Venous Thromboembolism in Severe Burns Patients with Intravascular Warming Catheter: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE European burn journal Pub Date : 2023-02-12 DOI:10.3390/ebj4010008
Isabella Reid, Hadley Bortz, Aidan Burrell, Dashiell Gantner, Samara Rosenblum, Heather Cleland
{"title":"Venous Thromboembolism in Severe Burns Patients with Intravascular Warming Catheter: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Isabella Reid, Hadley Bortz, Aidan Burrell, Dashiell Gantner, Samara Rosenblum, Heather Cleland","doi":"10.3390/ebj4010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Use of intravascular warming catheters following major burns has been shown to be effective to maintain normothermia, but their use may be associated with complications. The aim of this study was to determine what proportion of patients with an intravascular warming catheter developed a potentially catheter-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) and to identify contributing risk factors. <i>Methods:</i> This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the Victorian Adult Burns Service January 2013 to July 2018 with major burns (TBSA > 20%) who had an ICY<sup>TM</sup> intravascular warming catheter. Warming catheter insertion and other details were identified with a manual search of the patients' medical records by a single author while incidence of VTE was determined by the coding department from a central database. <i>Results:</i> Forty patients had an intravascular warming catheter inserted during the study period. The number of patients in the catheter group that sustained a VTE was eight (20%), of which four (10%) could have been catheter-related due to the anatomical location. In the cases of the four potentially catheter-related VTE, other preventable VTE risk factors including suboptimal prophylactic anticoagulation (<i>n</i> = 2), prolonged catheter duration (<i>n</i> = 1) and prolonged haemoconcentration (<i>n</i> = 2) were identified. <i>Conclusions:</i> We found 20% of major burns patients with an intravascular warming device had significant VTE; however, only half of these may have been related to the catheter. A careful assessment for each patient that balances risks and benefits should be undertaken prior to using intravascular warming devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"68 1","pages":"80-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj4010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Use of intravascular warming catheters following major burns has been shown to be effective to maintain normothermia, but their use may be associated with complications. The aim of this study was to determine what proportion of patients with an intravascular warming catheter developed a potentially catheter-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) and to identify contributing risk factors. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the Victorian Adult Burns Service January 2013 to July 2018 with major burns (TBSA > 20%) who had an ICYTM intravascular warming catheter. Warming catheter insertion and other details were identified with a manual search of the patients' medical records by a single author while incidence of VTE was determined by the coding department from a central database. Results: Forty patients had an intravascular warming catheter inserted during the study period. The number of patients in the catheter group that sustained a VTE was eight (20%), of which four (10%) could have been catheter-related due to the anatomical location. In the cases of the four potentially catheter-related VTE, other preventable VTE risk factors including suboptimal prophylactic anticoagulation (n = 2), prolonged catheter duration (n = 1) and prolonged haemoconcentration (n = 2) were identified. Conclusions: We found 20% of major burns patients with an intravascular warming device had significant VTE; however, only half of these may have been related to the catheter. A careful assessment for each patient that balances risks and benefits should be undertaken prior to using intravascular warming devices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用血管内加温导管的重度烧伤患者的静脉血栓栓塞:回顾性队列研究
背景:大面积烧伤后使用血管内加温导管可有效维持体温正常,但使用时可能会出现并发症。本研究旨在确定使用血管内加温导管的患者中有多大比例发生了可能与导管相关的静脉血栓栓塞(VTE),并找出诱发风险因素。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2013年1月至2018年7月入住维多利亚州成人烧伤服务机构的重度烧伤(TBSA>20%)患者,这些患者都安装了ICYTM血管内加温导管。一名作者通过手动搜索患者的医疗记录来确定导管插入情况和其他细节,而 VTE 的发生率则由编码部门从中央数据库中确定。结果:40 名患者在研究期间插入了血管内加温导管。导管组中发生 VTE 的患者人数为 8 人(20%),其中 4 人(10%)可能因解剖位置而与导管有关。在这四例可能与导管相关的 VTE 病例中,还发现了其他可预防的 VTE 风险因素,包括预防性抗凝不达标(2 例)、导管持续时间过长(1 例)和血液浓缩时间过长(2 例)。结论我们发现,在使用血管内加温装置的重度烧伤患者中,有 20% 存在严重的 VTE;但其中只有一半可能与导管有关。在使用血管内加温装置之前,应对每位患者进行仔细评估,平衡风险与收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis and Treatment of Infections in the Burn Patient. High-Voltage Electrical Burn Requiring Urgent Scalp Reconstruction after Developing a Brain Abscess. Introduction to the Special Issue on Wars and Disasters: Advancing Care during Times of Crisis. The Successful Treatment of Multi-Resistant Colonized Burns with Large-Area Atmospheric Cold Plasma Therapy and Dermis Substitute Matrix-A Case Report. Sustainable Primary Cell Banking for Topical Compound Cytotoxicity Assays: Protocol Validation on Novel Biocides and Antifungals for Optimized Burn Wound Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1