Power use, cooperative behavior and alliance performance: evidence from contract farming supply chains in China

Shaoling Fu, Guangyao He, Qianwen Wang, Baofeng Huo, Yalan Ding
{"title":"Power use, cooperative behavior and alliance performance: evidence from contract farming supply chains in China","authors":"Shaoling Fu, Guangyao He, Qianwen Wang, Baofeng Huo, Yalan Ding","doi":"10.1108/imds-11-2021-0661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to explore the relationship among five types of power (expert, referent, legitimate, reward and coercive power), two dimensions of cooperative behavior (specific investments and communication) and three types of alliance performance (alliance stability, income increase and cost decrease) in contract farming. By investigating the dyadic perspectives of companies and contract farmers, the authors examine how power use influences cooperative behavior, which further enhances alliance performance.Design/methodology/approachThe authors construct a theoretical model grounded on resource dependence theory (RDT). Data from 202 companies and 462 farmers in China are used to test the proposed hypotheses using structural equation modeling.FindingsThe authors' results show that the five types of power play different roles in cooperative behavior. On the one hand, farmers' expert, reward and coercive power enhance the company's specific investments; farmers' expert power enhances the company's communication but farmers' coercive power harms the company's communication. Also the company's specific investments enhance communication that is positively related to alliance ability, income increase and cost decrease. On the other hand, the company's expert, referent and legitimate power enhance farmers' communication, while the company's coercive power harms farmers' communication; the company's reward and coercive power enhance farmers' specific investments. Moreover, farmers' communication is positively related to alliance ability, income increase and cost decrease, but farmers' specific investments do not significantly influence such.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature on contract farming supply chain management by examining the relationships among power use, cooperative behavior and alliance performance from the dyadic perspective of companies and farmers. These findings have practical implications for agricultural companies and farmers promoting cooperative behavior and alliance performance through appropriate power use in contract farming supply chains.","PeriodicalId":13427,"journal":{"name":"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.","volume":"34 1","pages":"794-820"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-11-2021-0661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to explore the relationship among five types of power (expert, referent, legitimate, reward and coercive power), two dimensions of cooperative behavior (specific investments and communication) and three types of alliance performance (alliance stability, income increase and cost decrease) in contract farming. By investigating the dyadic perspectives of companies and contract farmers, the authors examine how power use influences cooperative behavior, which further enhances alliance performance.Design/methodology/approachThe authors construct a theoretical model grounded on resource dependence theory (RDT). Data from 202 companies and 462 farmers in China are used to test the proposed hypotheses using structural equation modeling.FindingsThe authors' results show that the five types of power play different roles in cooperative behavior. On the one hand, farmers' expert, reward and coercive power enhance the company's specific investments; farmers' expert power enhances the company's communication but farmers' coercive power harms the company's communication. Also the company's specific investments enhance communication that is positively related to alliance ability, income increase and cost decrease. On the other hand, the company's expert, referent and legitimate power enhance farmers' communication, while the company's coercive power harms farmers' communication; the company's reward and coercive power enhance farmers' specific investments. Moreover, farmers' communication is positively related to alliance ability, income increase and cost decrease, but farmers' specific investments do not significantly influence such.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature on contract farming supply chain management by examining the relationships among power use, cooperative behavior and alliance performance from the dyadic perspective of companies and farmers. These findings have practical implications for agricultural companies and farmers promoting cooperative behavior and alliance performance through appropriate power use in contract farming supply chains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力使用、合作行为与联盟绩效:来自中国承包农业供应链的证据
本研究旨在探讨承包农业中五种权力(专家权力、参考权力、合法权力、奖励权力和强制权力)、合作行为的两个维度(特定投资和沟通)和三种联盟绩效(联盟稳定性、收入增加和成本降低)之间的关系。通过对企业和契约农民二元视角的考察,研究了权力使用如何影响合作行为,进而提高联盟绩效。基于资源依赖理论(resource dependence theory, RDT),作者构建了一个理论模型。本文采用结构方程模型对中国202家公司和462名农民的数据进行了检验。研究结果表明,五种类型的权力在合作行为中发挥着不同的作用。一方面,农民的专业性、报酬性和强制力增强了企业的专用性投资;农民的专家权力促进了公司的沟通,而农民的强制权力损害了公司的沟通。公司的专项投资增强了沟通,与联盟能力、收入的增加和成本的降低正相关。另一方面,公司的专家权力、参考权力和合法权力促进了农民的沟通,而公司的强制力损害了农民的沟通;公司的奖励和强制力增强了农民的专用性投资。此外,农民沟通与联盟能力、收入增加和成本降低呈正相关,但农民专项投入对联盟能力的影响不显著。原创性/价值本研究从企业和农户的二元视角考察了权力使用、合作行为和联盟绩效之间的关系,为契约农业供应链管理的研究贡献了文献。这些发现对农业公司和农民通过在合同农业供应链中适当使用权力来促进合作行为和联盟绩效具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Big data analytics capability in building supply chain resilience: the moderating effect of innovation-focused complementary assets Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on customer behavior in live streaming: evidence from an eye-tracking experiment How doctor image features engage health science short video viewers? Investigating the age and gender bias The impact of enterprise social media usage on employee creativity: a self-regulation perspective Implementation of information and communication technologies in fruit and vegetable supply chain: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1