How do we trade off benefits and harms of anticancer drugs for advanced cancer patients?

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of The Korean Medical Association Pub Date : 2023-02-10 DOI:10.5124/jkma.2023.66.2.86
D. Y. Kim
{"title":"How do we trade off benefits and harms of anticancer drugs for advanced cancer patients?","authors":"D. Y. Kim","doi":"10.5124/jkma.2023.66.2.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The overall survival rate of advanced cancer patients has improved thanks to the development of modern medical treatments, particularly new and innovative chemotherapeutic agents such as targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.Current Concepts: Chemotherapy is administered in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative settings, and its ultimate goal is to improve overall survival. Chemotherapy has several proven and valuable clinical benefits, but also many side effects that cannot be ignored, especially in patients with poor European Cancer Oncology Group performance status. Therefore, we must carefully weigh and trade off the benefits and harms from many chemotherapy agents. In fact, it can be difficult to determine whether advanced cancer patients really benefit from chemotherapy, which is why a number of value measurement tools such as the American Society Clinical Oncology-Value Framework and the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale have been developed.Discussion and Conclusion: We need to include individual cancer patients in decision-making processes and use appropriate shared decision-making to decide whether or not to administer chemotherapy. Furthermore, we should perform rational trade-offs in consideration of limited health resources.","PeriodicalId":17300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Medical Association","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2023.66.2.86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The overall survival rate of advanced cancer patients has improved thanks to the development of modern medical treatments, particularly new and innovative chemotherapeutic agents such as targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.Current Concepts: Chemotherapy is administered in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative settings, and its ultimate goal is to improve overall survival. Chemotherapy has several proven and valuable clinical benefits, but also many side effects that cannot be ignored, especially in patients with poor European Cancer Oncology Group performance status. Therefore, we must carefully weigh and trade off the benefits and harms from many chemotherapy agents. In fact, it can be difficult to determine whether advanced cancer patients really benefit from chemotherapy, which is why a number of value measurement tools such as the American Society Clinical Oncology-Value Framework and the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale have been developed.Discussion and Conclusion: We need to include individual cancer patients in decision-making processes and use appropriate shared decision-making to decide whether or not to administer chemotherapy. Furthermore, we should perform rational trade-offs in consideration of limited health resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们如何权衡抗癌药物对晚期癌症患者的利弊?
背景:由于现代医学治疗的发展,特别是新的和创新的化疗药物,如靶向治疗和免疫检查点抑制剂,晚期癌症患者的总生存率得到了提高。当前概念:化疗在新辅助、辅助和姑息环境下进行,其最终目标是提高总生存率。化疗有几个已被证实的有价值的临床益处,但也有许多不可忽视的副作用,特别是在欧洲肿瘤肿瘤组表现状态较差的患者中。因此,我们必须仔细权衡各种化疗药物的利弊。事实上,很难确定晚期癌症患者是否真的从化疗中受益,这就是为什么一些价值衡量工具,如美国临床肿瘤学会-价值框架和欧洲肿瘤医学学会-临床获益等级量表已经被开发出来。讨论与结论:我们需要将个别癌症患者纳入决策过程,并采用适当的共同决策来决定是否给予化疗。此外,考虑到有限的卫生资源,我们应该进行合理的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of The Korean Medical Association
Journal of The Korean Medical Association Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Korean Medical Association (JKMA) is the official peer-reviewed, open-access, monthly journal of the Korean Medical Association (KMA). It contains articles in Korean or English. Its abbreviated title is ''J Korean Med Assoc''. The aims of the Journal include contributing to the treatment of and preventing diseases of public health importance and to improvement of health and quality of life through sharing the state-of the-art scientific information on medicine by the members of KMA and other national and international societies.
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus complex pulmonary disease Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of scabies Current status of scabies in Korea Principles for effective management of scabies outbreaks Problems and improvements in the Medical Law’s excessive regulation of physicians in Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1