The legacy of rebel order: local (in)security in Colombia

IF 1.1 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Conflict Security & Development Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI:10.1080/14678802.2021.1911065
Clara Voyvodic
{"title":"The legacy of rebel order: local (in)security in Colombia","authors":"Clara Voyvodic","doi":"10.1080/14678802.2021.1911065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the aftermath of a peace agreement, the demobilisation of armed combatants from the field of war is taken as an indication of improved security. However, in many contexts, the withdrawal of armed groups also represents the dismantling of informal sources of order for local communities. Drawing from work on rebel governance and the local turn in peace-building, I argue that rebel orders shape security experiences even after a rebel group demobilises. In Colombia, following demobilisation of the Armed Revolutionary Forces of Colombia (FARC), local communities framed their insecurity in the face of other armed groups – including government forces – by invoking features of order previously provided by the FARC. I introduce the concept of relational security indicators, building on Mac Ginty’s everyday peace indicators, to incorporate the influence of rebel order on subjective evaluations of security. Through an inductive qualitative approach in the Departments of Antioquia and Nariño, I identified two features of FARC order, protection and structure, that framed communities’ experience of insecurity in their absence. Communities had to address the dual legacies of rebel order and violence in order to make sense of the uncertainty they faced after the FARC’s demobilisaton. Work on rebel governance has largely excluded the legacy of rebel order post-demobilisation, while local peace-building studies rarely consider the experience of local communities through the lens of rebel order. The recent demobilisation of a long-standing example of ‘rebel ruler’ such as the FARC offers an insight into how communities invoke the legacy of rebel order to evaluate and understand their insecurity during conflict transitions.","PeriodicalId":46301,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Security & Development","volume":"47 1","pages":"177 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Security & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2021.1911065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the aftermath of a peace agreement, the demobilisation of armed combatants from the field of war is taken as an indication of improved security. However, in many contexts, the withdrawal of armed groups also represents the dismantling of informal sources of order for local communities. Drawing from work on rebel governance and the local turn in peace-building, I argue that rebel orders shape security experiences even after a rebel group demobilises. In Colombia, following demobilisation of the Armed Revolutionary Forces of Colombia (FARC), local communities framed their insecurity in the face of other armed groups – including government forces – by invoking features of order previously provided by the FARC. I introduce the concept of relational security indicators, building on Mac Ginty’s everyday peace indicators, to incorporate the influence of rebel order on subjective evaluations of security. Through an inductive qualitative approach in the Departments of Antioquia and Nariño, I identified two features of FARC order, protection and structure, that framed communities’ experience of insecurity in their absence. Communities had to address the dual legacies of rebel order and violence in order to make sense of the uncertainty they faced after the FARC’s demobilisaton. Work on rebel governance has largely excluded the legacy of rebel order post-demobilisation, while local peace-building studies rarely consider the experience of local communities through the lens of rebel order. The recent demobilisation of a long-standing example of ‘rebel ruler’ such as the FARC offers an insight into how communities invoke the legacy of rebel order to evaluate and understand their insecurity during conflict transitions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
叛军秩序的遗产:哥伦比亚的地方安全
在和平协议之后,武装战斗人员从战场复员被视为安全改善的迹象。然而,在许多情况下,武装团体的撤离也代表着地方社区非正式秩序来源的瓦解。根据对叛军治理和和平建设的地方转向的研究,我认为,即使在叛军组织遣散之后,叛军的命令也会影响安全经验。在哥伦比亚,哥伦比亚武装革命力量(FARC)遣散后,当地社区在面对包括政府军在内的其他武装团体时,通过援引FARC以前提供的秩序特征来构建他们的不安全感。我在麦金蒂的日常和平指标的基础上引入了关系安全指标的概念,将反叛秩序对安全主观评价的影响纳入其中。通过在安蒂奥基亚省和Nariño省的归纳定性方法,我确定了哥伦比亚革命武装力量秩序的两个特征,保护和结构,这两个特征构成了社区在他们缺席时的不安全体验。各社区必须解决反叛秩序和暴力的双重遗留问题,以便理解哥伦比亚革命武装力量遣散后他们面临的不确定性。关于叛军治理的工作在很大程度上排除了复员后叛军秩序的遗产,而当地建设和平的研究很少通过叛军秩序的视角考虑当地社区的经验。最近,哥伦比亚革命武装力量(FARC)等长期存在的“反叛统治者”的复员,让我们深入了解了社区如何利用反叛秩序的遗产来评估和理解他们在冲突过渡期间的不安全感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict Security & Development
Conflict Security & Development INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
From snapshots to panoramas: navigating power, space, and time in the study of armed groups Natural bedfellows: corruption, criminality and the failure of international reconstruction. A case study of the Kabul Bank Elites and arbitrary power: ethical challenges and guiding principles for research with violent political actors Transitional justice interventions in Sri Lanka: why do they keep failing? ‘This is the fate of Libyan women:’ contempt, ridicule, and indifference of Seham Sergiwa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1