Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice of reporting of adverse drug reaction among family physicians in Surat city

K. Saxena, S. Srivastava
{"title":"Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice of reporting of adverse drug reaction among family physicians in Surat city","authors":"K. Saxena, S. Srivastava","doi":"10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20212379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Majority of the patients first contact the family physicians (FP) for treatment. If adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurs necessary measures are taken and ADR managed but usually not reported. The present study was conducted to assess knowledge, attitude and practice of reporting of ADR among family physicians.Methods: The study was a prospective cross-sectional questionnaire based study. The correctly filled forms from 90 family physicians were analysed based on 20 questions (knowledge 10, attitude 5, and practice 5).Results: Majority of family physicians were aware regarding the occurrence of ADR and 59% of them were aware that all ADR should be reported. Most of (71%) the physicians do not know there is ADR reporting form. Majority of them (93%) are aware that reporting of ADR is necessary that will increase patient safety (92%). About 78% of physician were aware that ADR can be reported by any of health care professional. However, about 71% do not know how to report and where to report ADR. Only few of them (19%) have reported ADR.Conclusions: The family physicians of Surat have adequate knowledge about pharmacovigilance and aware that ADR should be reported. However, most of them have not reported any ADR due to various reasons.","PeriodicalId":13901,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20212379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Majority of the patients first contact the family physicians (FP) for treatment. If adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurs necessary measures are taken and ADR managed but usually not reported. The present study was conducted to assess knowledge, attitude and practice of reporting of ADR among family physicians.Methods: The study was a prospective cross-sectional questionnaire based study. The correctly filled forms from 90 family physicians were analysed based on 20 questions (knowledge 10, attitude 5, and practice 5).Results: Majority of family physicians were aware regarding the occurrence of ADR and 59% of them were aware that all ADR should be reported. Most of (71%) the physicians do not know there is ADR reporting form. Majority of them (93%) are aware that reporting of ADR is necessary that will increase patient safety (92%). About 78% of physician were aware that ADR can be reported by any of health care professional. However, about 71% do not know how to report and where to report ADR. Only few of them (19%) have reported ADR.Conclusions: The family physicians of Surat have adequate knowledge about pharmacovigilance and aware that ADR should be reported. However, most of them have not reported any ADR due to various reasons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏拉特市家庭医生药物不良反应报告知识、态度及行为评价
背景:大多数患者首先向家庭医生寻求治疗。如果发生药物不良反应(ADR),则采取必要的措施并对ADR进行管理,但通常不报告。本研究旨在了解家庭医生对不良反应报告的知识、态度和实践情况。方法:采用前瞻性横断面问卷调查法。根据20个问题(知识10、态度5、行为5)对90名家庭医生正确填写的表格进行分析。结果:大多数家庭医生了解ADR的发生,59%的家庭医生了解所有ADR都应报告。大多数(71%)医生不知道有不良反应报告表。他们中的大多数(93%)意识到报告不良反应是必要的,这将提高患者的安全性(92%)。约78%的医生知道任何卫生保健专业人员都可以报告不良反应。然而,约71%的人不知道如何报告和在哪里报告不良反应。只有少数(19%)报告了不良反应。结论:苏拉特的家庭医生对药物警戒有足够的了解,并意识到应报告不良反应。然而,由于各种原因,大多数未报告任何不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current status of calcitonin gene-related peptide-based therapies in migraine: a scoping review Efficacy of current treatments against hepatitis C virus Adverse drug reactions to first line anti-tuberculosis drugs in newly diagnosed tuberculosis patients Comparing the effect of statins on hepatic fibrosis induced by carbon tetrachloride in Wistar rats Prescription audit of antihypertensive drugs used in stroke patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1