PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE VACCINE CONSPIRACY BELIEFS SCALE, THE EPISTEMIC BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIRE, AND THE CYNICAL DISTRUST SCALE IN A UKRAINIAN SAMPLE

Q4 Social Sciences Russian Psychological Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-30 DOI:10.31108/1.2023.9.4.2
I. Danyliuk, A. Kurapov, Illya Yagiyaev, Karine Malysheva, O.Yu. Loshenko, Serhii Lytvyn
{"title":"PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE VACCINE CONSPIRACY BELIEFS SCALE, THE EPISTEMIC BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIRE, AND THE CYNICAL DISTRUST SCALE IN A UKRAINIAN SAMPLE","authors":"I. Danyliuk, A. Kurapov, Illya Yagiyaev, Karine Malysheva, O.Yu. Loshenko, Serhii Lytvyn","doi":"10.31108/1.2023.9.4.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current issues in Ukraine, such as declining vaccination rates, increasing belief in conspiracy theories, and rising levels of hostility, necessitate the use of effective tools for assessment. The Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale (VCBS), Epistemic Beliefs Questionnaire, and Cook-Medley Cynical Hostility Scale (Ho) offer valuable instruments to collect reliable data and facilitate necessary interventions. The Vaccine Conspiracy Belief Scale (VCBS) is a 7-item instrument that assesses an individual's tendency to believe in deceptive information regarding vaccination and related health conditions. The Epistemic Beliefs Questionnaire measures an individual's ability to reason about the political or scientific world. It consists of three subscales, evaluating intuitive understanding of facts, willingness to examine evidence to analyze facts, and belief in the relationship between facts and policy. The questionnaire comprises 12 statements. The Cook-Medley Cynical Hostility Scale (50 items) provides a general assessment of a person's cynicism, hostility, and aggressive reactions. The Cynical Distrust subscale includes 5 statements representing hypothetical views on the actions, behavior, or opinions of others. Our study aimed to test the psychometric properties of the Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale, the Epistemic Beliefs Questionnaire, and the Cynical Distrust subscale of the Cook-Madley Cynical Hostility Scale (Ho), translated into Ukrainian. We recruited 392 Ukrainian-speaking respondents for the study. The scales underwent evaluation and statistical analysis using Cronbach's alpha, correlation analysis, principal components analysis, exploratory, and confirmatory factor analyses. The components of the Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale demonstrated a high level of reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.95). Principal components analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and Comparative Fit Index (CFI) indicated a one-factor structure of the scale with a high degree of item fit. The Epistemic Beliefs Questionnaire showed good internal consistency and reliability (α = 0.84) and displayed a three-factor structure. The Cynical Distrust subscale of the Cook-Madley Cynical Hostility Scale demonstrated acceptable indicators of reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.73) and showed a one-factor structure with a high degree of fit. The Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale, the Epistemic Beliefs Questionnaire, and the Cynical Distrust subscale of the Cook-Madley Hostility Scale (Ho) are effective assessment tools and can be used with the Ukrainian population.","PeriodicalId":36154,"journal":{"name":"Russian Psychological Journal","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Psychological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2023.9.4.