Sample Size Requirements for Parameter Recovery in the 4-Parameter Logistic Model

IF 0.6 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/15366367.2021.1934805
Ismail Cuhadar
{"title":"Sample Size Requirements for Parameter Recovery in the 4-Parameter Logistic Model","authors":"Ismail Cuhadar","doi":"10.1080/15366367.2021.1934805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In practice, some test items may display misfit at the upper-asymptote of item characteristic curve due to distraction, anxiety, or carelessness by the test takers (i.e., the slipping effect). The conventional item response theory (IRT) models do not take the slipping effect into consideration, which may violate the model fit assumption in IRT. The 4-parameter logistic model (4PLM) includes a parameter for the misfit at the upper-asymptote. Although the 4PLM took more attention by researchers in recent years, there are a few studies on the sample size requirements for the 4PLM in the literature. The current study investigated the sample size requirements for the parameter recovery in the 4PLM with a systematic simulation study design. Results indicated that the item parameters in the 4PLM can be estimated accurately when the sample size is at least 4000, and the person parameters, excluding the extreme ends of the ability scale, can be estimated accurately for the conditions with a sample size of at least 750.","PeriodicalId":46596,"journal":{"name":"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives","volume":"39 1","pages":"57 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2021.1934805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In practice, some test items may display misfit at the upper-asymptote of item characteristic curve due to distraction, anxiety, or carelessness by the test takers (i.e., the slipping effect). The conventional item response theory (IRT) models do not take the slipping effect into consideration, which may violate the model fit assumption in IRT. The 4-parameter logistic model (4PLM) includes a parameter for the misfit at the upper-asymptote. Although the 4PLM took more attention by researchers in recent years, there are a few studies on the sample size requirements for the 4PLM in the literature. The current study investigated the sample size requirements for the parameter recovery in the 4PLM with a systematic simulation study design. Results indicated that the item parameters in the 4PLM can be estimated accurately when the sample size is at least 4000, and the person parameters, excluding the extreme ends of the ability scale, can be estimated accurately for the conditions with a sample size of at least 750.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四参数Logistic模型中参数恢复的样本量要求
在实际操作中,由于受试者的注意力分散、焦虑或粗心大意,一些测试项目可能在项目特征曲线的上渐近线处出现不拟合(即滑动效应)。传统的项目反应理论(IRT)模型没有考虑滑动效应,这可能违反了IRT的模型拟合假设。四参数逻辑模型(4PLM)包含了上渐近线处失配的参数。虽然近年来4PLM越来越受到研究者的关注,但文献中对4PLM的样本量要求的研究较少。本研究通过系统模拟研究设计,研究了4PLM中参数恢复的样本量要求。结果表明,当样本量在4000以上时,4PLM中的项目参数可以被准确估计;当样本量在750以上时,人的参数(不包括能力量表的极端端)可以被准确估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives
Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
A Latent Trait Approach to the Measurement of Physical Fitness Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Fake News Classification The Use of Multidimensional Item Response Theory Estimations in Controlling Differential Item Functioning Opinion Instability and Measurement Errors: A G-Theory Analysis of College Students Predicting the Risk of Diabetes and Heart Disease with Machine Learning Classifiers: The Mediation Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1