People Parks Win-Win Framework: Integrating components that can influence people-park relationships

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Koedoe Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI:10.4102/koedoe.v64i1.1723
D. Queiros
{"title":"People Parks Win-Win Framework: Integrating components that can influence people-park relationships","authors":"D. Queiros","doi":"10.4102/koedoe.v64i1.1723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protected areas are often surrounded by impoverished communities. Biodiversity must be conserved while improving community well-being. Greater insight is required into what influences pro-conservation attitudes and behaviour in these communities. Much appears to rest on the relationships between protected area staff and local communities surrounding the parks, yet there is limited understanding of stakeholders’ perceptions and how to pragmatically achieve win-win solutions. With the current lack of a multidimensional framework to enhance understanding of this complex and dynamic relationships, this research aimed to construct a comprehensive integrated framework representing the components that can influence people-park relationships. The framework was constructed via a threefold approach, namely a broader literature review, a focused study of existing schemata and primary research regarding the attitudes and behaviour of three local communities bordering three different protected areas in South Africa. The resultant People Parks Win-Win Framework consists of four layers (each with its own components): ‘External context’, ‘Stakeholders’, ‘Community beneficiation’ and ‘Outputs’. Its unique arrangement focuses on beneficiation, inclusion of more stakeholders and their characteristics, the centrality of relationships and demonstration of outputs (how preceding layers can culminate in win-wins and how pro-conservation attitudes and behaviour fit into this). A simplified framework is also provided, for stakeholders to superimpose their own characteristics, benefits, influences and beneficiation principles. This research draws on the work of others as well as primary research to produce this multidimensional framework capturing the influences on people-park relationships with a focus on achieving both community well-being and biodiversity conservation.Conservation implications: Win-wins for community well-being and biodiversity conservation are complex. Yet potential exists for tangible and intangible beneficiation, which can foster positive attitudes resulting in pro-conservation behaviour and robust reciprocate relationships between parks and neighbouring communities. To this end, the framework serves as a practical tool for protected area managers and stakeholders involved in the people-park relationships, which can be customised to particular contexts.","PeriodicalId":48892,"journal":{"name":"Koedoe","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koedoe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v64i1.1723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Protected areas are often surrounded by impoverished communities. Biodiversity must be conserved while improving community well-being. Greater insight is required into what influences pro-conservation attitudes and behaviour in these communities. Much appears to rest on the relationships between protected area staff and local communities surrounding the parks, yet there is limited understanding of stakeholders’ perceptions and how to pragmatically achieve win-win solutions. With the current lack of a multidimensional framework to enhance understanding of this complex and dynamic relationships, this research aimed to construct a comprehensive integrated framework representing the components that can influence people-park relationships. The framework was constructed via a threefold approach, namely a broader literature review, a focused study of existing schemata and primary research regarding the attitudes and behaviour of three local communities bordering three different protected areas in South Africa. The resultant People Parks Win-Win Framework consists of four layers (each with its own components): ‘External context’, ‘Stakeholders’, ‘Community beneficiation’ and ‘Outputs’. Its unique arrangement focuses on beneficiation, inclusion of more stakeholders and their characteristics, the centrality of relationships and demonstration of outputs (how preceding layers can culminate in win-wins and how pro-conservation attitudes and behaviour fit into this). A simplified framework is also provided, for stakeholders to superimpose their own characteristics, benefits, influences and beneficiation principles. This research draws on the work of others as well as primary research to produce this multidimensional framework capturing the influences on people-park relationships with a focus on achieving both community well-being and biodiversity conservation.Conservation implications: Win-wins for community well-being and biodiversity conservation are complex. Yet potential exists for tangible and intangible beneficiation, which can foster positive attitudes resulting in pro-conservation behaviour and robust reciprocate relationships between parks and neighbouring communities. To this end, the framework serves as a practical tool for protected area managers and stakeholders involved in the people-park relationships, which can be customised to particular contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人园双赢框架:整合影响人园关系的要素
保护区周围往往是贫困社区。必须在改善社区福祉的同时保护生物多样性。需要更深入地了解是什么影响了这些社区中支持保护的态度和行为。很多事情似乎取决于保护区工作人员和公园周围当地社区之间的关系,但对利益相关者的看法以及如何务实地实现双赢解决方案的理解有限。由于目前缺乏一个多维框架来加强对这种复杂和动态关系的理解,本研究旨在构建一个综合的集成框架,代表可以影响人与公园关系的组成部分。该框架是通过三方面的方法构建的,即更广泛的文献综述,对现有模式的重点研究,以及对南非三个不同保护区附近三个当地社区的态度和行为的初步研究。由此产生的人民公园双赢框架由四个层面组成(每个层面都有自己的组成部分):“外部环境”、“利益相关者”、“社区受益”和“产出”。其独特的安排侧重于受益,包括更多利益相关者及其特征,关系的中心性和产出的展示(前几层如何达到双赢,以及支持保护的态度和行为如何适应这一点)。为利益相关者提供了一个简化的框架,以便他们将自己的特点、利益、影响和受益原则叠加在一起。这项研究借鉴了其他人的工作以及初步研究,以建立这个多维框架,捕捉对人与公园关系的影响,重点是实现社区福祉和生物多样性保护。保护意义:社区福祉和生物多样性保护的双赢是复杂的。然而,存在有形和无形收益的潜力,这可以培养积极的态度,从而促进保护行为和公园与邻近社区之间强有力的互惠关系。为此,该框架为保护区管理者和参与人与公园关系的利益相关者提供了一个实用工具,可以根据特定情况进行定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Koedoe
Koedoe BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Koedoe, with the subtitle ''African Protected Area Conservation and Science'', promotes and contributes to the scientific (biological) and environmental (ecological and biodiversity) conservation practices of Africa by defining the key disciplines that will ensure the existence of a wide variety of plant and animal species in their natural environments (biological diversity) in Africa.
期刊最新文献
Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of a wildlife and cattle savanna ranch in South-Western Zimbabwe Waterbird community changes in the Wilderness Lakes, South Africa (Part 1 of 3): Herbivores and omnivores Waterbird community changes in the Wilderness Lakes, South Africa (Part 2 of 3): Shorebirds Waterbird community changes in the Wilderness Lakes, South Africa (Part 3 of 3): Diving piscivores and scavengers Erratum: The influence of fire presence and absence on grass species composition and species richness at Mountain Zebra National Park
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1