{"title":"Discriminatory Power Analysis: An Exemplar Investigation","authors":"Julie V. Marinac, Michael Antonio","doi":"10.1179/136132810805335128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aims: This study examined the importance of reporting discriminatory power analysis when determining the validity of using standardized assessment tools with extrapolated normative data for secondary school students. Methods: The participants were 80 secondary school-aged students, selected based on typically developing phonological awareness and literacy skills. The Queensland University Inventory of Literacy (QUIL; Dodd, Holm, Oerlemans, & McCormick, 1996), a formal test of phonological awareness skills for students in years 1 to 7, was used as an exemplar test. Raw scores were obtained for each subtest prior to discriminatory power and normal distribution analyses. Results: When the raw scores were converted to standard scores and percentile ranks the results appeared to provide clinically applicable data. The discriminatory power analysis, however, determined that only 3 of the 10 subtests met sensitivity standards (i.e., were normally distributed). Conclusion: This suggests that discriminatory power, in addition to validity and reliability should be reported to allow informed use of standardized assessment tools.","PeriodicalId":88385,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of speech, language, and hearing","volume":"29 1","pages":"121 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of speech, language, and hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/136132810805335128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Aims: This study examined the importance of reporting discriminatory power analysis when determining the validity of using standardized assessment tools with extrapolated normative data for secondary school students. Methods: The participants were 80 secondary school-aged students, selected based on typically developing phonological awareness and literacy skills. The Queensland University Inventory of Literacy (QUIL; Dodd, Holm, Oerlemans, & McCormick, 1996), a formal test of phonological awareness skills for students in years 1 to 7, was used as an exemplar test. Raw scores were obtained for each subtest prior to discriminatory power and normal distribution analyses. Results: When the raw scores were converted to standard scores and percentile ranks the results appeared to provide clinically applicable data. The discriminatory power analysis, however, determined that only 3 of the 10 subtests met sensitivity standards (i.e., were normally distributed). Conclusion: This suggests that discriminatory power, in addition to validity and reliability should be reported to allow informed use of standardized assessment tools.