Effect of Chicken Manure-Based Fertiliser on Bacterial Communities and Diversity of Tomato Endosphere Microbiota

Hafeez Ul Haq, Ye Li, Lingyue Jin, Ting Zhang, Linjie Cheng, Z. Li, B. Tian
{"title":"Effect of Chicken Manure-Based Fertiliser on Bacterial Communities and Diversity of Tomato Endosphere Microbiota","authors":"Hafeez Ul Haq, Ye Li, Lingyue Jin, Ting Zhang, Linjie Cheng, Z. Li, B. Tian","doi":"10.2478/agri-2021-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The frequent use of chemical fertiliser produces harmful effects on the soil ecosystem. Therefore, biocompatible methods are used to improve plant health and production through natural fertiliser or plant beneficial microorganisms. This study aims to investigate the effect of amended chicken manure-based natural fertiliser on bacterial communities and plant beneficial bacteria of tomato endosphere microbiome using the high throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. The results showed Proteobacteria (89.4 ± 4.7% to 86.7 ± 3.9%), Actinobacteria (6.03 ± 2.9% to 3.56 ± 2.1%), and Firmicutes (3.34 ± 1.3% to 0.59 ± 0.3%) as the dominant bacterial phyla of tomato endophytic microbiome. Pseudomonas and Bacillus were the most abundant identifiable genera in the chicken manure root (CMR) (amended manure treatments) sample. There was no significant difference in alpha bacterial diversity (Shannon index: p = 0.48) and species richness (Chao 1: p = 0.43) between control original root (OR) and CMR. However, the distribution of the dominant phyla was mainly affected by manure fertilisation. The non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and PCoA of beta diversity analysis suggested a significant separation in bacterial communities of tomato endophytes between CMR and OR. The most differently abundant bacterial taxa belong to Bacteroidetes in the OR group, whereas the beneficial bacterial communities of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes were more abundant in the CMR group. Therefore, the chicken manure application can significantly affect bacterial communities of tomatoes´ root endophytic microbiome and effectively improve the abundance of the beneficial microbes as biofertilisers.","PeriodicalId":7527,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture (Pol'nohospodárstvo)","volume":"19 1","pages":"144 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture (Pol'nohospodárstvo)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/agri-2021-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract The frequent use of chemical fertiliser produces harmful effects on the soil ecosystem. Therefore, biocompatible methods are used to improve plant health and production through natural fertiliser or plant beneficial microorganisms. This study aims to investigate the effect of amended chicken manure-based natural fertiliser on bacterial communities and plant beneficial bacteria of tomato endosphere microbiome using the high throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. The results showed Proteobacteria (89.4 ± 4.7% to 86.7 ± 3.9%), Actinobacteria (6.03 ± 2.9% to 3.56 ± 2.1%), and Firmicutes (3.34 ± 1.3% to 0.59 ± 0.3%) as the dominant bacterial phyla of tomato endophytic microbiome. Pseudomonas and Bacillus were the most abundant identifiable genera in the chicken manure root (CMR) (amended manure treatments) sample. There was no significant difference in alpha bacterial diversity (Shannon index: p = 0.48) and species richness (Chao 1: p = 0.43) between control original root (OR) and CMR. However, the distribution of the dominant phyla was mainly affected by manure fertilisation. The non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and PCoA of beta diversity analysis suggested a significant separation in bacterial communities of tomato endophytes between CMR and OR. The most differently abundant bacterial taxa belong to Bacteroidetes in the OR group, whereas the beneficial bacterial communities of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes were more abundant in the CMR group. Therefore, the chicken manure application can significantly affect bacterial communities of tomatoes´ root endophytic microbiome and effectively improve the abundance of the beneficial microbes as biofertilisers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鸡粪基肥料对番茄内圈细菌群落和微生物多样性的影响
摘要化肥的频繁使用对土壤生态系统产生了有害影响。因此,生物相容性方法被用于通过天然肥料或植物有益微生物来改善植物健康和生产。本研究旨在利用高通量16S rRNA基因扩增子测序技术研究改良鸡粪天然肥料对番茄内圈微生物群细菌群落和植物有益菌群的影响。结果表明,番茄内生菌群的优势菌门分别为变形菌门(89.4±4.7% ~ 86.7±3.9%)、放线菌门(6.03±2.9% ~ 3.56±2.1%)和厚壁菌门(3.34±1.3% ~ 0.59±0.3%)。假单胞菌和芽孢杆菌是鸡粪根(改良粪肥处理)样品中最丰富的可识别属。对照原根(OR)与CMR间α细菌多样性(Shannon指数:p = 0.48)和物种丰富度(Chao 1: p = 0.43)差异不显著。而优势门的分布主要受粪肥施肥的影响。多样性分析的非度量多维尺度(NMDS)和PCoA表明,CMR和OR在番茄内生菌群落上存在显著差异。OR组的细菌类群差异最大的是拟杆菌门,而CMR组的有益菌群更丰富的是放线菌门和厚壁菌门。因此,施用鸡粪可以显著影响番茄根系内生微生物群落,有效提高作为生物肥料的有益微生物丰度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case study – The occurrence of pests in stands of newly introduced energy crops in large-scale pilot experiments in conditions of Central Europe Performance and Yield Stability of Quality Protein Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids under Rainfed Condition Superabsorbent polymer and its effect on maize germination, emergence and genetic diversity of rhizosphere microorganisms Genotype Variation of Polyphenol Content and Antioxidant Activity of Artemisia balchanorum Krasch. × Artemisia taurica Willd Nitrogen release dynamics and carbon sequestration by legume and non-legume cover crops under pure and mixed planting conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1