How much anonymity does network latency leak?

Nicholas Hopper, Eugene Y. Vasserman, Eric Chan-Tin
{"title":"How much anonymity does network latency leak?","authors":"Nicholas Hopper, Eugene Y. Vasserman, Eric Chan-Tin","doi":"10.1145/1315245.1315257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low-latency anonymity systems such as Tor, AN.ON, Crowds, and Anonymizer.com aim to provide anonymous connections that are both untraceable by \"local\" adversaries who control only a few machines, and have low enough delay to support anonymous use of network services like web browsing and remote login. One consequence of these goals is that these services leak some information about the network latency between the sender and one or more nodes in the system. This paper reports on three experiments that partially measure the extent to which such leakage can compromise anonymity. First, using a public dataset of pairwise round-trip times (RTTs) between 2000 Internet hosts, we estimate that on average, knowing the network location of host A and the RTT to host B leaks 3.64 bits of information about the network location of B. Second, we describe an attack that allows a pair of colluding web sites to predict, based on local timing information and with no additional resources, whether two connections from the same Tor exit node are using the same circuit with 17% equal error rate. Finally, we describe an attack that allows a malicious website, with access to a network coordinate system and one corrupted Tor router, to recover roughly 6.8 bits of network location per hour.","PeriodicalId":50912,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Information and System Security","volume":"176 4 1","pages":"13:1-13:28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"94","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Information and System Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1315245.1315257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 94

Abstract

Low-latency anonymity systems such as Tor, AN.ON, Crowds, and Anonymizer.com aim to provide anonymous connections that are both untraceable by "local" adversaries who control only a few machines, and have low enough delay to support anonymous use of network services like web browsing and remote login. One consequence of these goals is that these services leak some information about the network latency between the sender and one or more nodes in the system. This paper reports on three experiments that partially measure the extent to which such leakage can compromise anonymity. First, using a public dataset of pairwise round-trip times (RTTs) between 2000 Internet hosts, we estimate that on average, knowing the network location of host A and the RTT to host B leaks 3.64 bits of information about the network location of B. Second, we describe an attack that allows a pair of colluding web sites to predict, based on local timing information and with no additional resources, whether two connections from the same Tor exit node are using the same circuit with 17% equal error rate. Finally, we describe an attack that allows a malicious website, with access to a network coordinate system and one corrupted Tor router, to recover roughly 6.8 bits of network location per hour.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络延迟泄漏了多少匿名性?
低延迟匿名系统,如Tor, AN。ON、crowd和Anonymizer.com旨在提供匿名连接,这些连接既无法被只控制几台机器的“本地”对手追踪,又具有足够低的延迟,以支持匿名使用网络服务,如网页浏览和远程登录。这些目标的一个后果是,这些服务会泄漏有关发送方与系统中一个或多个节点之间的网络延迟的一些信息。本文报告了三个实验,这些实验部分地测量了这种泄漏可能损害匿名性的程度。首先,使用2000台互联网主机之间的双向往返时间(RTT)的公共数据集,我们估计,平均而言,知道主机a的网络位置和主机B的RTT泄露了关于B的网络位置的3.64位信息。其次,我们描述了一种攻击,允许一对串通的网站根据本地时间信息和没有额外资源来预测,来自同一Tor出口节点的两个连接是否使用相同的电路,错误率为17%。最后,我们描述了一种攻击,允许恶意网站访问网络坐标系统和一个损坏的Tor路由器,每小时恢复大约6.8位的网络位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: ISSEC is a scholarly, scientific journal that publishes original research papers in all areas of information and system security, including technologies, systems, applications, and policies.
期刊最新文献
An Efficient User Verification System Using Angle-Based Mouse Movement Biometrics A New Framework for Privacy-Preserving Aggregation of Time-Series Data Behavioral Study of Users When Interacting with Active Honeytokens Model Checking Distributed Mandatory Access Control Policies Randomization-Based Intrusion Detection System for Advanced Metering Infrastructure*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1