Do Algorithmic Traders Improve Liquidity When Information Asymmetry is High?

IF 0.9 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Quarterly Journal of Finance Pub Date : 2020-10-27 DOI:10.1142/s2010139220500159
Archana Jain, Chinmay Jain, R. Khanapure
{"title":"Do Algorithmic Traders Improve Liquidity When Information Asymmetry is High?","authors":"Archana Jain, Chinmay Jain, R. Khanapure","doi":"10.1142/s2010139220500159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hendershott et al. (2011, Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity? Journal of Finance 66, 1–33) show that algorithmic traders improve liquidity in equity markets. An equally important and unanswered question is whether they improve liquidity when information asymmetry is high. We use days surrounding earnings announcement as a period of high information asymmetry. First, we follow Hendershott et al. (2011, Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity? Journal of Finance 66, 1–33) to use introduction of NYSE autoquote as a natural experiment. We find that increased algorithmic trading (AT) as a result of NYSE autoquote does not improve liquidity around earnings announcements. Next, we use trade-to-order volume % and cancel rate as a proxy for algorithmic trading and find that abnormal spreads surrounding the days of earnings announcement are significantly higher for stocks with higher AT. Our findings indicate that algorithmic traders reduces their role of liquidity provision in markets when information asymmetry is high. These findings shed further light on the role of liquidity provision by algorithmic traders in the financial markets.","PeriodicalId":45339,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Finance","volume":"1 1","pages":"2050015"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010139220500159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Hendershott et al. (2011, Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity? Journal of Finance 66, 1–33) show that algorithmic traders improve liquidity in equity markets. An equally important and unanswered question is whether they improve liquidity when information asymmetry is high. We use days surrounding earnings announcement as a period of high information asymmetry. First, we follow Hendershott et al. (2011, Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity? Journal of Finance 66, 1–33) to use introduction of NYSE autoquote as a natural experiment. We find that increased algorithmic trading (AT) as a result of NYSE autoquote does not improve liquidity around earnings announcements. Next, we use trade-to-order volume % and cancel rate as a proxy for algorithmic trading and find that abnormal spreads surrounding the days of earnings announcement are significantly higher for stocks with higher AT. Our findings indicate that algorithmic traders reduces their role of liquidity provision in markets when information asymmetry is high. These findings shed further light on the role of liquidity provision by algorithmic traders in the financial markets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当信息不对称程度高时,算法交易者能提高流动性吗?
Hendershott et al.(2011),算法交易提高流动性吗?金融学报,66,1-33)表明算法交易者提高了股票市场的流动性。一个同样重要但尚未解决的问题是,当信息高度不对称时,它们是否会改善流动性。我们将财报公布前后的几天作为信息高度不对称的时期。首先,我们遵循Hendershott et al.(2011),算法交易是否改善流动性?《金融学报》(Journal of Finance) 66, 1-33)将纽约证券交易所的自动报价作为自然实验。我们发现,由于纽约证券交易所自动报价而增加的算法交易(AT)并没有改善收益公告周围的流动性。接下来,我们使用交易订单量百分比和取消率作为算法交易的代理,发现收益公告日周围的异常点差对于具有较高AT的股票显着更高。我们的研究结果表明,当信息不对称高时,算法交易者减少了他们在市场流动性提供中的作用。这些发现进一步揭示了算法交易员在金融市场中提供流动性的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quarterly Journal of Finance
Quarterly Journal of Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of Finance publishes high-quality papers in all areas of finance, including corporate finance, asset pricing, financial econometrics, international finance, macro-finance, behavioral finance, banking and financial intermediation, capital markets, risk management and insurance, derivatives, quantitative finance, corporate governance and compensation, investments and entrepreneurial finance.
期刊最新文献
Trust and Lending: An Experimental Study Non-Cognitive Skills at the Time of COVID-19: An Experiment with Professional Traders and Students Managing Climate Change Risks: Sea-Level Rise and Mergers and Acquisitions The Impact of Role Models on Women’s Self-Selection into Competitive Environments Futures Replication and the Law of One Futures Price
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1