What Edits are Done on the Highly Answered Questions in Stack Overflow? An Empirical Study

Xianhao Jin, Francisco Servant
{"title":"What Edits are Done on the Highly Answered Questions in Stack Overflow? An Empirical Study","authors":"Xianhao Jin, Francisco Servant","doi":"10.1109/MSR.2019.00045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stack Overflow is the most-widely-used online question-and-answer platform for software developers to solve problems and communicate experience. Stack Overflow believes in the power of community editing, which means that one is able to edit questions without the changes going through peer review. Stack Overflow users may make edits to questions for a variety of reasons, among others, to improve the question and try to obtain more answers. However, to date the relationship between edit actions on questions and the number of answers that they collect is unknown. In this paper, we perform an empirical study on Stack Overflow to understand the relationship between edit actions and number of answers obtained in different dimensions from different attributes of the edited questions. We find that questions are more commonly edited by question owners, on bodies with relatively big changes before obtaining an accepted answer. However, edited questions that obtained more answers in a shorter time, were edited by other users rather than question owners, and their edits tended to be small, focused on titles and in adding addendums.","PeriodicalId":6706,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","volume":"31 4 1","pages":"225-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2019.00045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Stack Overflow is the most-widely-used online question-and-answer platform for software developers to solve problems and communicate experience. Stack Overflow believes in the power of community editing, which means that one is able to edit questions without the changes going through peer review. Stack Overflow users may make edits to questions for a variety of reasons, among others, to improve the question and try to obtain more answers. However, to date the relationship between edit actions on questions and the number of answers that they collect is unknown. In this paper, we perform an empirical study on Stack Overflow to understand the relationship between edit actions and number of answers obtained in different dimensions from different attributes of the edited questions. We find that questions are more commonly edited by question owners, on bodies with relatively big changes before obtaining an accepted answer. However, edited questions that obtained more answers in a shorter time, were edited by other users rather than question owners, and their edits tended to be small, focused on titles and in adding addendums.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对堆栈溢出中高度回答的问题进行了哪些编辑?实证研究
Stack Overflow是软件开发人员解决问题和交流经验的最广泛使用的在线问答平台。Stack Overflow相信社区编辑的力量,这意味着人们可以编辑问题而无需经过同行评审。Stack Overflow用户可能出于各种原因对问题进行编辑,其中包括改进问题并尝试获得更多答案。然而,到目前为止,问题的编辑操作与它们收集的答案数量之间的关系是未知的。本文通过Stack Overflow的实证研究,了解编辑行为与被编辑问题的不同属性在不同维度上获得的答案数之间的关系。我们发现问题通常是由问题所有者编辑的,在得到一个公认的答案之前,问题的主体变化相对较大。然而,在较短时间内获得更多答案的编辑问题是由其他用户而不是问题所有者编辑的,他们的编辑往往很小,主要集中在标题和添加附录上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SeSaMe: A Data Set of Semantically Similar Java Methods Lessons Learned from Using a Deep Tree-Based Model for Software Defect Prediction in Practice STRAIT: A Tool for Automated Software Reliability Growth Analysis Assessing Diffusion and Perception of Test Smells in Scala Projects An Empirical History of Permission Requests and Mistakes in Open Source Android Apps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1