Expected Complexity of Routing in $\Theta_6$ and Half-$\Theta_6$ Graphs

P. Bose, J. Carufel, O. Devillers
{"title":"Expected Complexity of Routing in $\\Theta_6$ and Half-$\\Theta_6$ Graphs","authors":"P. Bose, J. Carufel, O. Devillers","doi":"10.20382/JOCG.V11I1A9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study online routing algorithms on the $\\Theta$6-graph and the half-$\\Theta$6-graph (which is equivalent to a variant of the Delaunay triangulation). Given a source vertex s and a target vertex t in the $\\Theta$6-graph (resp. half-$\\Theta$6-graph), there exists a deterministic online routing algorithm that finds a path from s to t whose length is at most 2 st (resp. 2.89 st) which is optimal in the worst case [Bose et al., siam J. on Computing, 44(6)]. We propose alternative, slightly simpler routing algorithms that are optimal in the worst case and for which we provide an analysis of the average routing ratio for the $\\Theta$6-graph and half-$\\Theta$6-graph defined on a Poisson point process. For the $\\Theta$6-graph, our online routing algorithm has an expected routing ratio of 1.161 (when s and t random) and a maximum expected routing ratio of 1.22 (maximum for fixed s and t where all other points are random), much better than the worst-case routing ratio of 2. For the half-$\\Theta$6-graph, our memoryless online routing algorithm has an expected routing ratio of 1.43 and a maximum expected routing ratio of 1.58. Our online routing algorithm that uses a constant amount of additional memory has an expected routing ratio of 1.34 and a maximum expected routing ratio of 1.40. The additional memory is only used to remember the coordinates of the starting point of the route. Both of these algorithms have an expected routing ratio that is much better than their worst-case routing ratio of 2.89.","PeriodicalId":54969,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications","volume":"48 1","pages":"212-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20382/JOCG.V11I1A9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We study online routing algorithms on the $\Theta$6-graph and the half-$\Theta$6-graph (which is equivalent to a variant of the Delaunay triangulation). Given a source vertex s and a target vertex t in the $\Theta$6-graph (resp. half-$\Theta$6-graph), there exists a deterministic online routing algorithm that finds a path from s to t whose length is at most 2 st (resp. 2.89 st) which is optimal in the worst case [Bose et al., siam J. on Computing, 44(6)]. We propose alternative, slightly simpler routing algorithms that are optimal in the worst case and for which we provide an analysis of the average routing ratio for the $\Theta$6-graph and half-$\Theta$6-graph defined on a Poisson point process. For the $\Theta$6-graph, our online routing algorithm has an expected routing ratio of 1.161 (when s and t random) and a maximum expected routing ratio of 1.22 (maximum for fixed s and t where all other points are random), much better than the worst-case routing ratio of 2. For the half-$\Theta$6-graph, our memoryless online routing algorithm has an expected routing ratio of 1.43 and a maximum expected routing ratio of 1.58. Our online routing algorithm that uses a constant amount of additional memory has an expected routing ratio of 1.34 and a maximum expected routing ratio of 1.40. The additional memory is only used to remember the coordinates of the starting point of the route. Both of these algorithms have an expected routing ratio that is much better than their worst-case routing ratio of 2.89.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
$\Theta_6$和半$\Theta_6$图中路由的期望复杂度
我们研究了$\Theta$6图和半$\Theta$6图(相当于Delaunay三角测量的一个变体)上的在线路由算法。给定$\Theta$6图中的源顶点s和目标顶点t。half-$\Theta$6-graph),则存在一种确定性在线路由算法,该算法可以找到从s到t的路径,其长度最多为2st (resp。2.89 st)在最坏的情况下是最优的[Bose等人,siam J. on Computing, 44(6)]。我们提出了一种替代的,稍微简单的路由算法,在最坏的情况下是最优的,为此我们提供了在泊松点过程上定义的$\Theta$6图和半$\Theta$6图的平均路由比率的分析。对于$\Theta$6图,我们的在线路由算法的期望路由比为1.161(当s和t是随机的),最大期望路由比为1.22(对于固定的s和t,所有其他点都是随机的,最大期望路由比为2),比最坏情况下的路由比要好得多。对于half-$\Theta$6图,我们的无内存在线路由算法的期望路由比为1.43,最大期望路由比为1.58。我们的在线路由算法使用恒定数量的额外内存,其期望路由比为1.34,最大期望路由比为1.40。额外的内存只用于记住路线起点的坐标。这两种算法的期望路由比都比它们的最坏情况路由比2.89要好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications (IJCGA) is a quarterly journal devoted to the field of computational geometry within the framework of design and analysis of algorithms. Emphasis is placed on the computational aspects of geometric problems that arise in various fields of science and engineering including computer-aided geometry design (CAGD), computer graphics, constructive solid geometry (CSG), operations research, pattern recognition, robotics, solid modelling, VLSI routing/layout, and others. Research contributions ranging from theoretical results in algorithm design — sequential or parallel, probabilistic or randomized algorithms — to applications in the above-mentioned areas are welcome. Research findings or experiences in the implementations of geometric algorithms, such as numerical stability, and papers with a geometric flavour related to algorithms or the application areas of computational geometry are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
On morphs of 1-plane graphs A Geometric Approach to Inelastic Collapse Near-optimal algorithms for point-line fitting problems Algorithms for approximate sparse regression and nearest induced hulls Recognizing weighted and seeded disk graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1