{"title":"Folklore in Regional Dictionaries: Twentieth- and Twenty-First-Century Examples from England","authors":"J. Roper","doi":"10.1080/0015587x.2022.2157950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Dictionaries are an increasingly acknowledged source of folklore data. For countries with early literacy, industrialization, and urbanization, such as England, this richness is evident for early modern and, especially, nineteenth-century dictionaries, such as those published by the English Dialect Society. Although not as numerous as before, regional dictionaries have, nevertheless, continued to be published in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. This article surveys such publications from the point of view of what they might tell us about recent folklore. Might these works be as rich in folklore as their predecessors? And, if they are potentially useful folklore sources, what might be their especial virtues and what might be their blind spots? Do the generalizations it was possible to draw from the nineteenth-century material hold for works from this later period?","PeriodicalId":45773,"journal":{"name":"FOLKLORE","volume":"63 1","pages":"226 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FOLKLORE","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587x.2022.2157950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Dictionaries are an increasingly acknowledged source of folklore data. For countries with early literacy, industrialization, and urbanization, such as England, this richness is evident for early modern and, especially, nineteenth-century dictionaries, such as those published by the English Dialect Society. Although not as numerous as before, regional dictionaries have, nevertheless, continued to be published in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. This article surveys such publications from the point of view of what they might tell us about recent folklore. Might these works be as rich in folklore as their predecessors? And, if they are potentially useful folklore sources, what might be their especial virtues and what might be their blind spots? Do the generalizations it was possible to draw from the nineteenth-century material hold for works from this later period?
期刊介绍:
A fully peer-reviewed international journal of folklore and folkloristics. Folklore is one of the earliest journals in the field of folkloristics, first published as The Folk-Lore Record in 1878. Folklore publishes ethnographical and analytical essays on vernacular culture worldwide, specializing in traditional narrative, language, music, song, dance, drama, foodways, medicine, arts and crafts, popular religion, and belief. It reviews current studies in a wide range of adjacent disciplines including anthropology, cultural studies, ethnology, history, literature, and religion. Folklore prides itself on its special mix of reviews, analysis, ethnography, and debate; its combination of European and North American approaches to the study of folklore; and its coverage not only of the materials and processes of folklore, but also of the history, methods, and theory of folkloristics. Folklore aims to be lively, informative and accessible, while maintaining high standards of scholarship.