Short-term effectiveness of metabolic surgery in nonobese diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

W. Salgado, Eduardo Bastos, Anna Dantas, Tiago Onzi, Lyz Silva, Á. Albano, Márcio Cortez, Luca Tristão, Clara dos Santos, Wanderley Bernardo
{"title":"Short-term effectiveness of metabolic surgery in nonobese diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"W. Salgado, Eduardo Bastos, Anna Dantas, Tiago Onzi, Lyz Silva, Á. Albano, Márcio Cortez, Luca Tristão, Clara dos Santos, Wanderley Bernardo","doi":"10.4103/jbs.jbs_6_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and short-term effectiveness of metabolic surgery (MS) in nonobese diabetic patients. Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was used in this systematic review. The search for evidence was performed in the Medline (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL), LILACS, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from the inception to February 2023. The main eligibility criteria were nonobese adults (body mass index [BMI] <30 kg/m2) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) undergoing MS. T2DM remission rate, glycemic parameters, and weight loss were measured before and after surgery. Complication rate was also described. Outcomes were aggregated and the quality of evidence was sorted. Heterogeneity was assumed when I2 >50%. The random-effects model was used to perform a proportional meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-one studies were included (n = 835). The overall rate of diabetes remission was 50.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 43.8%–56.1%; P = 0.993; I2 = 92%). The mean reduction of glycated hemoglobin and fasting glucose was 2.42% (95% CI = 1.91%–2.93%; P < 0.00001; I2 = 89%) and 70.60 mg/dL, respectively. A drop of 3.34 points (95% CI = 1.59–5.09; P < 0.0002; I2 = 95%) was observed in the HOMA-IR, and the mean postprandial glycemia was 123.27 mg/dL. No marked weight loss was observed (−3.80 kg/m2 in BMI; 95% CI = 2.70–4.91; P < 0.00001; I2 = 95%). There was no postoperative mortality, and the overall postoperative complication rate was about 12%. The certainty of evidence was low or very low. Conclusion: MS could be effective in the surgical approach of nonobese diabetic patients, but further long-term, more robust studies are needed to strengthen the evidence.","PeriodicalId":73828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jbs.jbs_6_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and short-term effectiveness of metabolic surgery (MS) in nonobese diabetic patients. Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was used in this systematic review. The search for evidence was performed in the Medline (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL), LILACS, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from the inception to February 2023. The main eligibility criteria were nonobese adults (body mass index [BMI] <30 kg/m2) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) undergoing MS. T2DM remission rate, glycemic parameters, and weight loss were measured before and after surgery. Complication rate was also described. Outcomes were aggregated and the quality of evidence was sorted. Heterogeneity was assumed when I2 >50%. The random-effects model was used to perform a proportional meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-one studies were included (n = 835). The overall rate of diabetes remission was 50.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 43.8%–56.1%; P = 0.993; I2 = 92%). The mean reduction of glycated hemoglobin and fasting glucose was 2.42% (95% CI = 1.91%–2.93%; P < 0.00001; I2 = 89%) and 70.60 mg/dL, respectively. A drop of 3.34 points (95% CI = 1.59–5.09; P < 0.0002; I2 = 95%) was observed in the HOMA-IR, and the mean postprandial glycemia was 123.27 mg/dL. No marked weight loss was observed (−3.80 kg/m2 in BMI; 95% CI = 2.70–4.91; P < 0.00001; I2 = 95%). There was no postoperative mortality, and the overall postoperative complication rate was about 12%. The certainty of evidence was low or very low. Conclusion: MS could be effective in the surgical approach of nonobese diabetic patients, but further long-term, more robust studies are needed to strengthen the evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代谢手术治疗非肥胖糖尿病患者的短期疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
目的:本研究的目的是评估代谢手术(MS)在非肥胖糖尿病患者中的安全性和短期有效性。方法:本系统评价采用系统评价首选报告项目和荟萃分析声明。证据检索在Medline (PubMed)、Embase、Cochrane (CENTRAL)、LILACS和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中进行,检索时间从研究开始到2023年2月。主要入选标准为非肥胖成人(体重指数[BMI] 50%)。采用随机效应模型进行比例元分析。结果:共纳入21项研究(n = 835)。总体糖尿病缓解率为50.1%(95%可信区间[CI] = 43.8%-56.1%;P = 0.993;I2 = 92%)。糖化血红蛋白和空腹血糖平均降低2.42% (95% CI = 1.91%-2.93%;P < 0.00001;I2 = 89%)和70.60 mg/dL。下降3.34点(95% CI = 1.59-5.09;P < 0.0002;在HOMA-IR中观察到I2 = 95%),平均餐后血糖为123.27 mg/dL。体重没有明显下降(BMI - 3.80 kg/m2;95% ci = 2.70-4.91;P < 0.00001;I2 = 95%)。无术后死亡,术后总并发症发生率约为12%。证据的确定性很低或非常低。结论:MS在非肥胖糖尿病患者的手术入路中可能是有效的,但需要进一步的长期、更有力的研究来加强证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Nationwide Report on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in 2019-2022: Utilizing the Korean Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Database Registry. Abdominal Drains After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Should They Be Used? Positioning the Bariatric Amputee: A Case Report. Prediction Model for Chronological Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery in Korean Patients. Enteroendocrine Reprogramming by Altered Epithelial-Mesenchymal Crosstalk in Metabolic Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1