Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-PI-R self-evaluation form in Slovak translation

Elena Lisá, Michael Dzúrik
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-PI-R self-evaluation form in Slovak translation","authors":"Elena Lisá, Michael Dzúrik","doi":"10.24913/rjap.23.1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to verify the psychometric properties of the 100-item HEXACO-PI-R questionnaire. The sample consisted of 1624 adults aged from 16 to 79 years (M=34.5, SD=13.35) who filled the paper-pen self-report form of the HEXACO-PI-R. The average internal consistency of the six factors was α=.78 (from .72 for Openness to .81 for Honesty-Humility) and α=.60 for facets. The Altruism scale in the Slovak translation did not reach a satisfactory internal consistency (α=.29). Mean values in the Slovak-speaking sample were 3.29, and standard deviations .53 for factor level and .74 at the facet level. Sex differences showed the higher Emotionality (d=.99) and Honesty-Humility (d= .38) in women. Age differences in Honesty-Humility showed a medium effect size. Factors did not inter-correlate, or they correlated weakly, except for r=.34 in the relationship between Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility. The factors were well distinguished from one another. The exploratory factor analysis with Promax rotation confirmed the six-factor model, which explained in total 44% of data variance, with an average loading of .60. Individual one-factor models met most of the goodness of fit criteria in confirmatory factor analysis, but the six-factor model did not meet them. The controversy associated with assessing the internal structure of multidimensional personality inventories by confirmatory factor analysis is discussed. According to the currently published research studies, the research findings supported the reliability and internal validity of HEXACO-PI-R in Slovak translation.","PeriodicalId":36595,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24913/rjap.23.1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study aimed to verify the psychometric properties of the 100-item HEXACO-PI-R questionnaire. The sample consisted of 1624 adults aged from 16 to 79 years (M=34.5, SD=13.35) who filled the paper-pen self-report form of the HEXACO-PI-R. The average internal consistency of the six factors was α=.78 (from .72 for Openness to .81 for Honesty-Humility) and α=.60 for facets. The Altruism scale in the Slovak translation did not reach a satisfactory internal consistency (α=.29). Mean values in the Slovak-speaking sample were 3.29, and standard deviations .53 for factor level and .74 at the facet level. Sex differences showed the higher Emotionality (d=.99) and Honesty-Humility (d= .38) in women. Age differences in Honesty-Humility showed a medium effect size. Factors did not inter-correlate, or they correlated weakly, except for r=.34 in the relationship between Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility. The factors were well distinguished from one another. The exploratory factor analysis with Promax rotation confirmed the six-factor model, which explained in total 44% of data variance, with an average loading of .60. Individual one-factor models met most of the goodness of fit criteria in confirmatory factor analysis, but the six-factor model did not meet them. The controversy associated with assessing the internal structure of multidimensional personality inventories by confirmatory factor analysis is discussed. According to the currently published research studies, the research findings supported the reliability and internal validity of HEXACO-PI-R in Slovak translation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯洛伐克语翻译中HEXACO-PI-R自评表的心理测量特征
本研究旨在验证100项HEXACO-PI-R问卷的心理测量特性。样本包括1624名年龄在16 ~ 79岁之间的成年人(M=34.5, SD=13.35),他们填写了HEXACO-PI-R纸笔自我报告表格。6个因子的平均内部一致性为α= 0.78(从开放的0.72到诚实-谦卑的0.81)和α=。facet为60。斯洛伐克语翻译中的利他主义量表没有达到令人满意的内部一致性(α= 0.29)。讲斯洛伐克语的样本的平均值为3.29,因子水平的标准差为0.53,面水平的标准差为0.74。性别差异显示,女性的情感(d= 0.99)和诚实-谦卑(d= 0.38)更高。诚实-谦卑的年龄差异显示中等效应量。除r=外,各因素之间没有相互关联,或者相关性较弱。在随和和诚实-谦卑之间的关系。这些因素彼此区分得很清楚。Promax旋转探索性因子分析证实了六因子模型,该模型解释了总共44%的数据方差,平均负载为0.60。在验证性因子分析中,单个单因素模型符合大部分拟合优度标准,而六因素模型不符合。本文讨论了验证性因素分析评估多维人格量表内部结构的争议。根据目前发表的研究,研究结果支持HEXACO-PI-R在斯洛伐克语翻译中的信度和内部效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology
Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology Psychology-Applied Psychology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Emotional labor strategies and counterproductive work behavior: A social exchange theory approach A Study on Birth Order and Sense of Overall Responsibility in Undergraduate Students of Lahore, Pakistan Moroccan version of the Social Connectedness and Social Assurance Scales Facing the unvaccinated: emotions, stereotypes, and the desire for punishment during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany Relationship between Instagram Users’ Information-Sharing Behavior and Nature Relatedness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1