High incidence of discrepancies in new Siemens assay – a comparison of cardiac troponin I assays

R. Hasselbalch, J. Kristensen, N. Jørgensen, Nina Strandkjær, B. Alaour, S. Afzal, M. Marber, H. Bundgaard, K. Iversen
{"title":"High incidence of discrepancies in new Siemens assay – a comparison of cardiac troponin I assays","authors":"R. Hasselbalch, J. Kristensen, N. Jørgensen, Nina Strandkjær, B. Alaour, S. Afzal, M. Marber, H. Bundgaard, K. Iversen","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2022-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Cardiac troponin (cTn) is the biochemical gold standard for diagnosing myocardial infarction (MI). We compared the Siemens ADVIA Centaur High-Sensitivity (hs-cTnI) assay with the Siemens Ultra assay (cTnI-U). Methods Over 3 months cTnI-U and hs-cTnI were measured simultaneously at Herlev-Gentofte Hospital. Acute myocardial injury was diagnosed using the 4th universal definition. Disputed cases were adjudicated using clinical data. We compared diagnostic accuracy using area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic. Outliers in between-assay differences were defined as a factor-5 difference and ≥1 measurement >40 ng/L. Patients with outlier differences were invited for re-sampling and tested with serial dilution and heterophilic blocking tubes. Results From the 18th January to the 20th April 2019, 4,369 samples on 2,658 patients were included. cTnI-U measured higher concentrations than hs-cTnI (mean 23%, −52–213%), resulting in a higher frequency of acute myocardial injury, 255 (9.6%) vs. 203 (7.6%), p<0.001. This remained significant after adjudication, 212 vs 197, p<0.001. AUC for the prediction of MI for was 0.963 for cTnI-U and 0.959 for hs-cTnI, p=0.001. Outlier differences were seen in 35 (1.2%) patients, primarily with elevated hs-cTnI (n=33, 94%). On two re-samplings (median 144 and 297 days since inclusion), 16 of 20 (80%) and 11 of 11 had sustained elevation of hs-cTnI. The samples showed no signs of heterophilic antibodies. Conclusions Using hs-cTnI resulted in a subset of patients with large, discrepant elevations in concentration. These patients still had elevated hs-cTnI 6–10 months post admission but no heterophilic antibodies.","PeriodicalId":10388,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Cardiac troponin (cTn) is the biochemical gold standard for diagnosing myocardial infarction (MI). We compared the Siemens ADVIA Centaur High-Sensitivity (hs-cTnI) assay with the Siemens Ultra assay (cTnI-U). Methods Over 3 months cTnI-U and hs-cTnI were measured simultaneously at Herlev-Gentofte Hospital. Acute myocardial injury was diagnosed using the 4th universal definition. Disputed cases were adjudicated using clinical data. We compared diagnostic accuracy using area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic. Outliers in between-assay differences were defined as a factor-5 difference and ≥1 measurement >40 ng/L. Patients with outlier differences were invited for re-sampling and tested with serial dilution and heterophilic blocking tubes. Results From the 18th January to the 20th April 2019, 4,369 samples on 2,658 patients were included. cTnI-U measured higher concentrations than hs-cTnI (mean 23%, −52–213%), resulting in a higher frequency of acute myocardial injury, 255 (9.6%) vs. 203 (7.6%), p<0.001. This remained significant after adjudication, 212 vs 197, p<0.001. AUC for the prediction of MI for was 0.963 for cTnI-U and 0.959 for hs-cTnI, p=0.001. Outlier differences were seen in 35 (1.2%) patients, primarily with elevated hs-cTnI (n=33, 94%). On two re-samplings (median 144 and 297 days since inclusion), 16 of 20 (80%) and 11 of 11 had sustained elevation of hs-cTnI. The samples showed no signs of heterophilic antibodies. Conclusions Using hs-cTnI resulted in a subset of patients with large, discrepant elevations in concentration. These patients still had elevated hs-cTnI 6–10 months post admission but no heterophilic antibodies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高发生率的差异在新的西门子测定-心脏肌钙蛋白I测定的比较
目的心肌肌钙蛋白(cTn)是诊断心肌梗死(MI)的生化金标准。我们比较了Siemens ADVIA Centaur High-Sensitivity (hs-cTnI) assay和Siemens Ultra assay (cTnI-U)。方法在Herlev-Gentofte医院同时测定3个月以上cTnI-U和hs-cTnI。急性心肌损伤诊断采用第四种通用定义。有争议的案件是根据临床数据裁决的。我们使用受试者工作特征的曲线下面积(AUC)来比较诊断的准确性。测定间差异的异常值定义为因子5差异和≥1测量>40 ng/L。有异常差异的患者被邀请重新取样,并使用系列稀释和嗜异性阻断管进行测试。结果2019年1月18日至4月20日,共纳入2658例患者的4369份样本。cTnI-U的浓度高于hs-cTnI(平均23%,- 52-213%),导致急性心肌损伤的频率更高,255(9.6%)比203 (7.6%),p<0.001。这在判决后仍然显著,212比197,p<0.001。cTnI-U和hs-cTnI预测MI的AUC分别为0.963和0.959,p=0.001。35例(1.2%)患者出现异常差异,主要是hs-cTnI升高(n=33, 94%)。在两次重新采样(纳入后的中位144天和297天)中,20人中有16人(80%)和11人中有11人的hs-cTnI持续升高。样本没有显示出嗜异性抗体的迹象。结论:使用hs-cTnI会导致一部分患者出现浓度差异较大的升高。这些患者在入院后6-10个月仍有升高的hs-cTnI,但没有嗜异性抗体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Screening for sickle cell disease: focus on newborn investigations An automatic analysis and quality assurance method for lymphocyte subset identification Discriminating signal from noise: the biological variation of circulating calprotectin in serum and plasma Traumatic brain injury 43rd annual conference of the association of clinical biochemists in Ireland (ACBI 2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1