{"title":"Comparison of the Accuracy of Computerized Videokeratography and Keratometry for Use in the SRK II Formula for Lens Calculations","authors":"R.J. Antcliff , J. Bell , D.W. Flanagan","doi":"10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80421-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>OBJECTIVE: Accuracy comparison of computerized videokeratopraphy and keratometry for use in the SRK II formula for lens calculations. STUDY DESIGN: Preoperative biometry on 46 eyes undergoing phacoemulsification using either the keratometric equivalent derived from the Eyesys Corneal Analysis System™ (ECAS) or standard keratometry. The SRK II formula was used for the lens calculations. The patients were refracted 3 months postoperatively and the difference between the predicted refraction and the actual refraction was determined. RESULTS: Use of the ECAS resulted in smaller mean errors, but not to a significant degree. The ECAS however, produced a significantly greater proportion of actual refractions within 0.5 D of the predicted refraction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100500,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","volume":"7 5","pages":"Pages 288-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80421-2","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955368113804212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Accuracy comparison of computerized videokeratopraphy and keratometry for use in the SRK II formula for lens calculations. STUDY DESIGN: Preoperative biometry on 46 eyes undergoing phacoemulsification using either the keratometric equivalent derived from the Eyesys Corneal Analysis System™ (ECAS) or standard keratometry. The SRK II formula was used for the lens calculations. The patients were refracted 3 months postoperatively and the difference between the predicted refraction and the actual refraction was determined. RESULTS: Use of the ECAS resulted in smaller mean errors, but not to a significant degree. The ECAS however, produced a significantly greater proportion of actual refractions within 0.5 D of the predicted refraction.