The Effects of Particle Segregation on Debris Flow Fluidity Over a Rigid Bed

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental & Engineering Geoscience Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.2113/EEG-D-20-00106
N. Hotta, T. Iwata, Takuro Suzuki, Y. Sakai
{"title":"The Effects of Particle Segregation on Debris Flow Fluidity Over a Rigid Bed","authors":"N. Hotta, T. Iwata, Takuro Suzuki, Y. Sakai","doi":"10.2113/EEG-D-20-00106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n It is essential to consider the fluidity of a debris flow front when calculating its impact. Here we flume-tested mono-granular and bi-granular debris flows and compared the results to those of numerical simulations. We used sand particles with diameters of 0.29 and 0.14 cm at two mixing ratios of 1:1 and 3:7. Particle segregation was recorded with a high-speed video camera. We evaluated the fronts of debris flows at 0.5-second intervals. Then we numerically simulated one-dimensional debris flows under the same conditions and used the mean particle diameter when simulating mixed-diameter flows. For the mono-granular debris flows, the experimental and simulated results showed good agreement in terms of flow depth, front velocity, and flux. However, for the bi-granular debris flows, the simulated flow depth was less, and both the front velocity and flux were greater than those found experimentally. These differences may be attributable to the fact that the dominant shear stress was caused by the concentration of smaller sediment particles in the lower flow layers; such inverse gradations were detected in the debris flow bodies. Under these conditions, most shear stress is supported by smaller particles in the lower layers; the debris flow characteristics become similar to those of mono-granular flows, in contrast to the numerical simulation, which incorporated particle segregation with gradually decreasing mean diameter from the front to the flow body. Consequently, the calculated front velocities were underestimated; particle segregation at the front of the bi-granular debris flows did not affect fluidity either initially or over time.","PeriodicalId":50518,"journal":{"name":"Environmental & Engineering Geoscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental & Engineering Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2113/EEG-D-20-00106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

It is essential to consider the fluidity of a debris flow front when calculating its impact. Here we flume-tested mono-granular and bi-granular debris flows and compared the results to those of numerical simulations. We used sand particles with diameters of 0.29 and 0.14 cm at two mixing ratios of 1:1 and 3:7. Particle segregation was recorded with a high-speed video camera. We evaluated the fronts of debris flows at 0.5-second intervals. Then we numerically simulated one-dimensional debris flows under the same conditions and used the mean particle diameter when simulating mixed-diameter flows. For the mono-granular debris flows, the experimental and simulated results showed good agreement in terms of flow depth, front velocity, and flux. However, for the bi-granular debris flows, the simulated flow depth was less, and both the front velocity and flux were greater than those found experimentally. These differences may be attributable to the fact that the dominant shear stress was caused by the concentration of smaller sediment particles in the lower flow layers; such inverse gradations were detected in the debris flow bodies. Under these conditions, most shear stress is supported by smaller particles in the lower layers; the debris flow characteristics become similar to those of mono-granular flows, in contrast to the numerical simulation, which incorporated particle segregation with gradually decreasing mean diameter from the front to the flow body. Consequently, the calculated front velocities were underestimated; particle segregation at the front of the bi-granular debris flows did not affect fluidity either initially or over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颗粒偏析对刚性床上泥石流流动性的影响
在计算泥石流锋面的冲击时,必须考虑其流动性。在这里,我们对单颗粒和双颗粒泥石流进行了水槽试验,并将结果与数值模拟结果进行了比较。我们使用直径为0.29和0.14 cm的砂粒,混合比例为1:1和3:7。用高速摄像机记录颗粒偏析。我们每隔0.5秒对泥石流前缘进行评估。在此基础上,对相同条件下的一维泥石流进行了数值模拟,并在模拟混合粒径时采用平均粒径。对于单颗粒泥石流,实验结果与模拟结果在流深、锋面速度和流量方面吻合较好。而对于双颗粒泥石流,模拟流深较小,锋面速度和通量均大于实验值。这些差异可能是由于主要剪切应力是由较低流层中较小泥沙颗粒的浓度引起的;在泥石流体中发现了这种逆级配。在这些条件下,大部分剪切应力由下层较小的颗粒支撑;与数值模拟中从前缘到流体平均直径逐渐减小的颗粒偏析相比,泥石流特征与单颗粒流相似。因此,计算出的前速度被低估了;双颗粒碎屑流前缘的颗粒偏析在最初或随着时间的推移对流动性没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Environmental & Engineering Geoscience Journal publishes peer-reviewed manuscripts that address issues relating to the interaction of people with hydrologic and geologic systems. Theoretical and applied contributions are appropriate, and the primary criteria for acceptance are scientific and technical merit.
期刊最新文献
Using an Inventory of Unstable Slopes to Prioritize Probabilistic Rockfall Modeling and Acid-Base Accounting in Great Smoky Mountains National Park Impact of global warming on average annual air temperature in Varaždin Modern technologies and methods of data collection in the function of making better traffic analysis of forensic traffic experts A strategic evaluation framework to measure and guide efforts to protect biodiversity Climate change, disaster risk reduction and resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1