Prognostic Factors for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Traumatic Mass Lesions: A Prospective Experience from a Developing Country

Naseeruddin Ghulam, K. Sultan, Mohammad Ashraf, N. Choudhary, U. Kamboh, Nazir Ahmad, M. Raza, Waqa Latif, Syed Shahzad Hussain, Naveed Ashraf
{"title":"Prognostic Factors for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Traumatic Mass Lesions: A Prospective Experience from a Developing Country","authors":"Naseeruddin Ghulam, K. Sultan, Mohammad Ashraf, N. Choudhary, U. Kamboh, Nazir Ahmad, M. Raza, Waqa Latif, Syed Shahzad Hussain, Naveed Ashraf","doi":"10.36552/pjns.v25i4.606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:  To evaluate the prognostic factors affecting functional clinical outcomes in severe traumatic brain injury patients with traumatic mass lesions undergoing decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC). \nMaterials and Methods:  A prospective cohort of 85 patients of severe traumatic brain injury patients with traumatic mass lesions underwent a unilateral decompressive hemicraniectomy. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Score at 28 days, 3 months, and 6 months. Bivariate analysis (chi-squared) was used to identify parameters that resulted in poor outcomes and multiple regression was used to identify independent factors predicting poor outcomes. \nResults:  85 patients were recruited. Functional outcomes were dichotomised as favourable (Glasgow Outcome Score of 4 – 5) and poor (Glasgow Outcome Score 1-3) and evaluated at 28 days, 3 and 6 months. A total of 59 patients expired (69.4%). Bivariate analysis revealed GCS 3 – 5 at presentation (P = 0.002), midline shift greater than 7.5mm (P < 0.001), the volume of the mass lesion more than 40ml (P = 0.006) resulted in a poor outcome. Age dichotomised to less than or more than 50 years bordered statistical significance (P = 0.063). Only GCS at presentation and midline shift were independent factors that predicted poor outcomes when controlling for covariates.  \nConclusion:  Decompressive hemicraniectomy can be a lifesaving intervention in managing severe traumatic brain injury patients with traumatic mass lesions. However, its use needs to be employed judiciously. ","PeriodicalId":19963,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v25i4.606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  To evaluate the prognostic factors affecting functional clinical outcomes in severe traumatic brain injury patients with traumatic mass lesions undergoing decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC). Materials and Methods:  A prospective cohort of 85 patients of severe traumatic brain injury patients with traumatic mass lesions underwent a unilateral decompressive hemicraniectomy. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Score at 28 days, 3 months, and 6 months. Bivariate analysis (chi-squared) was used to identify parameters that resulted in poor outcomes and multiple regression was used to identify independent factors predicting poor outcomes. Results:  85 patients were recruited. Functional outcomes were dichotomised as favourable (Glasgow Outcome Score of 4 – 5) and poor (Glasgow Outcome Score 1-3) and evaluated at 28 days, 3 and 6 months. A total of 59 patients expired (69.4%). Bivariate analysis revealed GCS 3 – 5 at presentation (P = 0.002), midline shift greater than 7.5mm (P < 0.001), the volume of the mass lesion more than 40ml (P = 0.006) resulted in a poor outcome. Age dichotomised to less than or more than 50 years bordered statistical significance (P = 0.063). Only GCS at presentation and midline shift were independent factors that predicted poor outcomes when controlling for covariates.  Conclusion:  Decompressive hemicraniectomy can be a lifesaving intervention in managing severe traumatic brain injury patients with traumatic mass lesions. However, its use needs to be employed judiciously. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:探讨影响重型颅脑损伤合并创伤性肿块行半骨减压切除术(DHC)患者功能临床预后的因素。材料与方法:85例伴有外伤性肿块的重型颅脑损伤患者行单侧减压半骨切除术。在28天、3个月和6个月时使用格拉斯哥预后评分评估功能结局。双变量分析(卡方)用于识别导致不良结果的参数,多元回归用于识别预测不良结果的独立因素。结果:共纳入85例患者。功能结果分为良好(格拉斯哥预后评分4 - 5)和差(格拉斯哥预后评分1-3),并在28天、3个月和6个月时进行评估。死亡59例(69.4%)。双因素分析显示,首发时GCS为3 ~ 5 (P = 0.002),中线移位大于7.5mm (P < 0.001),肿块体积大于40ml (P = 0.006),预后较差。年龄分为小于或大于50岁,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.063)。在控制协变量时,只有出现时的GCS和中线移位是预测不良预后的独立因素。结论:在重型颅脑损伤合并创伤性肿块的患者中,半骨减压切除术是一种挽救生命的干预措施。然而,它的使用需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computational biomarkers for the decision of neurosurgical treatment for brain tumors Outcomes of Management of Pituitary Adenoma by Use of Octreotide Injections Preoperatively Metallic Foreign Body in the Neck – a Rare Incidence Comparison of the Efficacy of Fusion with Non-Fusion Treatment for Recurrent Lumber Disc Herniation (RLDH) Impact of Intracranial Pressure-Monitored Therapy on Mortality in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1