Quantifying the Inefficiency of Multi-unit Auctions for Normal Goods

Brian Baisa, Simon Essig Aberg
{"title":"Quantifying the Inefficiency of Multi-unit Auctions for Normal Goods","authors":"Brian Baisa, Simon Essig Aberg","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3912928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study multi-unit auctions for homogenous goods in a private value setting where bidders have non-quasilinear preferences. Several recent impossibility results study this setting and find there is no mechanism that retains the Vickrey auction’s desired incentive and efficiency properties without quasilinearity. While a fully efficient mechanism is impossible, we show that any undominated outcome of the Vickrey auction has a negligible inefficiency when bidder wealth effects are sufficiently small. In order to show this, we first place bounds on undominated bid behavior in the Vickrey auction when bidders have non-quasilinear preferences. We use (Marshallian) deadweight loss as our inefficiency metric, and we derive a tight upper bound on the inefficiency associated with the Vickrey auction in terms of the degree of bidder wealth effects. As wealth effects diminish, the bound continuously approaches zero. Other common multi-unit auction formats do not have this property, and their worst-case inefficiencies are higher than that of the Vickrey auction.","PeriodicalId":18516,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Production","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3912928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study multi-unit auctions for homogenous goods in a private value setting where bidders have non-quasilinear preferences. Several recent impossibility results study this setting and find there is no mechanism that retains the Vickrey auction’s desired incentive and efficiency properties without quasilinearity. While a fully efficient mechanism is impossible, we show that any undominated outcome of the Vickrey auction has a negligible inefficiency when bidder wealth effects are sufficiently small. In order to show this, we first place bounds on undominated bid behavior in the Vickrey auction when bidders have non-quasilinear preferences. We use (Marshallian) deadweight loss as our inefficiency metric, and we derive a tight upper bound on the inefficiency associated with the Vickrey auction in terms of the degree of bidder wealth effects. As wealth effects diminish, the bound continuously approaches zero. Other common multi-unit auction formats do not have this property, and their worst-case inefficiencies are higher than that of the Vickrey auction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普通物品多单位拍卖的低效率量化
我们研究了在私人价值设置下同质商品的多单位拍卖,其中竞标者具有非拟线性偏好。最近的几个不可能结果研究了这种情况,发现没有准线性的机制可以保持维克里拍卖的预期激励和效率特性。虽然完全有效的机制是不可能的,但我们表明,当投标人的财富效应足够小时,维克里拍卖的任何非决定结果的低效率都可以忽略不计。为了证明这一点,我们首先在投标人具有非拟线性偏好的Vickrey拍卖中设置了非支配出价行为的界限。我们使用(Marshallian)无谓损失作为我们的无效率指标,并根据投标人财富效应的程度,得出与Vickrey拍卖相关的无效率的严格上限。随着财富效应的减弱,边界不断趋近于零。其他常见的多单元拍卖形式不具备这一特性,其最坏情况下的低效率高于Vickrey拍卖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pricing the Pharmaceuticals When the Ability to Pay Differs: Taking Vertical Equity Seriously Dual Role Platforms and Search Order Distortion Monopoly, Product Quality and Information Disclosure Production Approach Markup Estimators Often Measure Input Wedges Successful, but not Too Much: Managing Platform Complementors in the Presence of Network Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1