Sunless and Indoor Tanning Among U.S. Non-Hispanic White Women Ages 18-49 Years.

Andrew B Seidenberg, Anne K Julian, Anne M Hartman, Dawn M Holman
{"title":"Sunless and Indoor Tanning Among U.S. Non-Hispanic White Women Ages 18-49 Years.","authors":"Andrew B Seidenberg, Anne K Julian, Anne M Hartman, Dawn M Holman","doi":"10.1097/jdn.0000000000000736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of indoor UV tanning devices (also known as \"indoor tanning\") has declined in recent years. Less is known about use of dihydroxyacetone-containing products used for tanning (also known as \"sunless tanning\"). We analyzed data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey. Analysis was limited to non-Hispanic White women ages 18-49 years. We estimated the proportion of women reporting spray tanning, self-applied lotion tanning, and indoor tanning and used weighted multivariable logistic regression models to examine the relationships between socio-demographic characteristics, skin cancer risk factors, and other cancer risk factors with sunless and indoor tanning. Overall, 17.7% of women reported sunless tanning. Lotion tanning was more common (15.3%) than spray tanning (6.8%), while 12.0% of women engaged in indoor tanning. Among sunless tanners, 23.7% also engaged in indoor tanning. Younger age, ever having a skin exam, skin reactions to the sun, binge drinking, and being at a healthy weight were associated with sunless tanning. While sunless tanning may be less harmful for skin cancer risk than indoor tanning, the frequency with which the two behaviors co-occur suggests that efforts to address societal pressures for women to alter their skin color may have important public health benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":17315,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Dermatology Nurses' Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10921983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Dermatology Nurses' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jdn.0000000000000736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of indoor UV tanning devices (also known as "indoor tanning") has declined in recent years. Less is known about use of dihydroxyacetone-containing products used for tanning (also known as "sunless tanning"). We analyzed data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey. Analysis was limited to non-Hispanic White women ages 18-49 years. We estimated the proportion of women reporting spray tanning, self-applied lotion tanning, and indoor tanning and used weighted multivariable logistic regression models to examine the relationships between socio-demographic characteristics, skin cancer risk factors, and other cancer risk factors with sunless and indoor tanning. Overall, 17.7% of women reported sunless tanning. Lotion tanning was more common (15.3%) than spray tanning (6.8%), while 12.0% of women engaged in indoor tanning. Among sunless tanners, 23.7% also engaged in indoor tanning. Younger age, ever having a skin exam, skin reactions to the sun, binge drinking, and being at a healthy weight were associated with sunless tanning. While sunless tanning may be less harmful for skin cancer risk than indoor tanning, the frequency with which the two behaviors co-occur suggests that efforts to address societal pressures for women to alter their skin color may have important public health benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国 18-49 岁非西班牙裔白人女性中的日光浴和室内日光浴。
近年来,室内紫外线美黑设备(又称 "室内美黑")的使用有所减少。人们对用于日光浴的含二羟基丙酮产品(又称 "日光浴")的使用情况知之甚少。我们分析了 2015 年全国健康访谈调查的数据。分析对象仅限于 18-49 岁的非西班牙裔白人女性。我们估算了报告喷雾美黑、自行涂抹乳液美黑和室内美黑的女性比例,并使用加权多变量逻辑回归模型研究了社会人口特征、皮肤癌风险因素和其他癌症风险因素与日光浴和室内美黑之间的关系。总体而言,有 17.7% 的妇女报告了日光浴。乳液晒黑(15.3%)比喷雾晒黑(6.8%)更常见,而从事室内晒黑的妇女占 12.0%。在不晒太阳的人中,23.7%的人也在室内晒黑。年龄较小、曾经做过皮肤检查、皮肤对阳光的反应、酗酒和体重健康与日光浴有关。虽然日光浴对皮肤癌风险的危害可能小于室内日光浴,但这两种行为同时出现的频率表明,努力消除女性改变肤色的社会压力可能会对公共健康产生重要的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Registration, Voting, and the Dermatology Nurse Skin Barrier Function of Black African and White Nursing Students Keratoacanthoma Treatment Options Your Voice, Your Vote—Your Superpower Awareness of Skin Cancer in the Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran Guilan Cohort Study Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1