Proximate and Mineral Composition of Some Foreign and Local Rice Varieties Sold in Mile 3 Market, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

W. Nda-Wonodi, B. G. Ibiama, B. Agubolom, T. Ologbon
{"title":"Proximate and Mineral Composition of Some Foreign and Local Rice Varieties Sold in Mile 3 Market, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria","authors":"W. Nda-Wonodi, B. G. Ibiama, B. Agubolom, T. Ologbon","doi":"10.9734/ejnfs/2023/v15i51306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rice is a staple food in many countries of Africa and it is nutritionally beneficial. This research work compared the proximate composition and mineral composition of some local and foreign rice varieties. Four varieties of rice were analyzed; two types of local rice designated as (L1 and L2) and two types of foreign rice (F1 and F2). The proximate composition such as moisture content, ash content, carbohydrate content, crude protein, crude fiber and total fat were evaluated using standard methods.  The result of the analysis showed that the moisture content was lowest in L1 (8.56 ± 0.26g) and highest in sample L2 (9.47 ± 0.48g).  All the four varieties recorded high carbohydrate content. The fat content of L1 and L2 (1.19±0.20 - 2.48±0.90) were significantly higher (p<0.05) when compared to F1 and F2 (1.69±0.30 – 1.99± 0.20a). Crude fiber content for L1 and L2 (1.49±0.09 -1.69±0.09) were statistically higher compared to F1 and F2 (0.29±0.09b -0.39±0.01b). Crude protein for L1 and L2 (7.89±0.09 – 8.09±0.22) were significantly higher when compared to F1 and F2 (6.34± 0.22b – 7.22± 0.66). Ash content for L1 and L2 (0.60± 0.01-0.68±0.32) were statistically   lower compared to F1 and F2 (0.62±0.08 – 1.20± 0.20) Potassium and Zinc showed no significant difference in all samples apart from F1 where Potassium and Zinc were significantly different. Calcium values for foreign rice showed significant difference when compared to the values for local rice. Local rice appeared to have a relatively higher level of iron when compared to all the foreign rice samples. The values obtained from this study indicates that Nigerian local rice varieties are nutritionally better compared to foreign rice varieties. ","PeriodicalId":11922,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition &amp; Food Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition &amp; Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2023/v15i51306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rice is a staple food in many countries of Africa and it is nutritionally beneficial. This research work compared the proximate composition and mineral composition of some local and foreign rice varieties. Four varieties of rice were analyzed; two types of local rice designated as (L1 and L2) and two types of foreign rice (F1 and F2). The proximate composition such as moisture content, ash content, carbohydrate content, crude protein, crude fiber and total fat were evaluated using standard methods.  The result of the analysis showed that the moisture content was lowest in L1 (8.56 ± 0.26g) and highest in sample L2 (9.47 ± 0.48g).  All the four varieties recorded high carbohydrate content. The fat content of L1 and L2 (1.19±0.20 - 2.48±0.90) were significantly higher (p<0.05) when compared to F1 and F2 (1.69±0.30 – 1.99± 0.20a). Crude fiber content for L1 and L2 (1.49±0.09 -1.69±0.09) were statistically higher compared to F1 and F2 (0.29±0.09b -0.39±0.01b). Crude protein for L1 and L2 (7.89±0.09 – 8.09±0.22) were significantly higher when compared to F1 and F2 (6.34± 0.22b – 7.22± 0.66). Ash content for L1 and L2 (0.60± 0.01-0.68±0.32) were statistically   lower compared to F1 and F2 (0.62±0.08 – 1.20± 0.20) Potassium and Zinc showed no significant difference in all samples apart from F1 where Potassium and Zinc were significantly different. Calcium values for foreign rice showed significant difference when compared to the values for local rice. Local rice appeared to have a relatively higher level of iron when compared to all the foreign rice samples. The values obtained from this study indicates that Nigerian local rice varieties are nutritionally better compared to foreign rice varieties. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在尼日利亚河流州哈科特港Mile 3市场上出售的一些外国和当地水稻品种的比邻物和矿物成分
大米是非洲许多国家的主食,营养丰富。本研究比较了一些本地和国外水稻品种的近似成分和矿物成分。分析了4个水稻品种;两种本地水稻(L1和L2)和两种外来水稻(F1和F2)。水分、灰分、碳水化合物、粗蛋白质、粗纤维和总脂肪等近似成分采用标准方法进行评价。分析结果表明,样品L1的含水率最低(8.56±0.26g),样品L2的含水率最高(9.47±0.48g)。4个品种的碳水化合物含量均较高。L1和L2脂肪含量(1.19±0.20 ~ 2.48±0.90)显著高于F1和F2(1.69±0.30 ~ 1.99±0.20a) (p<0.05)。L1和L2粗纤维含量(1.49±0.09 ~ 1.69±0.09)高于F1和F2(0.29±0.09b ~ 0.39±0.01b)。L1和L2粗蛋白质(7.89±0.09 ~ 8.09±0.22)显著高于F1和F2(6.34±0.22b ~ 7.22±0.66)。L1和L2的灰分含量(0.60±0.01 ~ 0.68±0.32)低于F1和F2(0.62±0.08 ~ 1.20±0.20)。除F1中钾和锌含量差异显著外,其余样品中钾和锌含量差异不显著。与本地稻米相比,外来稻米的钙值有显著差异。与所有外国大米样本相比,本地大米的铁含量似乎相对较高。本研究得出的数值表明,尼日利亚本地水稻品种的营养价值优于外国水稻品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Probiotic Attributes of Isolated Yeast Strains from Fruits and Bread Awareness about Nutritional Benefits of Millets among Young Adults of Ayodhya District, India Optimizing Process Conditions for Ghewar Development Using Response Surface Methodology Qualitative Assessment of Flours from Five Varieties of Yam in Benue State Nigeria Awareness about Government Scheme of Maternal Nutrition among Urban Area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1