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current issues in Ukraine, such as declining vaccination rates, increasing belief in conspiracy theories, and rising levels of hostility, necessitate the use of effective tools for assessment. The Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale (VCBS), Epistemic Beliefs Questionnaire, and Cook-Medley Cynical Hostility Scale (Ho) offer valuable instruments to collect reliable data and facilitate necessary interventions. The Vaccine Conspiracy Belief Scale (VCBS) is a 7-item instrument that assesses an individual's tendency to believe in deceptive information regarding vaccination and related health conditions. The Epistemic Beliefs Questionnaire measures an individual's ability to reason about the political or scientific world. It consists of three subscales, evaluating intuitive understanding of facts, willingness to examine evidence to analyze facts, and belief in the relationship between facts and policy. The questionnaire comprises 12 statements. The Cook-Medley Cynical Hostility Scale (50 items) provides a general assessment of a person's cynicism, hostility, and aggressive reactions. The Cynical Distrust subscale includes 5 statements representing hypothetical views on the actions, behavior, or opinions of others. Our study aimed to test the psychometric properties of the Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale, the Epistemic Beliefs Questionnaire, and the Cynical Distrust subscale of the Cook-Madley Cynical Hostility Scale (Ho), translated into Ukrainian. We recruited 392 Ukrainian-speaking respondents for the study. The scales underwent evaluation and statistical analysis using Cronbach's alpha, correlation analysis, principal components analysis, exploratory, and confirmatory factor analyses. The components of the Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale demonstrated a high level of reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.95). Principal components analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and Comparative Fit Index (CFI) indicated a one-factor structure of the scale with a high degree of item fit. The Epistemic Beliefs Questionnaire showed good internal consistency and reliability (α = 0.84) and displayed a three-factor structure. The Cynical Distrust subscale of the Cook-Madley Cynical Hostility Scale demonstrated acceptable indicators of reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.73) and showed a one-factor structure with a high degree of fit. The Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale, the Epistemic Beliefs Questionnaire, and the Cynical Distrust subscale of the Cook-Madley Hostility Scale (Ho) are effective assessment tools and can be used with the Ukrainian population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰样本中疫苗阴谋信念量表、认知信念问卷和愤世嫉俗不信任量表的心理测量特性
乌克兰目前的问题,如疫苗接种率下降、对阴谋论的信仰增加以及敌意程度上升,需要使用有效的评估工具。疫苗阴谋信念量表(VCBS)、认知信念问卷和Cook-Medley愤世嫉俗敌意量表(Ho)为收集可靠数据和促进必要的干预提供了有价值的工具。疫苗阴谋信念量表(VCBS)是一个由7个项目组成的工具,用于评估个人相信有关疫苗接种和相关健康状况的欺骗性信息的倾向。认知信念问卷衡量个人对政治或科学世界的推理能力。它由三个子量表组成,评估对事实的直觉理解,审查证据以分析事实的意愿,以及对事实与政策之间关系的信念。问卷包括12个陈述。Cook-Medley愤世嫉俗敌意量表(50个项目)提供了一个人的愤世嫉俗,敌意和攻击性反应的总体评估。愤世嫉俗的不信任子量表包括5个陈述,代表对他人行为、行为或观点的假设性看法。我们的研究旨在测试疫苗阴谋信念量表、认知信念问卷和Cook-Madley愤世嫉俗敌意量表(Ho)的愤世嫉俗不信任子量表(翻译成乌克兰语)的心理测量特性。我们为这项研究招募了392名说乌克兰语的受访者。采用Cronbach’s alpha、相关分析、主成分分析、探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析对量表进行评价和统计分析。疫苗阴谋信念量表各成分具有较高的信度和内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha > 0.95)。主成分分析、探索性因子分析(EFA)和比较拟合指数(CFI)表明量表具有单因素结构,项目拟合程度较高。认知信念问卷具有良好的内部一致性和信度(α = 0.84),呈现三因子结构。Cook-Madley愤世嫉俗敌意量表愤世嫉俗不信任子量表的信度和内部一致性指标均为可接受的(Cronbach’s alpha > 0.73),且呈现高度拟合的单因素结构。疫苗阴谋信念量表、认知信念问卷和库克-马德利敌意量表(Ho)的愤世嫉俗不信任子量表是有效的评估工具,可用于乌克兰人口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Psychological Journal
Russian Psychological Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Аппаратно-программный комплекс для проведения тензотреморометрических измерений в психофизиологических исследованиях Основные результаты исследования механизмов психической саморегуляции на основе метода оценки матрицы базальных эмоций Взаимосвязь психологического капитала и выбора студентами позиций взаимодействия и стратегий самоутверждения Процесс сравнения изображений эмоциональных экспрессий Happiness in the Workplace of Women Lecturers Based on Work-Family Balance and Work Engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1