{"title":"WOMEN IN THE WESTERN Ed. Sue Matheson. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2020. 360 pp. $110.00 hardcover.","authors":"Katarzyna Nowak-McNeice","doi":"10.1080/01956051.2021.1987833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"streaming media: this is what happens when Jackson’s short novel becomes a Netflix property. To fill hours of programming, The Haunting of Hill House needs to be greatly expanded; to fit into the existing mold the story must incorporate a steady dose of jump scares and Stranger Things–style cliffhangers; to invite repeat screenings it needs a host of webpage-baiting Easter eggs (hello Russ Tamblyn!). Indeed, a more transparent Netflix would have used this book’s title itself. The issue extends beyond curmudgeonly grumbling about this series’ lack of fidelity, or wrongheadedly advocating for a return to those barren “fidelity” days of adaptation studies. Even more address from the contributors on the union of Netflix—and other streaming services—with literary properties would have been welcome (but please note that this volume does not condemn such discussion). It seems almost as though artists like Flanagan, and audiences, can conform with the dictates of streaming media culture or abandon new audio-visual media completely. It is not only Jackson fans, Henry James aficionados, or English professors who are anxious about a future littered with literary adaptations that feel more like The Mandalorian (2019–) than the seemingly annual BBC versions of Austen novels. Or, though Austen’s work survived a zombie invasion, must we rejoice in Baby Yoda gifs from the next Pride and Prejudice? Paul N. Reinsch Texas Tech University","PeriodicalId":44169,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION","volume":"4 1","pages":"234 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2021.1987833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
streaming media: this is what happens when Jackson’s short novel becomes a Netflix property. To fill hours of programming, The Haunting of Hill House needs to be greatly expanded; to fit into the existing mold the story must incorporate a steady dose of jump scares and Stranger Things–style cliffhangers; to invite repeat screenings it needs a host of webpage-baiting Easter eggs (hello Russ Tamblyn!). Indeed, a more transparent Netflix would have used this book’s title itself. The issue extends beyond curmudgeonly grumbling about this series’ lack of fidelity, or wrongheadedly advocating for a return to those barren “fidelity” days of adaptation studies. Even more address from the contributors on the union of Netflix—and other streaming services—with literary properties would have been welcome (but please note that this volume does not condemn such discussion). It seems almost as though artists like Flanagan, and audiences, can conform with the dictates of streaming media culture or abandon new audio-visual media completely. It is not only Jackson fans, Henry James aficionados, or English professors who are anxious about a future littered with literary adaptations that feel more like The Mandalorian (2019–) than the seemingly annual BBC versions of Austen novels. Or, though Austen’s work survived a zombie invasion, must we rejoice in Baby Yoda gifs from the next Pride and Prejudice? Paul N. Reinsch Texas Tech University
期刊介绍:
How did Casablanca affect the home front during World War II? What is the postfeminist significance of Buffy the Vampire Slayer? The Journal of Popular Film and Television answers such far-ranging questions by using the methods of popular culture studies to examine commercial film and television, historical and contemporary. Articles discuss networks, genres, series, and audiences, as well as celebrity stars, directors, and studios. Regular features include essays on the social and cultural background of films and television programs, filmographies, bibliographies, and commissioned book and video reviews.