Profit is a dirty word: the development of the public baths and wash-houses in Britain 1847-1915.

S. Sheard
{"title":"Profit is a dirty word: the development of the public baths and wash-houses in Britain 1847-1915.","authors":"S. Sheard","doi":"10.1093/SHM/13.1.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researh on sanitary reform in nineteenth-century Britain has focused mainly on the introduction of large-sanitary infrastructure, especially waterworks and sewage systems. Other sanitary measures such as the provision of public baths and wash-houses have been ignored, or discussed in the limited context of working-class responses to middle-class sanitarianism. Yet by 1915 public baths and wash-houses were to be found in nearly every British town and city. A detailed analysis of these 'enterprises' can provide a useful way of understanding the changing priorities of public health professionals and urban authorities as well as the changing attitudes of the working classes. Connections between personal cleanliness and disease evolved during the century, particularly after the formation of germ theory in the 1880s. This paper demonstrates how the introduction of public baths and wash-houses in Liverpool, Belfast, and Glasgow was initially a direct response to sanitary reform campaigns. It also shows that the explicit public health ideology of these developments was constantly compromised by implicit concerns about municipal finance and the potential profit that such enterprises could generate. This city-based analysis shows that this conflict hindered the full sanitary benefit which these schemes potentially offered.","PeriodicalId":68213,"journal":{"name":"医疗社会史研究","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"医疗社会史研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/SHM/13.1.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Researh on sanitary reform in nineteenth-century Britain has focused mainly on the introduction of large-sanitary infrastructure, especially waterworks and sewage systems. Other sanitary measures such as the provision of public baths and wash-houses have been ignored, or discussed in the limited context of working-class responses to middle-class sanitarianism. Yet by 1915 public baths and wash-houses were to be found in nearly every British town and city. A detailed analysis of these 'enterprises' can provide a useful way of understanding the changing priorities of public health professionals and urban authorities as well as the changing attitudes of the working classes. Connections between personal cleanliness and disease evolved during the century, particularly after the formation of germ theory in the 1880s. This paper demonstrates how the introduction of public baths and wash-houses in Liverpool, Belfast, and Glasgow was initially a direct response to sanitary reform campaigns. It also shows that the explicit public health ideology of these developments was constantly compromised by implicit concerns about municipal finance and the potential profit that such enterprises could generate. This city-based analysis shows that this conflict hindered the full sanitary benefit which these schemes potentially offered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利润是一个肮脏的词:1847年至1915年英国公共浴室和洗衣房的发展。
对19世纪英国卫生改革的研究主要集中在引进大型卫生基础设施,特别是自来水厂和污水处理系统。其他卫生措施,如提供公共浴室和洗衣房,要么被忽视,要么在工人阶级回应中产阶级卫生主义的有限背景下被讨论。然而,到1915年,几乎每个英国城镇都能找到公共浴室和洗衣房。对这些"企业"的详细分析可以为了解公共卫生专业人员和城市当局不断变化的优先事项以及工人阶级不断变化的态度提供有用的方法。个人清洁和疾病之间的联系在20世纪不断发展,特别是在19世纪80年代细菌理论形成之后。本文展示了在利物浦、贝尔法斯特和格拉斯哥引入公共浴室和洗衣房最初是对卫生改革运动的直接回应。它还表明,这些发展的明确的公共卫生意识形态不断受到对市政财政和这些企业可能产生的潜在利润的隐性关切的损害。这项以城市为基础的分析表明,这种冲突阻碍了这些计划可能提供的全部卫生效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The 'Miracle of Childbirth': the Portrayal of Parturient Women in Medieval Miracle Narratives. Erratum: Beyond the Medical Text: Health and Illness in Early Medieval Italian Sources. Review: A Social History of Psychology The Chinese Medicine in Contemporary China: Plurality and Synthesis Medical education at St Bartholomew's hospital 1123-1995
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1