Supply Chain Contracts that Prevent Information Leakage

IF 0.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Manufacturing Engineering Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2728017
Yiwei Chen, Ö. Özer
{"title":"Supply Chain Contracts that Prevent Information Leakage","authors":"Yiwei Chen, Ö. Özer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2728017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper determines two groups of contracts -- downside-protection and upside-protection contracts -- that facilitate vertical information sharing in a supply chain while precluding horizontal information leakage among competing newsvendors. In particular, we consider a supply chain in which retailers replenish inventory from a common supplier to satisfy uncertain demand and are engaged in newsvendor competition. Each retailer has imperfect demand information. Yet, one of the retailers (the incumbent) has a more accurate demand forecast than the other (the entrant). Substantial anecdotal evidence and academic research have shown that information leakage among such competing retailers precludes vertical information sharing and is a reason for retailers to abandon collaborative forecast-sharing initiatives, leading to sub-optimized supply chains. We show that whether a contract can prevent information leakage is due only to how the supply chain's expected supply-demand mismatch costs are distributed among the supplier and retailers, but does not depend on each party's expected revenue. In addition, we show that wholesale-price contracts and two-part tariff contracts, which are extensively used in practice, cannot prevent information leakage. By using the wholesale-price contract as a benchmark contract, we determine that downside-protection contracts and upside-protection contracts can prevent information leakage. We define a downside-protection contract as one that effectively reduces retailers' cost of excess inventory by shifting some of their overage cost to the supplier. Examples of such contracts include buy-back and revenue-sharing contracts. We define an upside-protection contract as one that effectively increases retailers' cost of inventory shortage by shifting some of the supplier's underage cost to retailers. Examples of such contracts include penalty and rebate contracts. We show that these two groups of contracts can prevent information leakage. We identify necessary and sufficient nonleakage conditions and mechanisms for each group to prevent information leakage in the supply chain.","PeriodicalId":49886,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2728017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

This paper determines two groups of contracts -- downside-protection and upside-protection contracts -- that facilitate vertical information sharing in a supply chain while precluding horizontal information leakage among competing newsvendors. In particular, we consider a supply chain in which retailers replenish inventory from a common supplier to satisfy uncertain demand and are engaged in newsvendor competition. Each retailer has imperfect demand information. Yet, one of the retailers (the incumbent) has a more accurate demand forecast than the other (the entrant). Substantial anecdotal evidence and academic research have shown that information leakage among such competing retailers precludes vertical information sharing and is a reason for retailers to abandon collaborative forecast-sharing initiatives, leading to sub-optimized supply chains. We show that whether a contract can prevent information leakage is due only to how the supply chain's expected supply-demand mismatch costs are distributed among the supplier and retailers, but does not depend on each party's expected revenue. In addition, we show that wholesale-price contracts and two-part tariff contracts, which are extensively used in practice, cannot prevent information leakage. By using the wholesale-price contract as a benchmark contract, we determine that downside-protection contracts and upside-protection contracts can prevent information leakage. We define a downside-protection contract as one that effectively reduces retailers' cost of excess inventory by shifting some of their overage cost to the supplier. Examples of such contracts include buy-back and revenue-sharing contracts. We define an upside-protection contract as one that effectively increases retailers' cost of inventory shortage by shifting some of the supplier's underage cost to retailers. Examples of such contracts include penalty and rebate contracts. We show that these two groups of contracts can prevent information leakage. We identify necessary and sufficient nonleakage conditions and mechanisms for each group to prevent information leakage in the supply chain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
防止信息泄露的供应链契约
本文确定了两组合同——下行保护合同和上行保护合同——它们促进了供应链中的垂直信息共享,同时防止了竞争新闻供应商之间的横向信息泄露。特别地,我们考虑一个供应链,其中零售商从一个共同的供应商补充库存,以满足不确定的需求,并从事新闻供应商竞争。每个零售商都有不完全的需求信息。然而,其中一个零售商(在位者)比另一个零售商(进入者)有更准确的需求预测。大量的轶事证据和学术研究表明,这些竞争零售商之间的信息泄露阻碍了垂直信息共享,这是零售商放弃协作预测共享举措的一个原因,导致供应链次优化。研究表明,契约能否防止信息泄露仅取决于供应链的预期供需不匹配成本如何在供应商和零售商之间分配,而不取决于每一方的预期收入。此外,我们还证明了在实践中广泛使用的批发价格合同和两部分关税合同不能防止信息泄露。以批发价格合约作为基准合约,我们确定了下保护合约和上保护合约可以防止信息泄露。我们将下行保护合同定义为通过将一些超额成本转移给供应商来有效降低零售商过剩库存成本的合同。这类合同的例子包括回购合同和收入分成合同。我们将上行保护合同定义为通过将供应商的一些未成年成本转移给零售商来有效地增加零售商库存短缺成本的合同。这类合同的例子包括罚款合同和回扣合同。我们证明了这两组合约可以防止信息泄露。我们为每个小组确定必要和充分的非泄漏条件和机制,以防止供应链中的信息泄漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Manufacturing Engineering
Manufacturing Engineering 工程技术-工程:制造
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Capacity Co-Opetition in Service Clusters with Waiting-area Entertainment Cloud-Kitchens in High-Density Cities: Economies of Scale Through Co-Location Credit Chain and Sectoral Co-movement: A Multi-Region Investigation Approximations for the Lead Time Variance: A Forecasting and Inventory Evaluation Reselling or Agency Selling? Consumer Valuation, Quality Design, and Manufacturers' Competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1