceptance of trustworthiness (16.4%), brochures (14.8%), and other approaches (23%). Furthermore, about 73.8 % of physicians were prescribing medications for their patients based on drug company. Conclusion. The outcomes of this study gave insight into prospective target areas for Libyan drug policymakers and regulatory agencies, and to develop a comprehensive guideline for MR interaction with health care professionals, as well as enforcement measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医务代表对的黎波里处方做法的影响
背景和目标。医学代表(MRs)在医学界推广医疗产品方面具有一定的影响力。医生选择开药的模式可能受到代表说服医生的程度的影响,最终影响医生的开药决定和药物选择。目前的研究旨在评估医疗代表对利比亚的黎波里卫生机构医生开处方做法的影响。方法。在2021年1月至4月期间,针对的黎波里多家公立医院和私人诊所的不同医生进行了一项横断面研究。使用预先验证的问卷收集数据,并使用描述性统计进行分析。结果。在发放的135份问卷中,完整填写了122份,回复率为90.3%。约36.3%的受访者为男性,67.2%的受访者年龄在30-40岁之间。大多数医生报告最常见的药品信息类别是来自互联网的78.7%,其次是医疗代表60.6%,医学期刊32.8%。最有效的提醒方式是产品样品(52.5%)、宣传单(47.5%)、频繁拜访(29.5%)、带有企业标志的礼品(27.3%)、医疗代表对可信赖性的认可(16.4%)、宣传手册(14.8%)和其他方式(23%)。此外,约73.8%的医生根据药品公司为患者开药。结论。这项研究的结果为利比亚药物决策者和监管机构提供了潜在目标领域的见解,并为MR与卫生保健专业人员的互动以及执法措施制定了全面的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insights into the role of fibroblasts in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines progression as a potential therapeutic target Docking Study of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase (HIV-1 RT) with Well-Known Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) Comparative Study of Chemical Profile and Antioxidant Activity of Two Eugenia species Cultivated in Egypt Hematological Alterations Occurring in Culinary Exposure of Wistar Rats to Some Indigenous Plants Phytochemical Profile and Analgesic Activity for Two Syzygium Species
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1