Comparison of the Effectiveness of Nursing Consultation and Guided Imagery-Based Training on Stress and Anxiety in Angiography Candidates: A Clinical Trial

Malihe Nikfarjam, M. Firouzkouhi, H. Shahdadi, Abdolghani Abdollahimohammad
{"title":"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Nursing Consultation and Guided Imagery-Based Training on Stress and Anxiety in Angiography Candidates: A Clinical Trial","authors":"Malihe Nikfarjam, M. Firouzkouhi, H. Shahdadi, Abdolghani Abdollahimohammad","doi":"10.5812/msnj.111967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite the use of various pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods for reducing stress among patients, one of the most important nursing challenges is how to control anxiety and stress in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of nursing consultation and guided imagery-based training on the level of stress and anxiety in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Methods: The participants in this clinical trial included 60 angiography candidates, admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU) of Ali-Ibn Abi-Taleb Hospital in Zahedan, southeast of Iran, in 2019. The participants were selected using convenience sampling and randomly assigned to three groups: nursing consultation, guided imagery, and control groups. The instruments used to collect the data included a demographic information form and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress scale (DASS-21). The questionnaires were completed by the participants in all three groups on the day of hospitalization and one hour before angiography. A guided imagery audio file was played one day before angiography for each participant in the nursing consultation group for a maximum of two hours. On the other hand, the guided imagery group, besides receiving routine care, listened to the same audio file for 30 - 45 minutes. However, the participants in the control group only received routine hospital training. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS version 25, using statistical tests, such as analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey’s post hoc test, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), paired samples t-test, Fisher’s exact test, and chi-square test at a significance level of less than 0.05 (P < 0.05). Results: After controlling for the significant effect of pretest scores, the results of ANCOVA test showed significant differences between the two intervention groups in terms of the mean scores of anxiety and stress after the intervention (P < 0.001). Also, the mean scores of anxiety and stress decreased in the guided imagery and nursing consultation groups as compared to the control group. However, the two interventions were not significantly different in reducing anxiety and stress among patients undergoing coronary angiography (P = 1). Conclusions: In this study, nursing consultation and guided imagery interventions led to a reduction in the stress and anxiety of patients undergoing angiography. Although the two interventions showed no significant difference in terms of effectiveness, they had positive effects on the mental health of angiography candidates. Therefore, these techniques can be employed by nurses, depending on their ease of use and conditions, to reduce stress and anxiety among angiography candidates.","PeriodicalId":18480,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/msnj.111967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Despite the use of various pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods for reducing stress among patients, one of the most important nursing challenges is how to control anxiety and stress in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of nursing consultation and guided imagery-based training on the level of stress and anxiety in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Methods: The participants in this clinical trial included 60 angiography candidates, admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU) of Ali-Ibn Abi-Taleb Hospital in Zahedan, southeast of Iran, in 2019. The participants were selected using convenience sampling and randomly assigned to three groups: nursing consultation, guided imagery, and control groups. The instruments used to collect the data included a demographic information form and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress scale (DASS-21). The questionnaires were completed by the participants in all three groups on the day of hospitalization and one hour before angiography. A guided imagery audio file was played one day before angiography for each participant in the nursing consultation group for a maximum of two hours. On the other hand, the guided imagery group, besides receiving routine care, listened to the same audio file for 30 - 45 minutes. However, the participants in the control group only received routine hospital training. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS version 25, using statistical tests, such as analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey’s post hoc test, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), paired samples t-test, Fisher’s exact test, and chi-square test at a significance level of less than 0.05 (P < 0.05). Results: After controlling for the significant effect of pretest scores, the results of ANCOVA test showed significant differences between the two intervention groups in terms of the mean scores of anxiety and stress after the intervention (P < 0.001). Also, the mean scores of anxiety and stress decreased in the guided imagery and nursing consultation groups as compared to the control group. However, the two interventions were not significantly different in reducing anxiety and stress among patients undergoing coronary angiography (P = 1). Conclusions: In this study, nursing consultation and guided imagery interventions led to a reduction in the stress and anxiety of patients undergoing angiography. Although the two interventions showed no significant difference in terms of effectiveness, they had positive effects on the mental health of angiography candidates. Therefore, these techniques can be employed by nurses, depending on their ease of use and conditions, to reduce stress and anxiety among angiography candidates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理咨询与引导影像训练对血管造影候选人压力和焦虑的效果比较:一项临床试验
背景:尽管使用了各种药物和非药物方法来减轻患者的压力,但如何控制冠状动脉造影患者的焦虑和压力是最重要的护理挑战之一。目的:本研究旨在比较护理咨询和基于图像的引导训练对冠状动脉造影患者压力和焦虑水平的影响。方法:本临床试验的参与者包括2019年在伊朗东南部扎黑丹Ali-Ibn Abi-Taleb医院冠状动脉监护室(CCU)住院的60名血管造影候选人。采用方便抽样法,随机分为三组:护理咨询组、引导意象组和对照组。用于收集数据的工具包括人口统计信息表和抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21)。三组受试者于住院当天及造影前一小时完成问卷调查。在血管造影前一天,为护理咨询组的每位参与者播放引导图像音频文件,最长播放两小时。另一方面,引导意象组在接受常规护理的同时,听同样的音频文件30 - 45分钟。然而,对照组的参与者只接受常规的医院培训。收集的资料在SPSS 25版中进行分析,采用方差分析(ANOVA)、Tukey事后检验、协方差分析(ANCOVA)、配对样本t检验、Fisher确切检验、卡方检验等统计检验,显著性水平小于0.05 (P < 0.05)。结果:在控制了前测分数的显著影响后,ANCOVA检验结果显示,两组干预后焦虑和压力均分差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。此外,与对照组相比,指导意象组和护理咨询组的焦虑和压力平均得分有所下降。然而,两种干预措施在减轻冠状动脉造影患者焦虑和压力方面没有显著差异(P = 1)。结论:本研究中,护理咨询和引导成像干预措施可减轻冠状动脉造影患者的压力和焦虑。虽然两种干预措施在有效性方面没有显着差异,但它们对血管造影候选人的心理健康有积极影响。因此,这些技术可以由护士使用,取决于他们的易用性和条件,以减少压力和焦虑的血管造影术候选人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of ACT and DBT-Based Interventions with and without Exercise on Pain Outcomes and Desire for Treatment in Substance-Dependent Patients with Chronic Pain Effect of Self-efficacy-Based Training on Treatment Adherence of Patients with Heart Failure The Effect of an Exercise Program on the Quality of Life in Burn Patients Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Hybrid Concept Analysis Effect of Mobile Health Self-Care Training on Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1