{"title":"Detection of Liver Disorder Using RBF SVM in Comparison with Naïve Bayes to Measure the Accuracy, Precision, Sensitivity and Specificity","authors":"M. Madhu, Dr.Kirupa Ganapathy","doi":"10.47059/alinteri/v36i1/ajas21093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Machine learning techniques are rapidly used in the area of medical research due to its impressive results in diagnosis and prediction of diseases. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of SVM classifier in identification of liver disorder by comparing it with Naive Bayes algorithm. Methods and Materials: A total of 31619 samples are collected from three liver disease datasets available in kaggle. These samples are divided into training dataset (n = 22133 [70%]) and test dataset (n = 9486 [30%]). Accuracy, precision, specificity and sensitivity values are calculated to quantify the performance of the SVM algorithm. Results: SVM achieved accuracy, precision, sensitivity and specificity of 73.64%, 97.82%, 97.56% and 69.77% respectively compared to 57.31%, 41.39%, 94.87% and 37.20% by Naive Bayes algorithm. Conclusion: In this study it is found that the RBF SVM algorithm performed better than the Naive Bayes algorithm in liver disorder detection of the datasets considered.","PeriodicalId":42396,"journal":{"name":"Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47059/alinteri/v36i1/ajas21093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Machine learning techniques are rapidly used in the area of medical research due to its impressive results in diagnosis and prediction of diseases. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of SVM classifier in identification of liver disorder by comparing it with Naive Bayes algorithm. Methods and Materials: A total of 31619 samples are collected from three liver disease datasets available in kaggle. These samples are divided into training dataset (n = 22133 [70%]) and test dataset (n = 9486 [30%]). Accuracy, precision, specificity and sensitivity values are calculated to quantify the performance of the SVM algorithm. Results: SVM achieved accuracy, precision, sensitivity and specificity of 73.64%, 97.82%, 97.56% and 69.77% respectively compared to 57.31%, 41.39%, 94.87% and 37.20% by Naive Bayes algorithm. Conclusion: In this study it is found that the RBF SVM algorithm performed better than the Naive Bayes algorithm in liver disorder detection of the datasets considered.