Community resilience to natural disasters: A systemic review of contemporary methods and theories

Md Ohidur Zaman , Mohammad Mojammel Hussain Raihan
{"title":"Community resilience to natural disasters: A systemic review of contemporary methods and theories","authors":"Md Ohidur Zaman ,&nbsp;Mohammad Mojammel Hussain Raihan","doi":"10.1016/j.nhres.2023.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Due to global climate change, community resilience to natural disasters has become a high priority in environmental research. Academicians and practitioners from different disciplines and organizations include several dimensions to outline the process of building resilient communities. Although this research branch suffers from the lack of a shared theoretical and methodological consensus, many scholars publish research articles each year. Similarly, social scientists include diverse contextual humanitarian dimensions that are challenging to trace. Therefore, this study attempts to undertake a systematic review of the literature of the last 12 years (2010–2021) to outline the current trends in research methods, selected dimensions, and theoretical standpoints from the social perspective. This systematic observation of the literature identifies the recent trends in adopting research design, sampling design, and data collection techniques used for the research. The present review also traces the propensity of including major theoretical dimensions in the research. After identifying the contemporary trends in research, we find that a comprehensive multi-phase research model is necessary to initiate an effective policymaking in a specific socio-ecological context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100943,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards Research","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 583-594"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666592123000501/pdfft?md5=0f1b63c8b393fc838320d9901e87e04d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666592123000501-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666592123000501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to global climate change, community resilience to natural disasters has become a high priority in environmental research. Academicians and practitioners from different disciplines and organizations include several dimensions to outline the process of building resilient communities. Although this research branch suffers from the lack of a shared theoretical and methodological consensus, many scholars publish research articles each year. Similarly, social scientists include diverse contextual humanitarian dimensions that are challenging to trace. Therefore, this study attempts to undertake a systematic review of the literature of the last 12 years (2010–2021) to outline the current trends in research methods, selected dimensions, and theoretical standpoints from the social perspective. This systematic observation of the literature identifies the recent trends in adopting research design, sampling design, and data collection techniques used for the research. The present review also traces the propensity of including major theoretical dimensions in the research. After identifying the contemporary trends in research, we find that a comprehensive multi-phase research model is necessary to initiate an effective policymaking in a specific socio-ecological context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区对自然灾害的复原力:对当代方法和理论的系统回顾
由于全球气候变化,社区对自然灾害的适应能力已成为环境研究的重点。来自不同学科和组织的学者和实践者包括几个维度来概述建设弹性社区的过程。尽管这一研究分支缺乏共同的理论和方法共识,但每年都有许多学者发表研究文章。同样,社会科学家也包括了各种各样的情境人道主义维度,这些维度很难追踪。因此,本研究试图对过去12年(2010-2021)的文献进行系统回顾,从社会角度概述当前研究方法、选择维度和理论立场的趋势。这种对文献的系统观察确定了采用研究设计、抽样设计和用于研究的数据收集技术的最新趋势。本综述还追溯了在研究中纳入主要理论维度的倾向。在确定了当前研究趋势后,我们发现,在特定的社会生态背景下,需要一个综合的多阶段研究模型来启动有效的政策制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A review on the extreme rainfall studies in India Socioeconomic impacts of flooding and its coping strategies in Nigeria: Evidence from Dagiri community, Gwagwalada area council of Abuja Ecosysem-based approach to local flood risk management in Ogun State, Nigeria: Knowledge, and pathway to Actualisation Comprehensive seismic hazard assessment for Guwahati City, Northeast India: Insights from probabilistic and deterministic seismic hazard analysis Source characteristics of earthquakes in Delhi and its vicinity: Implications for seismogenesis in the stable continental region of India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1