Classroom or online learning? Impact of experiential learning in business process management education

IF 2.5 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-10 DOI:10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.012
{"title":"Classroom or online learning? Impact of experiential learning in business process management education","authors":"","doi":"10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an empirical study with 150 graduate students at a business school to analyse the educational impact of experiential learning about process-oriented thinking in the classroom versus online learning setting. The results show that both learning settings are effective in increasing student performance but the increase in student performance in the face-to-face setting is twice as much as that in the e-learning setting. While learning time has no impact on student performance in this study, active engagement in the learning process has a positive impact in the online learning setting, but not in the face-to-face setting. Contrary to general findings, the results of this study indicate that a face-to-face setting is preferable for experiential learning about process-oriented thinking. Practical implications are that online learning can be used for general understanding while classroom learning is preferred for deeper understanding in the context of experiential learning about process-oriented thinking.","PeriodicalId":45327,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper presents an empirical study with 150 graduate students at a business school to analyse the educational impact of experiential learning about process-oriented thinking in the classroom versus online learning setting. The results show that both learning settings are effective in increasing student performance but the increase in student performance in the face-to-face setting is twice as much as that in the e-learning setting. While learning time has no impact on student performance in this study, active engagement in the learning process has a positive impact in the online learning setting, but not in the face-to-face setting. Contrary to general findings, the results of this study indicate that a face-to-face setting is preferable for experiential learning about process-oriented thinking. Practical implications are that online learning can be used for general understanding while classroom learning is preferred for deeper understanding in the context of experiential learning about process-oriented thinking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
课堂学习还是在线学习?体验式学习对业务流程管理教育的影响
本文提出了一项对某商学院150名研究生的实证研究,以分析在课堂上与在线学习环境中体验式学习对过程导向思维的教育影响。结果表明,两种学习环境都能有效地提高学生的成绩,但面对面学习环境对学生成绩的提高是电子学习环境的两倍。虽然在本研究中,学习时间对学生的表现没有影响,但在在线学习环境中,积极参与学习过程对学生的表现有积极影响,而在面对面学习环境中则没有。与一般研究结果相反,本研究的结果表明,面对面的环境更适合体验式学习过程导向思维。实际意义是,在线学习可以用于一般理解,而课堂学习更适合在体验式学习的背景下对过程导向思维进行更深入的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
A scoping review comparing different mapping approaches pointing to the need for standardizing concept maps in medical education: A preliminary analysis Analyzing the syntax and salience of causal links embedded within semantic links in concept maps: Implications for temporal flow and learning transfer Concept maps for formative assessment: Creation and implementation of an automatic and intelligent evaluation method Editorial: Concept mapping: Improving learning and understanding Improving learning and understanding through concept mapping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1