Safety and health at work as fundamental rights: A comparative-historical study of the ILO's strategy of realistic vigilance

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS International Labour Review Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.1111/ilr.12401
Jeffrey HILGERT
{"title":"Safety and health at work as fundamental rights: A comparative-historical study of the ILO's strategy of realistic vigilance","authors":"Jeffrey HILGERT","doi":"10.1111/ilr.12401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article is a comparative-historical study of ILO action on occupational safety and health (OSH) as fundamental rights. In the two decades following the adoption of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the ILO used a realist lens and prioritized the idea that OSH were dependent upon economic preconditions for their protection. This history is revisited in the light of the new complex of global health uncertainty and the addition of OSH to the framework of fundamental principles and rights at work. The analysis highlights the applicability of a realistic vigilance approach to the ILO's current work on OSH.</p>","PeriodicalId":47216,"journal":{"name":"International Labour Review","volume":"163 1","pages":"95-115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labour Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a comparative-historical study of ILO action on occupational safety and health (OSH) as fundamental rights. In the two decades following the adoption of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the ILO used a realist lens and prioritized the idea that OSH were dependent upon economic preconditions for their protection. This history is revisited in the light of the new complex of global health uncertainty and the addition of OSH to the framework of fundamental principles and rights at work. The analysis highlights the applicability of a realistic vigilance approach to the ILO's current work on OSH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为基本权利的工作安全与健康:国际劳工组织现实警觉战略的历史比较研究
本文对国际劳工组织将职业安全与健康(OSH)作为基本权利的行动进行了历史比较研究。在《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》通过后的二十年里,国际劳工组织采用了现实主义的视角,优先考虑职业安全与健康的保护取决于经济前提的观点。鉴于全球健康不确定性的新复杂性以及职业安全和健康被纳入工作场所基本原则和权利框架,我们重新审视了这段历史。分析强调了现实警惕方法对国际劳工组织当前职业安全和健康工作的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The International Labour Review is the world"s leading multidisciplinary journal of labour market institutions and economics. Its aim is to advance academic research and inform policy debate and decision-making in these fields by bringing together the original thinking of lawyers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and industrial relations specialists on a broad range of labour market policy and social protection concerns. The International Labour Review also features concise reports on current developments considered to be of particular interest to those working in these fields and reviews of recent major publications. It is committed to an editorial policy that combines accessibility with rigorous, insightful analysis and the highest scholarly standards.
期刊最新文献
International Labour Review to move to Open Library of Humanities in 2025 Editorial reviewers Issue Information – TOC Introduction: International experiences of multilevel collective bargaining and lessons for implementation Tracing the potential benefits and complex contingencies of multilevel collective bargaining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1