Performance evaluation of GPM IMERG precipitation products over the tropical oceans using Buoys

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Journal of Hydrometeorology Pub Date : 2023-07-27 DOI:10.1175/jhm-d-22-0216.1
R. Pradhan, Y. Markonis
{"title":"Performance evaluation of GPM IMERG precipitation products over the tropical oceans using Buoys","authors":"R. Pradhan, Y. Markonis","doi":"10.1175/jhm-d-22-0216.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe major fraction of the global precipitation falls in tropical oceans. Nonetheless, due to the lack of in-situ precipitation measurements, the number of studies over the tropical oceans remains limited. Similarly, the performance of IMERG products over the tropical oceans, is yet to be known. In this context, this study quantitatively evaluates the 20 years (2001 – 2020) of IMERG V06 Early, Late, and Final products against the in-situ buoys estimates using the pixel-point approach at a daily scale across the tropical oceans. Results show that IMERG represents well the mean spatial pattern and spatial variation of precipitation, though significant differences exist in the magnitude of precipitation amount. Overall, IMERG notably overestimates precipitation across the tropical ocean, with maxima over the West Pacific and Indian oceans, while it performs better over the East Pacific and Atlantic oceans. Moreover, irrespective of the region, IMERG sufficiently detects precipitation events (i.e., > 0.1 mm/day) for high-precipitation regions, though it significantly overestimates the magnitude. Despite IMERG’s detection issues of precipitation events over the regions with lower precipitation, it depicts good agreement with the buoys in total precipitation estimation. The positive hit bias and false alarm bias are the major contributions to the overall total positive bias. Furthermore, the detection capability of IMERG tends to decline with increasing precipitation rates. In terms of IMERG runs, IMERG-F shows slightly better performance than the −E, −L runs. More detailed studies over the tropical oceans are required to better characterize the biases and their sources.","PeriodicalId":15962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","volume":"394 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-22-0216.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The major fraction of the global precipitation falls in tropical oceans. Nonetheless, due to the lack of in-situ precipitation measurements, the number of studies over the tropical oceans remains limited. Similarly, the performance of IMERG products over the tropical oceans, is yet to be known. In this context, this study quantitatively evaluates the 20 years (2001 – 2020) of IMERG V06 Early, Late, and Final products against the in-situ buoys estimates using the pixel-point approach at a daily scale across the tropical oceans. Results show that IMERG represents well the mean spatial pattern and spatial variation of precipitation, though significant differences exist in the magnitude of precipitation amount. Overall, IMERG notably overestimates precipitation across the tropical ocean, with maxima over the West Pacific and Indian oceans, while it performs better over the East Pacific and Atlantic oceans. Moreover, irrespective of the region, IMERG sufficiently detects precipitation events (i.e., > 0.1 mm/day) for high-precipitation regions, though it significantly overestimates the magnitude. Despite IMERG’s detection issues of precipitation events over the regions with lower precipitation, it depicts good agreement with the buoys in total precipitation estimation. The positive hit bias and false alarm bias are the major contributions to the overall total positive bias. Furthermore, the detection capability of IMERG tends to decline with increasing precipitation rates. In terms of IMERG runs, IMERG-F shows slightly better performance than the −E, −L runs. More detailed studies over the tropical oceans are required to better characterize the biases and their sources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用浮标对热带海洋GPM IMERG降水产品进行性能评价
全球降水的主要部分落在热带海洋。然而,由于缺乏现场降水测量,对热带海洋的研究数量仍然有限。同样,IMERG产品在热带海洋上空的性能也尚不清楚。在此背景下,本研究利用像素点法在热带海洋逐日尺度上对IMERG V06早期、晚期和最终产品的20年(2001 - 2020)进行了定量评估。结果表明,IMERG较好地反映了降水的平均空间格局和空间变异,但降水量大小存在显著差异。总体而言,IMERG明显高估了整个热带海洋的降水,其中西太平洋和印度洋的降水最大,而东太平洋和大西洋的降水表现较好。此外,无论在哪个地区,IMERG都能充分探测到高降水地区的降水事件(即100 - 0.1毫米/天),尽管它明显高估了降水的量级。尽管IMERG在降水较少的地区存在降水事件的检测问题,但它与浮标在总降水估算中的一致性较好。正命中偏差和虚警偏差是总体正偏差的主要贡献。随着降水率的增加,IMERG的探测能力呈下降趋势。在IMERG运行方面,IMERG- f的性能略好于−E、−L运行。需要对热带海洋进行更详细的研究,以便更好地描述这些偏差及其来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrometeorology
Journal of Hydrometeorology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrometeorology (JHM) (ISSN: 1525-755X; eISSN: 1525-7541) publishes research on modeling, observing, and forecasting processes related to fluxes and storage of water and energy, including interactions with the boundary layer and lower atmosphere, and processes related to precipitation, radiation, and other meteorological inputs.
期刊最新文献
Patterns and trend analysis of rain-on-snow events using passive microwave satellite data over the Canadian Arctic Archipelago since 1987 Enforcing Water Balance in Multitask Deep Learning Models for Hydrological Forecasting Upper Colorado River streamflow dependencies on summertime synoptic circulations and hydroclimate variability Analysis of drought characteristics and causes in Yunnan Province in the last 60 years (1961-2020) A machine learning approach to model over ocean tropical cyclone precipitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1