National identities and war heritage: acceptance and resistance of an authorised heritage discourse among visitors to the Australian War Memorial

IF 1.7 1区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Heritage Studies Pub Date : 2020-07-23 DOI:10.1080/13527258.2020.1798270
Tiina Roppola, D. Uzzell, J. Packer, R. Ballantyne
{"title":"National identities and war heritage: acceptance and resistance of an authorised heritage discourse among visitors to the Australian War Memorial","authors":"Tiina Roppola, D. Uzzell, J. Packer, R. Ballantyne","doi":"10.1080/13527258.2020.1798270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines the convergence of national identities and war heritage, among first-, second- and third-plus-generation Australians. In Australia, interpretation of a First World War event, the Anzac story, is promoted as war heritage central to national identity. What meaning might this discourse have in today’s multicultural Australia? Qualitative interviews were conducted with 93 adult visitors to the Australian War Memorial, 37 of whom had recent migrant backgrounds from 20 countries of origin. The analysis applied ‘authorised heritage discourse’ (AHD) as a theoretical framework. Visitors displayed three different orientations to an AHD that merged war heritage with national identity. The dominant group positively aligned with the war heritage/national identity AHD. In this group, national identity is reinforced by those qualities typically ascribed as being forged out of the ANZAC’s experience. Those consciously aligned critique the mythological status of the Anzac legacy yet embrace it as important for national identities. Those resisting the war heritage/national identity AHD disrupt the often-assumed links between history, heritage and identities. These three orientations appear to be independent of the participants’ country of birth or cultural background, showing the constructed nature of heritage and fluidity of national identities.","PeriodicalId":47807,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heritage Studies","volume":"77 1","pages":"375 - 390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heritage Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1798270","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the convergence of national identities and war heritage, among first-, second- and third-plus-generation Australians. In Australia, interpretation of a First World War event, the Anzac story, is promoted as war heritage central to national identity. What meaning might this discourse have in today’s multicultural Australia? Qualitative interviews were conducted with 93 adult visitors to the Australian War Memorial, 37 of whom had recent migrant backgrounds from 20 countries of origin. The analysis applied ‘authorised heritage discourse’ (AHD) as a theoretical framework. Visitors displayed three different orientations to an AHD that merged war heritage with national identity. The dominant group positively aligned with the war heritage/national identity AHD. In this group, national identity is reinforced by those qualities typically ascribed as being forged out of the ANZAC’s experience. Those consciously aligned critique the mythological status of the Anzac legacy yet embrace it as important for national identities. Those resisting the war heritage/national identity AHD disrupt the often-assumed links between history, heritage and identities. These three orientations appear to be independent of the participants’ country of birth or cultural background, showing the constructed nature of heritage and fluidity of national identities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家身份与战争遗产:澳大利亚战争纪念馆参观者对授权遗产话语的接受与抵制
本文考察了第一代、第二代和第三代澳大利亚人的民族认同和战争遗产的融合。在澳大利亚,对第一次世界大战事件的解释,澳新军团的故事,被宣传为国家认同的核心战争遗产。这种话语在今天多元文化的澳大利亚有什么意义呢?对93名参观澳大利亚战争纪念馆的成年游客进行了定性访谈,其中37人最近有来自20个原籍国的移民背景。该分析将“授权遗产话语”(AHD)作为理论框架。游客们向将战争遗产与国家身份融合在一起的AHD展示了三种不同的方向。主导群体积极地与战争遗产/民族认同结盟。在这个群体中,那些通常被认为是澳新军团经历塑造出来的品质强化了他们的民族认同。那些有意识地结盟的人批评澳新军团遗产的神话地位,但却将其视为国家认同的重要因素。那些反对战争遗产/民族身份的人破坏了人们通常认为的历史、遗产和身份之间的联系。这三种取向似乎独立于参与者的出生国或文化背景,显示了国家身份的遗产和流动性的建构性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Heritage Studies ( IJHS ) is the interdisciplinary academic, refereed journal for scholars and practitioners with a common interest in heritage. The Journal encourages debate over the nature and meaning of heritage as well as its links to memory, identities and place. Articles may include issues emerging from Heritage Studies, Museum Studies, History, Tourism Studies, Sociology, Anthropology, Memory Studies, Cultural Geography, Law, Cultural Studies, and Interpretation and Design.
期刊最新文献
Can immersive technologies rebuild heritage and sense of place? Examining virtual Reality's role in fostering community resilience in post-disaster Italy. Collecting traces of the outside world: an alternative collective memory of the lockdown Route to nowhere: assessing the failure of the Ave Basin Industrial Heritage Route (Portugal) Disability activism and institutional heritage Values in cities: urban heritage in twentieth-century Australia Values in cities: urban heritage in twentieth-century Australia , by James Lesh, New York and London, Routledge, September 23 2022, 338 pp., USD 127.50, hardcover, ISBN 9780367371050.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1