DO BANKS GAME ON DYNAMIC PROVISIONING?

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.1142/S2591768418500022
S. Carbó-Valverde, Francisco Rodríguez-Fernández
{"title":"DO BANKS GAME ON DYNAMIC PROVISIONING?","authors":"S. Carbó-Valverde, Francisco Rodríguez-Fernández","doi":"10.1142/S2591768418500022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reducing credit procyclicality represents one of the key challenges on the regulatory agenda to reform the financial system architecture. Some early experiences may provide some insights on how countercyclical regulations may be effective. The Spanish dynamic provisions scheme implemented in 2000 is one of the main reference points in this context. We analyze the effects of dynamic provisions on managerial accounting discretion and ex-ante risk-taking behavior by banks. We empirically examine a sample of Spanish banks using quarterly information from 1995Q1 to 2013Q4. Our findings suggest that the counter-cyclicality of provisions has been reduced over time, as it has also been the case of managerial discretion (income smoothing and profit signaling). However, the results suggest that banks game on dynamic provisions by taking an ex-ante riskier behavior once the dynamic provisioning scheme is adopted.","PeriodicalId":34440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2591768418500022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Reducing credit procyclicality represents one of the key challenges on the regulatory agenda to reform the financial system architecture. Some early experiences may provide some insights on how countercyclical regulations may be effective. The Spanish dynamic provisions scheme implemented in 2000 is one of the main reference points in this context. We analyze the effects of dynamic provisions on managerial accounting discretion and ex-ante risk-taking behavior by banks. We empirically examine a sample of Spanish banks using quarterly information from 1995Q1 to 2013Q4. Our findings suggest that the counter-cyclicality of provisions has been reduced over time, as it has also been the case of managerial discretion (income smoothing and profit signaling). However, the results suggest that banks game on dynamic provisions by taking an ex-ante riskier behavior once the dynamic provisioning scheme is adopted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银行会在动态准备金上做文章吗?
减少信贷顺周期性是改革金融体系架构的监管议程上的关键挑战之一。一些早期的经验可能会提供一些关于反周期监管如何有效的见解。2000年实施的西班牙动态条款计划是这方面的主要参考点之一。分析了动态拨备对管理会计自由裁量权和银行事前风险承担行为的影响。我们使用1995年第一季度至2013年第四季度的季度信息对西班牙银行样本进行了实证研究。我们的研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,准备金的反周期性已经减少,因为它也是管理自由裁量权(收入平滑和利润信号)的情况。然而,研究结果表明,一旦采用动态拨备方案,银行将采取事前风险行为进行动态拨备博弈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions
Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions Economics, Econometrics and Finance-General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysing banks' performance during the recent breakdowns. Which were its main drivers? Sustainability Reporting: Evidence From Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) Risk Mapping as a Form of Banking Immunity Response to Covid-19 Pandemic Green Finance: past, present and future studies The Impact of SFAS166/167 on Bank Liquidity and Lending
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1