Discriminatory Power Analysis: An Exemplar Investigation

Julie V. Marinac, Michael Antonio
{"title":"Discriminatory Power Analysis: An Exemplar Investigation","authors":"Julie V. Marinac, Michael Antonio","doi":"10.1179/136132810805335128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aims: This study examined the importance of reporting discriminatory power analysis when determining the validity of using standardized assessment tools with extrapolated normative data for secondary school students. Methods: The participants were 80 secondary school-aged students, selected based on typically developing phonological awareness and literacy skills. The Queensland University Inventory of Literacy (QUIL; Dodd, Holm, Oerlemans, & McCormick, 1996), a formal test of phonological awareness skills for students in years 1 to 7, was used as an exemplar test. Raw scores were obtained for each subtest prior to discriminatory power and normal distribution analyses. Results: When the raw scores were converted to standard scores and percentile ranks the results appeared to provide clinically applicable data. The discriminatory power analysis, however, determined that only 3 of the 10 subtests met sensitivity standards (i.e., were normally distributed). Conclusion: This suggests that discriminatory power, in addition to validity and reliability should be reported to allow informed use of standardized assessment tools.","PeriodicalId":88385,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of speech, language, and hearing","volume":"29 1","pages":"121 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of speech, language, and hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/136132810805335128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Aims: This study examined the importance of reporting discriminatory power analysis when determining the validity of using standardized assessment tools with extrapolated normative data for secondary school students. Methods: The participants were 80 secondary school-aged students, selected based on typically developing phonological awareness and literacy skills. The Queensland University Inventory of Literacy (QUIL; Dodd, Holm, Oerlemans, & McCormick, 1996), a formal test of phonological awareness skills for students in years 1 to 7, was used as an exemplar test. Raw scores were obtained for each subtest prior to discriminatory power and normal distribution analyses. Results: When the raw scores were converted to standard scores and percentile ranks the results appeared to provide clinically applicable data. The discriminatory power analysis, however, determined that only 3 of the 10 subtests met sensitivity standards (i.e., were normally distributed). Conclusion: This suggests that discriminatory power, in addition to validity and reliability should be reported to allow informed use of standardized assessment tools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
歧视权力分析:一个范例调查
摘要目的:本研究考察了报告歧视性权力分析在确定使用标准化评估工具和外推规范数据对中学生的有效性时的重要性。方法:参与者为80名中学生,根据典型的发展语音意识和读写技能进行选择。昆士兰大学识字量表(QUIL);Dodd, Holm, Oerlemans, & McCormick, 1996)是一项针对1至7年级学生的语音意识技能的正式测试,被用作范例测试。在歧视权和正态分布分析之前,获得每个子测试的原始分数。结果:当原始评分转换为标准评分和百分位排名时,结果似乎提供了临床应用的数据。然而,歧视性功效分析确定,10个子测试中只有3个子测试符合敏感性标准(即正态分布)。结论:这表明除了效度和信度外,还应报告歧视性权力,以便对标准化评估工具进行知情使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Presence of Stop Bursts and Multiple Bursts in Younger and Older Adults Effects of Memory Aids on the Conversations of Elderly Chinese Persons Subject Index: Volume 15, Numbers 1–4 Explicit Phonological Knowledge of Educational Professionals Author Index: Volume 15, Numbers 1–4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1