{"title":"Evaluation of transdermal exposure of phthalates in children’s products","authors":"Jihye Hwang, Young-Wook Lim, Ji-Yeon Yang, Dong-chun Shin","doi":"10.5620/eaht.2022005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, 16 children’s products with the highest detection potential of phthalates were selected, and a phthalate assay and transdermal delivery analysis (NIER, US EPA Wipe [stress condition], US EPA Wipe [physiological condition], and US EPA Hand Wipe) were conducted with these products. The content of 6 controlled phthalates (DBP, BBP, DEHP, DNOP, DINP, and DIDP) was measured and most products contained more phthalates than the regulated guidelines (a total content of 6 phthalates to be ≤0.1%). For transdermal delivery, all items were found to be lower in the NIER transdermal delivery test method compared to the US EPA Hand Wipe (stress condition and physiological condition) transdermal delivery test method. For the US EPA Hand Wipe (stress condition and physiological condition) transdermal delivery test method, a similar result was observed, except for DINP. The average daily dose (ADD) estimated by determining the exposure algorithm for each transdermal delivery test method was highest in mats with a large contacting surface area and a long exposure time in the respective test methods. Conclusively, there was a difference between the NIER transdermal delivery test method and the US EPA Wipe transdermal delivery test method.","PeriodicalId":101307,"journal":{"name":"Environmental analysis, health and toxicology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental analysis, health and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5620/eaht.2022005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, 16 children’s products with the highest detection potential of phthalates were selected, and a phthalate assay and transdermal delivery analysis (NIER, US EPA Wipe [stress condition], US EPA Wipe [physiological condition], and US EPA Hand Wipe) were conducted with these products. The content of 6 controlled phthalates (DBP, BBP, DEHP, DNOP, DINP, and DIDP) was measured and most products contained more phthalates than the regulated guidelines (a total content of 6 phthalates to be ≤0.1%). For transdermal delivery, all items were found to be lower in the NIER transdermal delivery test method compared to the US EPA Hand Wipe (stress condition and physiological condition) transdermal delivery test method. For the US EPA Hand Wipe (stress condition and physiological condition) transdermal delivery test method, a similar result was observed, except for DINP. The average daily dose (ADD) estimated by determining the exposure algorithm for each transdermal delivery test method was highest in mats with a large contacting surface area and a long exposure time in the respective test methods. Conclusively, there was a difference between the NIER transdermal delivery test method and the US EPA Wipe transdermal delivery test method.
本研究选取了16种邻苯二甲酸盐检测潜力最高的儿童产品,对这些产品进行邻苯二甲酸盐测定和透皮给药分析(NIER、US EPA Wipe[应激状态]、US EPA Wipe[生理状态]和US EPA Hand Wipe)。测定了6种受控邻苯二甲酸酯(DBP、BBP、DEHP、DNOP、DINP和DIDP)的含量,大多数产品的邻苯二甲酸酯含量超过了规定的标准(6种邻苯二甲酸酯的总含量≤0.1%)。对于透皮给药,与美国EPA Hand Wipe(应激状态和生理状态)透皮给药测试方法相比,NIER透皮给药测试方法中所有项目都较低。对于美国EPA Hand Wipe(应激状态和生理状态)透皮给药试验方法,除了DINP外,观察到类似的结果。通过确定每种透皮给药试验方法的暴露算法估计的平均日剂量(ADD)在各自试验方法中接触表面积大、暴露时间长的垫子中最高。最后,NIER透皮给药试验方法与美国EPA Wipe透皮给药试验方法存在差异。